Chronic Effects of Inter-Set Static Stretching on Morphofunctional Outcomes in Recreationally Resistance-Trained Male and Female.

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Guilherme Borsetti Businari, Felipe Alves Brigatto, Júlio Benvenutti Bueno de Camargo, Enrico Gori Soares, Tiago Volpi Braz, Danilo Rodrigues Batista, Luan Oenning Col, Wellington Gonçalves Dias, Jhenipher Moniky Rosolem, Jonato Prestes, Paulo Henrique Marchetti, Charles Ricardo Lopes
{"title":"Chronic Effects of Inter-Set Static Stretching on Morphofunctional Outcomes in Recreationally Resistance-Trained Male and Female.","authors":"Guilherme Borsetti Businari, Felipe Alves Brigatto, Júlio Benvenutti Bueno de Camargo, Enrico Gori Soares, Tiago Volpi Braz, Danilo Rodrigues Batista, Luan Oenning Col, Wellington Gonçalves Dias, Jhenipher Moniky Rosolem, Jonato Prestes, Paulo Henrique Marchetti, Charles Ricardo Lopes","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2022.2134547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of resistance training (RT) with inter-set static stretching (IS) versus traditional RT (TRT) on morphofunctional outcomes in recreationally resistance-trained male and female. <b>Methods</b>: Twenty-two recreationally-trained subjects were allocated to IS group (n = 12) or TRT (n = 10) and completed eight weeks of RT. The only difference between the groups was that IS group included static stretching between sets, while the TRT rested between the sets. Ultrasound images, dynamic and isometric strength tests for the elbow flexors and elbow extensors were evaluated pre- and post-intervention period. <b>Results</b>: Total training volume (TTV) was greater in TRT than IS (<i>p</i> = .031). TRT and IS caused similar increases in maximal dynamic and isometric strength. Fascicle length of the brachialis increased following TRT (<i>p</i> = .033); muscle thickness and the pennation angle of the distal portion of the triceps brachii increased following IS (<i>p</i> = .035 and <i>p</i> = .007, respectively). There were no significant changes in thickness and architecture for biceps brachii in either group. There were no significant differences between groups for any muscle strength and morphology outcome. <b>Conclusion</b>: IS negatively affects TTV but does not affect muscle strength and architecture of recreationally resistance-trained male and female.</p>","PeriodicalId":54491,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2134547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of resistance training (RT) with inter-set static stretching (IS) versus traditional RT (TRT) on morphofunctional outcomes in recreationally resistance-trained male and female. Methods: Twenty-two recreationally-trained subjects were allocated to IS group (n = 12) or TRT (n = 10) and completed eight weeks of RT. The only difference between the groups was that IS group included static stretching between sets, while the TRT rested between the sets. Ultrasound images, dynamic and isometric strength tests for the elbow flexors and elbow extensors were evaluated pre- and post-intervention period. Results: Total training volume (TTV) was greater in TRT than IS (p = .031). TRT and IS caused similar increases in maximal dynamic and isometric strength. Fascicle length of the brachialis increased following TRT (p = .033); muscle thickness and the pennation angle of the distal portion of the triceps brachii increased following IS (p = .035 and p = .007, respectively). There were no significant changes in thickness and architecture for biceps brachii in either group. There were no significant differences between groups for any muscle strength and morphology outcome. Conclusion: IS negatively affects TTV but does not affect muscle strength and architecture of recreationally resistance-trained male and female.

组间静态拉伸对休闲抗阻训练的男性和女性形态功能结果的慢性影响
目的:本研究旨在比较阻力训练(RT)与间歇静态拉伸(IS)和传统阻力训练(TRT)对休闲阻力训练男性和女性的形态功能结果的影响。训练方法将 22 名休闲训练的受试者分配到 IS 组(12 人)或 TRT 组(10 人),并完成为期 8 周的 RT 训练。两组的唯一区别是 IS 组在两组之间进行静态拉伸,而 TRT 组在两组之间休息。对干预前后的超声波图像、肘屈肌和肘伸肌的动态和等长力量测试进行了评估。结果显示TRT的总训练量(TTV)大于IS(P = .031)。TRT和IS对最大动态和等长力量的增加效果相似。肱肌束长在 TRT 后有所增加(p = 0.033);肱三头肌远端肌肉厚度和折角在 IS 后有所增加(p = 0.035 和 p = 0.007)。两组肱二头肌的厚度和结构均无明显变化。在肌肉力量和形态结果方面,各组之间没有明显差异。结论IS 会对 TTV 产生负面影响,但不会影响休闲阻力训练的男性和女性的肌肉力量和结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport publishes research in the art and science of human movement that contributes significantly to the knowledge base of the field as new information, reviews, substantiation or contradiction of previous findings, development of theory, or as application of new or improved techniques. The goals of RQES are to provide a scholarly outlet for knowledge that: (a) contributes to the study of human movement, particularly its cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature; (b) impacts theory and practice regarding human movement; (c) stimulates research about human movement; and (d) provides theoretical reviews and tutorials related to the study of human movement. The editorial board, associate editors, and external reviewers assist the editor-in-chief. Qualified reviewers in the appropriate subdisciplines review manuscripts deemed suitable. Authors are usually advised of the decision on their papers within 75–90 days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信