A step-by-step approach for assessing acute oral toxicity without animal testing for additives of quasi-drugs and cosmetic ingredients

IF 2.9 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Hajime Kojima , Tokio Nakada , Akiko Yagami , Hiroaki Todo , Jihei Nishimura , Mio Yagi , Keiko Yamamoto , Mariko Sugiyama , Yoshiaki Ikarashi , Hitoshi Sakaguchi , Masahiko Yamaguchi , Morihiko Hirota , Sakiko Aizawa , Shota Nakagawa , Shigenobu Hagino , Masato Hatao
{"title":"A step-by-step approach for assessing acute oral toxicity without animal testing for additives of quasi-drugs and cosmetic ingredients","authors":"Hajime Kojima ,&nbsp;Tokio Nakada ,&nbsp;Akiko Yagami ,&nbsp;Hiroaki Todo ,&nbsp;Jihei Nishimura ,&nbsp;Mio Yagi ,&nbsp;Keiko Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Mariko Sugiyama ,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Ikarashi ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Sakaguchi ,&nbsp;Masahiko Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Morihiko Hirota ,&nbsp;Sakiko Aizawa ,&nbsp;Shota Nakagawa ,&nbsp;Shigenobu Hagino ,&nbsp;Masato Hatao","doi":"10.1016/j.crtox.2022.100100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Animal testing of cosmetic ingredients and products has been banned in the European Union since 2013. However, in Japan, the application of new quasi-drugs requires the generation of data on acute oral toxicity through animal testing. A weight of evidence approach for assessing oral toxicity was challenged. This approach used a combination of safety data, including a neutral red uptake cytotoxicity assay using BALB/c3T3 cells (3T3-NRU cytotoxicity assay), which can assess the acute oral toxicity of quasi-drugs or cosmetic ingredients. We conclude that the step-by-step approach can be used to assess test substances that cause low acute oral toxicity, such as the median lethal dose (LD 50) &gt; 2000 mg/kg, thereby avoiding animal testing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11236,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Toxicology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/a0/main.PMC9816657.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666027X22000378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Animal testing of cosmetic ingredients and products has been banned in the European Union since 2013. However, in Japan, the application of new quasi-drugs requires the generation of data on acute oral toxicity through animal testing. A weight of evidence approach for assessing oral toxicity was challenged. This approach used a combination of safety data, including a neutral red uptake cytotoxicity assay using BALB/c3T3 cells (3T3-NRU cytotoxicity assay), which can assess the acute oral toxicity of quasi-drugs or cosmetic ingredients. We conclude that the step-by-step approach can be used to assess test substances that cause low acute oral toxicity, such as the median lethal dose (LD 50) > 2000 mg/kg, thereby avoiding animal testing.

Abstract Image

一种逐步评估急性口服毒性的方法,无需对准药物和化妆品成分的添加剂进行动物试验
自2013年以来,欧盟禁止对化妆品成分和产品进行动物试验。然而,在日本,新的准药物的应用需要通过动物试验产生急性口服毒性的数据。评估口服毒性的证据权重方法受到质疑。该方法使用了安全性数据的组合,包括使用BALB/c3T3细胞的中性红摄取细胞毒性测定(3T3-NRU细胞毒性测定),该测定可以评估准药物或化妆品成分的急性口服毒性。我们得出的结论是,逐步方法可用于评估引起低急性口服毒性的测试物质,例如中位致死剂量(LD 50)>;2000 mg/kg,从而避免了动物试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Toxicology
Current Research in Toxicology Environmental Science-Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
82 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信