Associations between social media use and loneliness in a cross-national population: do motives for social media use matter?

IF 2.4 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Tore Bonsaksen, Mary Ruffolo, Daicia Price, Janni Leung, Hilde Thygesen, Gary Lamph, Isaac Kabelenga, Amy Østertun Geirdal
{"title":"Associations between social media use and loneliness in a cross-national population: do motives for social media use matter?","authors":"Tore Bonsaksen,&nbsp;Mary Ruffolo,&nbsp;Daicia Price,&nbsp;Janni Leung,&nbsp;Hilde Thygesen,&nbsp;Gary Lamph,&nbsp;Isaac Kabelenga,&nbsp;Amy Østertun Geirdal","doi":"10.1080/21642850.2022.2158089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to examine the association between social media use and loneliness two years after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 1649 adults who completed a cross-sectional online survey disseminated openly in Norway, United Kingdom, USA, and Australia between November 2021 and January 2022. Linear regressions examined time spent on social media and participants' characteristics on loneliness, and interactions by motives for social media use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who worried more about their health and were younger, not employed, and without a spouse or partner reported higher levels of loneliness compared to their counterparts. More time spent on social media was associated with more loneliness (<i>β</i> = 0.12, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Three profile groups emerged for social media use motives: 1) social media use motive ratings on avoiding difficult feelings higher or the same as for maintaining contact; 2) slightly higher ratings for maintaining contact; and 3) substantially higher ratings for maintaining contact. Time spent on social media was significant only in motive profile groups 2 and 3 (<i>β</i> = 0.12 and <i>β</i> = 0.14, both <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that people who use social media for the motive of maintaining their relationships feel lonelier than those who spend the same amount of time on social media for other reasons. While social media may facilitate social contact to a degree, they may not facilitate the type of contact sought by those who use social media primarily for this reason.</p>","PeriodicalId":12891,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/ba/RHPB_11_2158089.PMC9817115.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2022.2158089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: We aimed to examine the association between social media use and loneliness two years after the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak.

Methods: Participants were 1649 adults who completed a cross-sectional online survey disseminated openly in Norway, United Kingdom, USA, and Australia between November 2021 and January 2022. Linear regressions examined time spent on social media and participants' characteristics on loneliness, and interactions by motives for social media use.

Results: Participants who worried more about their health and were younger, not employed, and without a spouse or partner reported higher levels of loneliness compared to their counterparts. More time spent on social media was associated with more loneliness (β = 0.12, p < 0.001). Three profile groups emerged for social media use motives: 1) social media use motive ratings on avoiding difficult feelings higher or the same as for maintaining contact; 2) slightly higher ratings for maintaining contact; and 3) substantially higher ratings for maintaining contact. Time spent on social media was significant only in motive profile groups 2 and 3 (β = 0.12 and β = 0.14, both p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that people who use social media for the motive of maintaining their relationships feel lonelier than those who spend the same amount of time on social media for other reasons. While social media may facilitate social contact to a degree, they may not facilitate the type of contact sought by those who use social media primarily for this reason.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

跨国人群中社交媒体使用与孤独感之间的关系:社交媒体使用的动机重要吗?
背景:我们的目的是在COVID-19大流行爆发两年后研究社交媒体使用与孤独感之间的关系。方法:参与者是1649名成年人,他们完成了一项横断面在线调查,于2021年11月至2022年1月在挪威、英国、美国和澳大利亚公开发布。线性回归分析了在社交媒体上花费的时间和参与者的孤独特征,以及社交媒体使用动机的互动。结果:那些更担心自己健康、年轻、没有工作、没有配偶或伴侣的参与者报告的孤独感比他们的同行要高。在社交媒体上花费更多的时间与更多的孤独感相关(β = 0.12, p β = 0.12和β = 0.14,均为p)结论:我们的研究结果表明,出于维持人际关系的动机使用社交媒体的人比出于其他原因花费相同时间在社交媒体上的人感到更孤独。虽然社交媒体可以在一定程度上促进社会联系,但它们可能不会促进那些主要出于这个原因使用社交媒体的人所寻求的联系类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
57
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine: an Open Access Journal (HPBM) publishes theoretical and empirical contributions on all aspects of research and practice into psychosocial, behavioral and biomedical aspects of health. HPBM publishes international, interdisciplinary research with diverse methodological approaches on: Assessment and diagnosis Narratives, experiences and discourses of health and illness Treatment processes and recovery Health cognitions and behaviors at population and individual levels Psychosocial an behavioral prevention interventions Psychosocial determinants and consequences of behavior Social and cultural contexts of health and illness, health disparities Health, illness and medicine Application of advanced information and communication technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信