'She thought the same way I that I thought:' a qualitative study of patient-provider concordance among Gulf War Veterans with Gulf War Illness.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2023.2248481
Laura M Lesnewich, Justeen K Hyde, Mikhaela L McFarlin, Rendelle E Bolton, Peter J Bayley, Helena K Chandler, Drew A Helmer, L Alison Phillips, Matthew J Reinhard, Susan L Santos, Rachel S Stewart, Lisa M McAndrew
{"title":"'She thought the same way I that I thought:' a qualitative study of patient-provider concordance among Gulf War Veterans with Gulf War Illness.","authors":"Laura M Lesnewich, Justeen K Hyde, Mikhaela L McFarlin, Rendelle E Bolton, Peter J Bayley, Helena K Chandler, Drew A Helmer, L Alison Phillips, Matthew J Reinhard, Susan L Santos, Rachel S Stewart, Lisa M McAndrew","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2248481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), such as chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and Gulf War Illness (GWI), are difficult to treat. Concordance-shared understanding between patient and provider about illness causes, course, and treatment-is an essential component of high-quality care for people with MUS. This qualitative paper focuses on the experiences of United States military Veterans living with GWI who have endured unique healthcare challenges. <b>Methods & Measures:</b> Qualitative interviews were conducted with 31 Veterans with GWI to explore factors that contribute to and detract from concordance with their Veteran Affairs (VA) healthcare providers. In addition to being seen by VA primary care, over half of participants also sought care at a War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, which specializes in post-deployment health. Deductive and inductive codes were used to organize the data, and themes were identified through iterative review of coded data. <b>Results:</b> Major themes associated with patient-provider concordance included validation of illness experiences, perceived provider expertise in GWI/MUS, and trust in providers. Invalidation, low provider expertise, and distrust detracted from concordance. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings suggest providers can foster concordance with MUS patients by legitimizing patients' experiences, communicating knowledge about MUS, and establishing trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"616-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2248481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), such as chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and Gulf War Illness (GWI), are difficult to treat. Concordance-shared understanding between patient and provider about illness causes, course, and treatment-is an essential component of high-quality care for people with MUS. This qualitative paper focuses on the experiences of United States military Veterans living with GWI who have endured unique healthcare challenges. Methods & Measures: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 31 Veterans with GWI to explore factors that contribute to and detract from concordance with their Veteran Affairs (VA) healthcare providers. In addition to being seen by VA primary care, over half of participants also sought care at a War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, which specializes in post-deployment health. Deductive and inductive codes were used to organize the data, and themes were identified through iterative review of coded data. Results: Major themes associated with patient-provider concordance included validation of illness experiences, perceived provider expertise in GWI/MUS, and trust in providers. Invalidation, low provider expertise, and distrust detracted from concordance. Conclusion: These findings suggest providers can foster concordance with MUS patients by legitimizing patients' experiences, communicating knowledge about MUS, and establishing trust.

她的想法和我一样:“一项关于海湾战争退伍军人患海湾战争疾病的患者-提供者一致性的定性研究。”
目的:医学上无法解释的症状(MUS),如慢性疲劳综合征、肠易激综合征和海湾战争病(GWI),是难以治疗的。一致性——患者和提供者之间对疾病原因、病程和治疗的共同理解——是为MUS患者提供高质量护理的重要组成部分。这篇定性论文的重点是与GWI一起生活的美国退伍军人的经历,他们经历了独特的医疗挑战。方法与措施:对31名患有GWI的退伍军人进行定性访谈,探讨促进和减少与退伍军人事务(VA)医疗服务提供者的一致性的因素。除了接受VA初级保健服务外,超过一半的参与者还在专门研究部署后健康的战争相关疾病和伤害研究中心寻求治疗。使用演绎和归纳代码来组织数据,并通过对编码数据的迭代审查来确定主题。结果:与患者-提供者一致性相关的主要主题包括疾病经历的验证,感知提供者在GWI/MUS中的专业知识,以及对提供者的信任。无效,低提供者的专业知识,和不信任减损了一致性。结论:这些研究结果表明,提供者可以通过合法化患者的经历,沟通关于MUS的知识,建立信任来促进与MUS患者的和谐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信