Bicarbonate in Arteries Measured Preoperatively for Cadaveric Single-lung Transplantation is Related to Intraoperative Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use: A Retrospective Preliminary Study.

IF 0.3 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION
N Kobayashi, H Toyama, R Kubo, Y Matsuda, Y Okada, Y Ejima, M Yamauchi
{"title":"Bicarbonate in Arteries Measured Preoperatively for Cadaveric Single-lung Transplantation is Related to Intraoperative Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use: A Retrospective Preliminary Study.","authors":"N Kobayashi,&nbsp;H Toyama,&nbsp;R Kubo,&nbsp;Y Matsuda,&nbsp;Y Okada,&nbsp;Y Ejima,&nbsp;M Yamauchi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no known predictors of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) induction for single lung transplantation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the present study was to clarify the relationship between variables and ECMO requirements in single lung transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included adult patients who underwent cadaveric single lung transplantation between 2010 and 2019. After general anesthesia, the transplanted lungs were ventilated in all cases. The analysis included 38 patients in the ECMO required (RQ) group and 12 patients in the ECMO non-required (FR) group. Comparisons were made between the two groups for data affecting ECMO implementation, and data that were significantly different were subjected to multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to anesthesia, the bicarbonate (HCO3-) value of the FR group was lower than that of the RQ group (24.6±2.7 vs. 29.7±5.3 mmol/L, p=0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that the cut-off bicarbonate value was 29.6. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the model was 0.869 (R2: 0.331), with a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 88%. The odds ratio was 1.63 for every unit increase in the bicarbonate value (95%CI: 1.11-2.39, p<0.001). Further, the FR group had higher arterial blood pressure (mean: 79.0±11.5 vs. 68.9±8.3 mmHg, p=0.030), less blood loss (432±385 vs. 1,623±1,997 g, p<0.001), shorter operation time (417±44 vs. 543±111 min, p<0.001), and shorter ICU stay (11±9 vs. 25±38 days, p=0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative evaluation of bicarbonate could predict the need for ECMO for single lung transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14242,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine","volume":"12 4","pages":"37-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758997/pdf/ijotm-12-37.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are no known predictors of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) induction for single lung transplantation.

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to clarify the relationship between variables and ECMO requirements in single lung transplantation.

Methods: This study included adult patients who underwent cadaveric single lung transplantation between 2010 and 2019. After general anesthesia, the transplanted lungs were ventilated in all cases. The analysis included 38 patients in the ECMO required (RQ) group and 12 patients in the ECMO non-required (FR) group. Comparisons were made between the two groups for data affecting ECMO implementation, and data that were significantly different were subjected to multivariate analysis.

Results: Prior to anesthesia, the bicarbonate (HCO3-) value of the FR group was lower than that of the RQ group (24.6±2.7 vs. 29.7±5.3 mmol/L, p=0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that the cut-off bicarbonate value was 29.6. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the model was 0.869 (R2: 0.331), with a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 88%. The odds ratio was 1.63 for every unit increase in the bicarbonate value (95%CI: 1.11-2.39, p<0.001). Further, the FR group had higher arterial blood pressure (mean: 79.0±11.5 vs. 68.9±8.3 mmHg, p=0.030), less blood loss (432±385 vs. 1,623±1,997 g, p<0.001), shorter operation time (417±44 vs. 543±111 min, p<0.001), and shorter ICU stay (11±9 vs. 25±38 days, p=0.039).

Conclusion: Preoperative evaluation of bicarbonate could predict the need for ECMO for single lung transplantation.

尸体单肺移植术前测量动脉碳酸氢盐与术中体外膜氧合使用有关:一项回顾性初步研究。
背景:目前还没有已知的预测单肺移植诱导体外膜氧合(ECMO)的因素。目的:本研究的目的是澄清变量与单肺移植ECMO需求之间的关系。方法:本研究纳入了2010年至2019年间接受尸体单肺移植的成年患者。全麻后,移植肺通气。该分析包括38例需要ECMO (RQ)组患者和12例不需要ECMO (FR)组患者。比较两组影响ECMO实施的数据,对差异显著的数据进行多变量分析。结果:麻醉前,FR组碳酸氢盐(HCO3-)值低于RQ组(24.6±2.7 vs. 29.7±5.3 mmol/L, p=0.005)。多变量分析显示,碳酸氢盐临界值为29.6。该模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.869 (R2: 0.331),灵敏度为79%,特异性为88%。碳酸氢盐值每增加一个单位,优势比为1.63 (95%CI: 1.11-2.39)。结论:术前碳酸氢盐评估可预测单肺移植是否需要ECMO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine (IJOTM) is a quarterly peer-reviewed English-language journal that publishes high-quality basic sciences and clinical research on transplantation. The scope of the journal includes organ and tissue donation, procurement and preservation; surgical techniques, innovations, and novelties in all aspects of transplantation; genomics and immunobiology; immunosuppressive drugs and pharmacology relevant to transplantation; graft survival and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure; clinical trials and population analyses in the field of transplantation; transplant complications; cell and tissue transplantation; infection; post-transplant malignancies; sociological and ethical issues and xenotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信