Decisions to admit vs. discharge patients with acute heart failure from the emergency department: consistency with a measure of severity of decompensation and the impact on prognosis.

Òscar Miró, Pere Llorens, Víctor Gil, María Pilar López Díez, Javier Jacob, Pablo Herrero, Lluís Llauger, Josep Tost, Alfons Aguirre, Carlos Bibiano, Marta Fuentes, María Luisa López Grima, Rodolfo Romero, Enrique Martín Mojarro, Aitor Alquézar Arbé, Héctor Alonso, Francisco Javier Martín-Sánchez
{"title":"Decisions to admit vs. discharge patients with acute heart failure from the emergency department: consistency with a measure of severity of decompensation and the impact on prognosis.","authors":"Òscar Miró, Pere Llorens, Víctor Gil, María Pilar López Díez, Javier Jacob, Pablo Herrero, Lluís Llauger, Josep Tost, Alfons Aguirre, Carlos Bibiano, Marta Fuentes, María Luisa López Grima, Rodolfo Romero, Enrique Martín Mojarro, Aitor Alquézar Arbé, Héctor Alonso, Francisco Javier Martín-Sánchez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the consistency between decisions to discharge or admit patients with acute heart failure (AHF) treated in emergency departments (EDs) and the level of risk of adverse events, and to analyze the impact of decisions to discharge patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Prospective study of baseline clinical data collected from patients diagnosed with AHF in 16 Spanish emergency departments. Patients were stratified by severity of decompensated AHF based on MEESSI assessment (Multiple Estimation of Risk Based on the Spanish Emergency Department Score). The distribution of severity was described for patients who were hospitalized (overall and for departments receiving the largest number of admissions) and for discharged patients. We analyzed the data for discharged patients for associations with the following quality-of-care indicators: all-cause mortality of less than 2% at 30 days, revisits to the ED for AHF in less than 10% of patients within 7 days of discharge, and revisits to the ED or admission for AHF in less than 20% within 30 days of discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2855 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 84 (76-88) years. Fifty-four percent were women, 1042 (36.5%) were classified as low risk, 1239 (43.4%) as intermediate risk, 301 (10.5%) as high risk, and 273 (9.6%) as very high risk. Thirty-day mortality rates by level of low to very high risk were 1.9%, 9.3%, 15.3%, and 38.4%, respectively. One-year mortality rates by risk level were 15.4%, 35.6%, 52.0%, and 74.2%. Admission rates by risk level were 62.2%, 77.4%, 87.0%, and 88.3%. Overall, 47.1% o patients discharged from the ED were in the 3 higher-risk categories (intermediate to very high), and 30.7% were in the lowest risk category. The 5 hospital areas receiving the most admissions, in order of lowest-to-highest risk classification, were internal medicine, the short-stay unit, cardiology, intensive care, and geriatrics. Rates and 95% CIs for quality-of-care indicators in patients discharged from EDs were as follows: 30-day mortality, 4.3% (3.0%-6.1%); ED revisits within 7 days, 11.4% (9.2%-14.0%), and ED revisits or admissions within 30 days, 31.5% (28.0%-35.1%). In patients classified as low risk on ED discharge, these percentages were lower, as follows, respectively: 0.5% (0.1%-1.8%), 10.5% (7.6%-14.0%), and 29.5% (26.6%-32.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We detected disparity between severity of AHF decompensation and the decision to discharge or admit patients. Outcomes in patients discharged from EDs do not reach the recommended quality-of-care standards. Reducing inconsistencies between severity of decompensation and ED decisions could help to improve quality targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":11644,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"35 4","pages":"261-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the consistency between decisions to discharge or admit patients with acute heart failure (AHF) treated in emergency departments (EDs) and the level of risk of adverse events, and to analyze the impact of decisions to discharge patients.

Material and methods: Prospective study of baseline clinical data collected from patients diagnosed with AHF in 16 Spanish emergency departments. Patients were stratified by severity of decompensated AHF based on MEESSI assessment (Multiple Estimation of Risk Based on the Spanish Emergency Department Score). The distribution of severity was described for patients who were hospitalized (overall and for departments receiving the largest number of admissions) and for discharged patients. We analyzed the data for discharged patients for associations with the following quality-of-care indicators: all-cause mortality of less than 2% at 30 days, revisits to the ED for AHF in less than 10% of patients within 7 days of discharge, and revisits to the ED or admission for AHF in less than 20% within 30 days of discharge.

Results: We included 2855 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 84 (76-88) years. Fifty-four percent were women, 1042 (36.5%) were classified as low risk, 1239 (43.4%) as intermediate risk, 301 (10.5%) as high risk, and 273 (9.6%) as very high risk. Thirty-day mortality rates by level of low to very high risk were 1.9%, 9.3%, 15.3%, and 38.4%, respectively. One-year mortality rates by risk level were 15.4%, 35.6%, 52.0%, and 74.2%. Admission rates by risk level were 62.2%, 77.4%, 87.0%, and 88.3%. Overall, 47.1% o patients discharged from the ED were in the 3 higher-risk categories (intermediate to very high), and 30.7% were in the lowest risk category. The 5 hospital areas receiving the most admissions, in order of lowest-to-highest risk classification, were internal medicine, the short-stay unit, cardiology, intensive care, and geriatrics. Rates and 95% CIs for quality-of-care indicators in patients discharged from EDs were as follows: 30-day mortality, 4.3% (3.0%-6.1%); ED revisits within 7 days, 11.4% (9.2%-14.0%), and ED revisits or admissions within 30 days, 31.5% (28.0%-35.1%). In patients classified as low risk on ED discharge, these percentages were lower, as follows, respectively: 0.5% (0.1%-1.8%), 10.5% (7.6%-14.0%), and 29.5% (26.6%-32.6%).

Conclusion: We detected disparity between severity of AHF decompensation and the decision to discharge or admit patients. Outcomes in patients discharged from EDs do not reach the recommended quality-of-care standards. Reducing inconsistencies between severity of decompensation and ED decisions could help to improve quality targets.

急诊科急性心力衰竭患者入院与出院的决定:与失代偿严重程度衡量标准的一致性以及对预后的影响。
目的分析急诊科治疗的急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者出院或住院决定与不良事件风险水平之间的一致性,并分析出院决定的影响:前瞻性研究收集了 16 个西班牙急诊科诊断为急性心力衰竭患者的基线临床数据。根据 MEESSI 评估(基于西班牙急诊科评分的多重风险评估),按失代偿性 AHF 的严重程度对患者进行分层。我们对住院患者(总体和住院人数最多的科室)和出院患者的严重程度分布进行了描述。我们对出院患者的数据进行了分析,以确定其与以下护理质量指标之间的关联:30 天内全因死亡率低于 2%;出院后 7 天内因 AHF 再次就诊急诊科的患者比例低于 10%;出院后 30 天内因 AHF 再次就诊急诊科或入院的患者比例低于 20%:我们共收治了 2855 名患者,中位数(四分位数间距)年龄为 84(76-88)岁。其中54%为女性,1042人(36.5%)被归类为低风险,1239人(43.4%)被归类为中风险,301人(10.5%)被归类为高风险,273人(9.6%)被归类为极高风险。从低风险到极高风险的 30 天死亡率分别为 1.9%、9.3%、15.3% 和 38.4%。按风险等级划分的一年死亡率分别为 15.4%、35.6%、52.0% 和 74.2%。按风险等级划分的入院率分别为 62.2%、77.4%、87.0% 和 88.3%。总体而言,47.1% 的急诊室出院病人属于三个较高风险类别(中度至极高风险),30.7% 属于最低风险类别。入院人数最多的 5 个病区依次为内科、短期住院部、心脏科、重症监护室和老年病科,风险等级由低到高依次为内科、短期住院部、心脏科、重症监护室和老年病科。急诊室出院患者的护理质量指标的比率和 95% CI 如下:30天死亡率为4.3%(3.0%-6.1%);7天内急诊室复诊率为11.4%(9.2%-14.0%),30天内急诊室复诊或住院率为31.5%(28.0%-35.1%)。在急诊室出院时被归类为低风险的患者中,这些百分比较低,分别为结论:在急诊室出院时被归类为低风险的患者中,这些比例较低,分别为 0.5%(0.1%-1.8%)、10.5%(7.6%-14.0%)和 29.5%(26.6%-32.6%):结论:我们发现 AHF 失代偿的严重程度与患者出院或住院的决定之间存在差异。结论:我们发现 AHF 失代偿的严重程度与患者出院或入院的决定之间存在差异,急诊室出院患者的治疗效果未达到建议的护理质量标准。减少失代偿严重程度与急诊室决定之间的不一致性有助于提高质量目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信