Effects of Non-monetary Incentives in Physician Groups-A Systematic Review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ann-Kathrin Heider, Harald Mang
{"title":"Effects of Non-monetary Incentives in Physician Groups-A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ann-Kathrin Heider,&nbsp;Harald Mang","doi":"10.5993/AJHB.47.3.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Healthcare expenditures in western countries have been rising for many years. This leads many countries to develop and test new reimbursement systems. A systematic review about monetary incentives in group settings indicated that a sole focus on monetary aspects does not necessarily result in better care at lower costs. Hence, this systematic review aims to describe the effects of non- monetary incentives in physician groups. <b>Methods:</b> We searched the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit, and ISI Web of Science. Grey literature search, reference lists, and authors' personal collection provided additional sources. <b>Results:</b> Overall, we included 36 studies. We identified 4 categories of interventions related to non-monetary incentives. In particular, the category of decision support achieved promising results. However, design features vary among different decision support systems. To enable effective design, we provide an overview of the features applied by the studies included. <b>Conclusions:</b> Not every type of non-monetary incentive has a positive impact on quality of care in physician group settings. Thus, creating awareness among decision-makers regarding this matter and extending research on this topic can contribute to preventing implementation of ineffective incentives, and consequently, allocate resources towards tools that add value.</p>","PeriodicalId":7699,"journal":{"name":"American journal of health behavior","volume":"47 3","pages":"458-470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of health behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.47.3.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Healthcare expenditures in western countries have been rising for many years. This leads many countries to develop and test new reimbursement systems. A systematic review about monetary incentives in group settings indicated that a sole focus on monetary aspects does not necessarily result in better care at lower costs. Hence, this systematic review aims to describe the effects of non- monetary incentives in physician groups. Methods: We searched the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit, and ISI Web of Science. Grey literature search, reference lists, and authors' personal collection provided additional sources. Results: Overall, we included 36 studies. We identified 4 categories of interventions related to non-monetary incentives. In particular, the category of decision support achieved promising results. However, design features vary among different decision support systems. To enable effective design, we provide an overview of the features applied by the studies included. Conclusions: Not every type of non-monetary incentive has a positive impact on quality of care in physician group settings. Thus, creating awareness among decision-makers regarding this matter and extending research on this topic can contribute to preventing implementation of ineffective incentives, and consequently, allocate resources towards tools that add value.

非金钱激励对医生群体的影响——一项系统评价。
目的:西方国家的医疗保健支出多年来一直在上升。这导致许多国家开发和试验新的报销制度。一项关于群体环境中的金钱激励的系统审查表明,仅仅关注金钱方面并不一定会以较低的成本带来更好的护理。因此,本系统综述旨在描述非金钱激励在医生群体中的作用。方法:检索MEDLINE (PubMed)、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、PsycINFO、EconLit、ISI Web of Science等数据库。灰色文献检索,参考文献列表和作者个人收藏提供了额外的来源。结果:总的来说,我们纳入了36项研究。我们确定了4类与非货币激励相关的干预措施。特别是,决策支持类别取得了可喜的成果。然而,不同的决策支持系统的设计特征各不相同。为了实现有效的设计,我们概述了所包括的研究所应用的特征。结论:并不是每一种非金钱激励都对医生群体的护理质量有积极的影响。因此,提高决策者对这一问题的认识和扩大对这一主题的研究可以有助于防止实施无效的激励措施,从而将资源分配给增加价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of health behavior
American journal of health behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal seeks to improve the quality of life through multidisciplinary health efforts in fostering a better understanding of the multidimensional nature of both individuals and social systems as they relate to health behaviors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信