Assessing the reliability of CBCT-based AI-generated STL files in diagnosing osseous changes of the mandibular condyle: a comparative study with ground truth diagnosis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20230141
Kaan Orhan, Alex Sanders, Gürkan Ünsal, Matvey Ezhov, Melis Mısırlı, Maxim Gusarev, Murat İçen, Mamat Shamshiev, Gaye Keser, Filiz Namdar Pekiner, Maria Golitsyna, Merve Önder, David Manulis, Cemal Atakan
{"title":"Assessing the reliability of CBCT-based AI-generated STL files in diagnosing osseous changes of the mandibular condyle: a comparative study with ground truth diagnosis.","authors":"Kaan Orhan, Alex Sanders, Gürkan Ünsal, Matvey Ezhov, Melis Mısırlı, Maxim Gusarev, Murat İçen, Mamat Shamshiev, Gaye Keser, Filiz Namdar Pekiner, Maria Golitsyna, Merve Önder, David Manulis, Cemal Atakan","doi":"10.1259/dmfr.20230141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the reliability of AI-generated STL files in diagnosing osseous changes of the mandibular condyle and compare them to a ground truth (GT) diagnosis made by six radiologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 432 retrospective CBCT images from four universities were evaluated by six dentomaxillofacial radiologists who identified osseous changes such as flattening, erosion, osteophyte formation, bifid condyle formation, and osteosclerosis. All images were evaluated by each radiologist blindly and recorded on a spreadsheet. All evaluations were compared and for the disagreements, a consensus meeting was held online to create a uniform GT diagnosis spreadsheet. A web-based dental AI software was used to generate STL files of the CBCT images, which were then evaluated by two dentomaxillofacial radiologists. The new observer, GT, was compared to this new STL file evaluation, and the interclass correlation (ICC) value was calculated for each pathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 864 condyles assessed, the ground truth diagnosis identified 372 cases of flattening, 185 cases of erosion, 70 cases of osteophyte formation, 117 cases of osteosclerosis, and 15 cases of bifid condyle formation. The ICC values for flattening, erosion, osteophyte formation, osteosclerosis, and bifid condyle formation were 1.000, 0.782, 1.000, 0.000, and 1.000, respectively, when comparing diagnoses made using STL files with the ground truth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-generated STL files are reliable in diagnosing bifid condyle formation, osteophyte formation, and flattening of the condyle. However, the diagnosis of osteosclerosis using AI-generated STL files is not reliable, and the accuracy of diagnosis is affected by the erosion grade.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the reliability of AI-generated STL files in diagnosing osseous changes of the mandibular condyle and compare them to a ground truth (GT) diagnosis made by six radiologists.

Methods: A total of 432 retrospective CBCT images from four universities were evaluated by six dentomaxillofacial radiologists who identified osseous changes such as flattening, erosion, osteophyte formation, bifid condyle formation, and osteosclerosis. All images were evaluated by each radiologist blindly and recorded on a spreadsheet. All evaluations were compared and for the disagreements, a consensus meeting was held online to create a uniform GT diagnosis spreadsheet. A web-based dental AI software was used to generate STL files of the CBCT images, which were then evaluated by two dentomaxillofacial radiologists. The new observer, GT, was compared to this new STL file evaluation, and the interclass correlation (ICC) value was calculated for each pathology.

Results: Out of the 864 condyles assessed, the ground truth diagnosis identified 372 cases of flattening, 185 cases of erosion, 70 cases of osteophyte formation, 117 cases of osteosclerosis, and 15 cases of bifid condyle formation. The ICC values for flattening, erosion, osteophyte formation, osteosclerosis, and bifid condyle formation were 1.000, 0.782, 1.000, 0.000, and 1.000, respectively, when comparing diagnoses made using STL files with the ground truth.

Conclusions: AI-generated STL files are reliable in diagnosing bifid condyle formation, osteophyte formation, and flattening of the condyle. However, the diagnosis of osteosclerosis using AI-generated STL files is not reliable, and the accuracy of diagnosis is affected by the erosion grade.

评估基于CBCT的人工智能生成的STL文件在诊断髁突骨变化方面的可靠性:一项与真实诊断的比较研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估人工智能生成的STL文件在诊断髁突骨变化方面的可靠性,并将其与六名放射科医生做出的基本事实(GT)诊断进行比较。方法:六名牙颌面放射科医生对来自四所大学的432张回顾性CBCT图像进行了评估,他们确定了骨变化,如扁平化、侵蚀、骨赘形成、髁裂形成和骨硬化。每个放射科医生对所有图像进行盲评估,并将其记录在电子表格上。对所有评估进行了比较,针对分歧,在线举行了一次共识会议,以创建统一的GT诊断电子表格。使用基于网络的牙科AI软件生成CBCT图像的STL文件,然后由两名牙颌面放射科医生对其进行评估。将新的观察者GT与新的STL文件评估进行比较,并计算每个病理学的类间相关性(ICC)值。结果:在评估的864个髁突中,基本诊断确定了372例扁平化,185例侵蚀,70例骨赘形成,117例骨硬化,15例髁突裂形成。当将使用STL文件进行的诊断与基本事实进行比较时,扁平化、侵蚀、骨赘形成、骨硬化和髁裂形成的ICC值分别为1.000、0.782、1.000、0.000和1.000。结论:人工智能生成的STL文件在诊断髁突裂、骨赘形成和髁突扁平化方面是可靠的。然而,使用人工智能生成的STL文件诊断骨硬化症并不可靠,诊断的准确性受到侵蚀程度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信