Comparative study of conventional and synchrotron X-ray electron densities on molecular crystals.

IF 1.3 3区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Emilie S Vosegaard, Jakob V Ahlburg, Lennard Krause, Bo B Iversen
{"title":"Comparative study of conventional and synchrotron X-ray electron densities on molecular crystals.","authors":"Emilie S Vosegaard,&nbsp;Jakob V Ahlburg,&nbsp;Lennard Krause,&nbsp;Bo B Iversen","doi":"10.1107/S2052520623006625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Five different electron density datasets obtained from conventional and synchrotron single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments are compared. The general aim of the study is to investigate the quality of data for electron density analysis from current state-of-the-art conventional sources, and to see how the data perform in comparison with high-quality synchrotron data. A molecular crystal of melamine was selected as the test compound due to its ability to form excellent single crystals, the light atom content, and an advantageous suitability factor of 3.6 for electron density modeling. These features make melamine an optimal system for conventional X-ray diffractometers since the inherent advantages of synchrotron sources such as short wavelength and high intensity are less critical in this case. Data were obtained at 100 K from new in-house diffractometers Rigaku Synergy-S (Mo and Ag source, HyPix100 detector) and Stoe Stadivari (Mo source, EIGER2 1M CdTe detector), and an older Oxford Diffraction Supernova (Mo source, Atlas CCD detector). The synchrotron data were obtained at 25 K from BL02B1 beamline at SPring-8 in Japan (λ = 0.2480 Å, Pilatus3 X 1M CdTe detector). The five datasets were compared on general quality parameters such as resolution, ⟨I/σ⟩, redundancy and R factors, as well as the more model specific fractal dimension plot and residual density maps. Comparison of the extracted electron densities reveals that all datasets can provide reliable multipole models, which overall convey similar chemical information. However, the new laboratory X-ray diffractometers with advanced pixel detector technology clearly measure data with significantly less noise and much higher reliability giving densities of higher quality, compared to the older instrument. The synchrotron data have higher resolution and lower measurement temperature, and they allow for finer details to be modeled (e.g. hydrogen κ parameters).</p>","PeriodicalId":7320,"journal":{"name":"Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520623006625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Five different electron density datasets obtained from conventional and synchrotron single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments are compared. The general aim of the study is to investigate the quality of data for electron density analysis from current state-of-the-art conventional sources, and to see how the data perform in comparison with high-quality synchrotron data. A molecular crystal of melamine was selected as the test compound due to its ability to form excellent single crystals, the light atom content, and an advantageous suitability factor of 3.6 for electron density modeling. These features make melamine an optimal system for conventional X-ray diffractometers since the inherent advantages of synchrotron sources such as short wavelength and high intensity are less critical in this case. Data were obtained at 100 K from new in-house diffractometers Rigaku Synergy-S (Mo and Ag source, HyPix100 detector) and Stoe Stadivari (Mo source, EIGER2 1M CdTe detector), and an older Oxford Diffraction Supernova (Mo source, Atlas CCD detector). The synchrotron data were obtained at 25 K from BL02B1 beamline at SPring-8 in Japan (λ = 0.2480 Å, Pilatus3 X 1M CdTe detector). The five datasets were compared on general quality parameters such as resolution, ⟨I/σ⟩, redundancy and R factors, as well as the more model specific fractal dimension plot and residual density maps. Comparison of the extracted electron densities reveals that all datasets can provide reliable multipole models, which overall convey similar chemical information. However, the new laboratory X-ray diffractometers with advanced pixel detector technology clearly measure data with significantly less noise and much higher reliability giving densities of higher quality, compared to the older instrument. The synchrotron data have higher resolution and lower measurement temperature, and they allow for finer details to be modeled (e.g. hydrogen κ parameters).

Abstract Image

分子晶体上常规和同步加速器X射线电子密度的比较研究。
比较了从常规和同步加速器单晶X射线衍射实验中获得的五个不同的电子密度数据集。这项研究的总体目的是调查当前最先进的传统来源的电子密度分析数据的质量,并观察这些数据与高质量同步加速器数据相比的表现。三聚氰胺的分子晶体被选择作为测试化合物,因为它能够形成优异的单晶,轻原子含量,并且电子密度建模的有利适用因子为3.6。这些特征使三聚氰胺成为传统X射线衍射仪的最佳系统,因为同步辐射源的固有优势,如短波长和高强度,在这种情况下不那么关键。数据是在100 K来自新的内部衍射仪Rigaku Synergy-S(Mo和Ag源,HyPix100探测器)和Stoe Stadivari(Mo源,EIGER2 1M CdTe探测器),以及一个旧的牛津衍射超新星(Mo源、Atlas CCD探测器)。同步加速器数据是在25 来自日本SPring-8的BL02B1光束线的K(λ=0.2480 Å,Pilatus3 X 1M CdTe探测器)。对这五个数据集的一般质量参数进行了比较,如分辨率、I/σ、冗余度和R因子,以及更具模型特异性的分形维数图和残差密度图。对提取的电子密度的比较表明,所有数据集都可以提供可靠的多极模型,这些模型总体上传达了相似的化学信息。然而,与旧仪器相比,具有先进像素检测器技术的新型实验室X射线衍射仪可以以明显更小的噪声和更高的可靠性清晰地测量数据,从而提供更高质量的密度。同步加速器数据具有更高的分辨率和更低的测量温度,并且它们允许对更精细的细节进行建模(例如氢κ参数)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials
Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARYCRYSTALLOGRAPH-CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Acta Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, Crystal Engineering and Materials publishes scientific articles related to the structural science of compounds and materials in the widest sense. Knowledge of the arrangements of atoms, including their temporal variations and dependencies on temperature and pressure, is often the key to understanding physical and chemical phenomena and is crucial for the design of new materials and supramolecular devices. Acta Crystallographica B is the forum for the publication of such contributions. Scientific developments based on experimental studies as well as those based on theoretical approaches, including crystal-structure prediction, structure-property relations and the use of databases of crystal structures, are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信