Initial Assessment of a Brief Health, Fitness, and Spirituality Survey for Epidemiological Research: A Pilot Study.

Peter D Hart
{"title":"Initial Assessment of a Brief Health, Fitness, and Spirituality Survey for Epidemiological Research: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Peter D Hart","doi":"10.15280/jlm.2022.12.3.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Not many population-based health studies include items to assess both fitness and spirituality concepts. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine initial data of a brief health, fitness, and spirituality survey for epidemiological research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This first phase pilot study used data from N = 56 adults 18+ years of age via electronic questionnaire. Measures of general health, fitness, physical activity (PA), body mass index (BMI), religiosity, and happiness were assessed. Reliability analyses were employed for PA, religiosity, and happiness scales. Validity coefficients were computed to evaluate convergence between scale scores and related measures. Finally, difference in health was examined between different levels of fitness to evaluate known groups discrimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents were middle-aged (Mean = 50.5 yr, SD = 14.3), majority white (69.5%, SD = 6.2), with relatively low BMI (Mean = 25.3, SD = 5.3). All three scales showed internal consistency reliability of α = 0.93, α = 0.89, and KR-20 = 0.56 for religiosity, happiness, and PA, respectively. Furthermore, scores converged (ps < 0.05) between fitness and PA (r = 0.43), health (r = 0.66), BMI (r = -0.28), and happiness (r = 0.25). Finally, health scores were significantly greater for high fitness versus low fitness in both male (p < 0.001) and female (p = 0.015) populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results from this study indicate that a brief health, fitness, and spirituality survey can reliably measure its intended traits. A single-item of self-assessed fitness in particular has promise for large scale epidemiological research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73805,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lifestyle medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/e1/jlm-12-3-119.PMC9798877.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lifestyle medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15280/jlm.2022.12.3.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Not many population-based health studies include items to assess both fitness and spirituality concepts. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine initial data of a brief health, fitness, and spirituality survey for epidemiological research.

Methods: This first phase pilot study used data from N = 56 adults 18+ years of age via electronic questionnaire. Measures of general health, fitness, physical activity (PA), body mass index (BMI), religiosity, and happiness were assessed. Reliability analyses were employed for PA, religiosity, and happiness scales. Validity coefficients were computed to evaluate convergence between scale scores and related measures. Finally, difference in health was examined between different levels of fitness to evaluate known groups discrimination.

Results: Respondents were middle-aged (Mean = 50.5 yr, SD = 14.3), majority white (69.5%, SD = 6.2), with relatively low BMI (Mean = 25.3, SD = 5.3). All three scales showed internal consistency reliability of α = 0.93, α = 0.89, and KR-20 = 0.56 for religiosity, happiness, and PA, respectively. Furthermore, scores converged (ps < 0.05) between fitness and PA (r = 0.43), health (r = 0.66), BMI (r = -0.28), and happiness (r = 0.25). Finally, health scores were significantly greater for high fitness versus low fitness in both male (p < 0.001) and female (p = 0.015) populations.

Conclusion: Results from this study indicate that a brief health, fitness, and spirituality survey can reliably measure its intended traits. A single-item of self-assessed fitness in particular has promise for large scale epidemiological research.

Abstract Image

流行病学研究中一项简短的健康、健身和精神调查的初步评估:一项试点研究。
背景:没有多少基于人群的健康研究包括评估健康和灵性概念的项目。因此,本研究的目的是为流行病学研究检查一个简短的健康、健身和精神调查的初始数据。方法:第一阶段先导研究采用电子问卷调查的方式收集了56名18岁以上成年人的数据。评估了总体健康、体能、体力活动(PA)、身体质量指数(BMI)、宗教信仰和幸福感等指标。信度分析采用信度分析的PA,宗教,和幸福量表。计算效度系数以评估量表得分与相关措施之间的收敛性。最后,研究了不同健康水平之间的健康差异,以评估已知的群体歧视。结果:调查对象为中年人(Mean = 50.5 yr, SD = 14.3),白人居多(69.5%,SD = 6.2), BMI较低(Mean = 25.3, SD = 5.3)。三个量表的内部一致性信度分别为α = 0.93、α = 0.89和KR-20 = 0.56。此外,得分在健身和PA (r = 0.43)、健康(r = 0.66)、BMI (r = -0.28)和幸福(r = 0.25)之间趋于一致(ps < 0.05)。最后,在男性(p < 0.001)和女性(p = 0.015)人群中,高健康水平的健康得分明显高于低健康水平。结论:本研究结果表明,一个简短的健康,健身和精神调查可以可靠地测量其预期特征。一项自我评估的健康状况尤其有望用于大规模的流行病学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信