A comparison of activity data generated from cardiovascular telemetry studies - With quantitative open field locomotor studies in Wistar Han rats

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Cheryl Tyszkiewicz , Vincent Bernardo , Siddhartha Bhatt , Susan Goody , Todd Wisialowski
{"title":"A comparison of activity data generated from cardiovascular telemetry studies - With quantitative open field locomotor studies in Wistar Han rats","authors":"Cheryl Tyszkiewicz ,&nbsp;Vincent Bernardo ,&nbsp;Siddhartha Bhatt ,&nbsp;Susan Goody ,&nbsp;Todd Wisialowski","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2022.107208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compound-mediated locomotion changes, conducted via open field infrared photobeam breaks, are an important common component of neurological assessments conducted in safety pharmacology studies. In addition to open field locomotor activity assessments, activity data (derived from changes in signal strength) from cardiovascular (CV) telemetry studies can also be an alternative method potentially used to assess locomotor effects. However, comparisons of these two methods have not been extensively characterized. The goal of this work was to compare these two methodologies to assess activity in rats using reference compounds known to have central nervous system (CNS)-stimulant (preladenant) or CNS-depressant (chlorpromazine) effects. Open field activity was conducted using the Kinder Scientific Motor Monitor system and data were collected for 30 min at each drug's expected time of maximum plasma exposure (Tmax). Telemetry-based CV assessment data were continuously acquired using DSI radiotelemetry instrumented animals for 24 h postdose (HPD). Drugs were administered during the lights-on period for both study types. Administration of preladenant caused increases in activity within 0.5–2 HPD for both methods. While administration of chlorpromazine caused decreases in activity in the infrared beam-based open field assessment (1.0–1.5 HPD), there was no effect on telemetry-derived activity during a similar time period. However, telemetry-derived decreases in activity were observed during the lights-off period (16–20 HPD), suggesting CNS-depressant compounds may be mischaracterized if the optimal dose administration time is not selected based on the light/dark cycle and pharmacokinetics. Overall, these results suggest that telemetry-based activity assessment is capable of detecting CNS-stimulant effects of compounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871922000557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compound-mediated locomotion changes, conducted via open field infrared photobeam breaks, are an important common component of neurological assessments conducted in safety pharmacology studies. In addition to open field locomotor activity assessments, activity data (derived from changes in signal strength) from cardiovascular (CV) telemetry studies can also be an alternative method potentially used to assess locomotor effects. However, comparisons of these two methods have not been extensively characterized. The goal of this work was to compare these two methodologies to assess activity in rats using reference compounds known to have central nervous system (CNS)-stimulant (preladenant) or CNS-depressant (chlorpromazine) effects. Open field activity was conducted using the Kinder Scientific Motor Monitor system and data were collected for 30 min at each drug's expected time of maximum plasma exposure (Tmax). Telemetry-based CV assessment data were continuously acquired using DSI radiotelemetry instrumented animals for 24 h postdose (HPD). Drugs were administered during the lights-on period for both study types. Administration of preladenant caused increases in activity within 0.5–2 HPD for both methods. While administration of chlorpromazine caused decreases in activity in the infrared beam-based open field assessment (1.0–1.5 HPD), there was no effect on telemetry-derived activity during a similar time period. However, telemetry-derived decreases in activity were observed during the lights-off period (16–20 HPD), suggesting CNS-depressant compounds may be mischaracterized if the optimal dose administration time is not selected based on the light/dark cycle and pharmacokinetics. Overall, these results suggest that telemetry-based activity assessment is capable of detecting CNS-stimulant effects of compounds.

由心血管遥测研究产生的活动数据的比较-与定量开放场运动研究的Wistar Han大鼠
化合物介导的运动变化是通过开放场红外光束断裂进行的,是安全药理学研究中进行神经学评估的重要组成部分。除了野外运动活动评估外,心血管(CV)遥测研究的活动数据(来自信号强度的变化)也可能是评估运动效果的另一种方法。然而,这两种方法的比较尚未得到广泛的表征。本研究的目的是比较这两种方法,使用已知具有中枢神经系统(CNS)兴奋(preladenant)或中枢神经系统抑制(氯丙嗪)作用的参考化合物来评估大鼠的活性。使用Kinder科学运动监测系统进行野外活动,并在每种药物的预期最大血浆暴露时间(Tmax)收集30分钟的数据。在给药后24小时(HPD),使用DSI无线电遥测仪器连续获取基于遥测的CV评估数据。两种类型的研究都是在开灯期间给药的。在这两种方法中,给药可使活性在0.5-2 HPD范围内增加。虽然氯丙嗪的使用导致基于红外束的开放场评估(1.0-1.5 HPD)的活性下降,但在类似的时间内,对遥测衍生的活性没有影响。然而,在关灯期间(16-20 HPD)观察到遥测衍生的活性下降,这表明如果不根据光/暗周期和药代动力学选择最佳剂量给药时间,可能会对cns抑制剂化合物进行错误表征。总的来说,这些结果表明基于遥测的活性评估能够检测化合物的中枢神经系统刺激作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信