The use of protection measures in dento-maxillofacial radiology in Europe: a survey among experts.

Q3 Medicine
Swiss dental journal Pub Date : 2023-01-09 Epub Date: 2022-09-13 DOI:10.61872/sdj-2023-01-01
Fabienne M Rusch, Michael M Bornstein, Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt
{"title":"The use of protection measures in dento-maxillofacial radiology in Europe: a survey among experts.","authors":"Fabienne M Rusch, Michael M Bornstein, Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt","doi":"10.61872/sdj-2023-01-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient contact shielding to reduce radiation exposure to radiosensitive organs of patients is known to be used inconsistently in the field of dento-maxillofacial radiology (DMFR). There is an ongoing discussion if its use is still justified with regard to recent technical enhancements in the field. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the recommended and applied safety standards regarding dose protection measures in dental radiology within European countries. With an online questionnaire the use of safety measures, especially lead protection and collimation, in different patient groups (adults, children, pregnant women) was interrogated including leading experts in the field of DMFR. Among the 24 participants from 13 different countries, there was a tendency towards lead protection for intraoral radiography and towards collimation for extraoral radiography. Participants based their decision mainly on law and societal guidelines. Overall, the application of radiation protection measures varies within Europe. It seems safe to say that lead protection as a measure of radiation dose limitation is still recommendable even though collimation and technical advancements have led to great dose reductions. Collimation should be used more broadly and a standardization of protection measures and an update of radiation protection guidelines in Europe is desirable.</p>","PeriodicalId":38153,"journal":{"name":"Swiss dental journal","volume":"133 1","pages":"12-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61872/sdj-2023-01-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient contact shielding to reduce radiation exposure to radiosensitive organs of patients is known to be used inconsistently in the field of dento-maxillofacial radiology (DMFR). There is an ongoing discussion if its use is still justified with regard to recent technical enhancements in the field. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the recommended and applied safety standards regarding dose protection measures in dental radiology within European countries. With an online questionnaire the use of safety measures, especially lead protection and collimation, in different patient groups (adults, children, pregnant women) was interrogated including leading experts in the field of DMFR. Among the 24 participants from 13 different countries, there was a tendency towards lead protection for intraoral radiography and towards collimation for extraoral radiography. Participants based their decision mainly on law and societal guidelines. Overall, the application of radiation protection measures varies within Europe. It seems safe to say that lead protection as a measure of radiation dose limitation is still recommendable even though collimation and technical advancements have led to great dose reductions. Collimation should be used more broadly and a standardization of protection measures and an update of radiation protection guidelines in Europe is desirable.

欧洲牙颌面放射学保护措施的使用情况:专家调查。
众所周知,在牙颌面放射学(DMFR)领域,为减少对患者辐射敏感器官的辐射照射而使用的患者接触屏蔽并不统一。鉴于该领域最近的技术进步,人们一直在讨论是否仍有理由使用这种方法。因此,本研究旨在调查欧洲各国牙科放射剂量保护措施的推荐和应用安全标准。通过在线问卷调查,对不同患者群体(成人、儿童、孕妇)使用安全措施,尤其是铅防护和准直的情况进行了调查,其中包括牙科放射治疗领域的主要专家。来自 13 个不同国家的 24 位参与者倾向于在口腔内放射摄影中使用铅防护措施,在口腔外放射摄影中使用准直装置。与会者主要根据法律和社会准则做出决定。总的来说,欧洲各国对辐射防护措施的应用各不相同。可以说,尽管准直技术和技术进步已经大大降低了辐射剂量,但铅防护作为一种限制辐射剂量的措施仍然值得推荐。准直法应该得到更广泛的应用,欧洲应该实现防护措施的标准化并更新辐射防护指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss dental journal
Swiss dental journal Dentistry-Dentistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Fondé en 1891 et lu par tous les médecins-dentistes ou presque qui exercent en Suisse, le SWISS DENTAL JOURNAL SSO est l’organe de publication scientifique de la Société suisse des médecins-dentistes SSO. Il publie des articles qui sont reconnus pour la formation continue et informe sur l’actualité en médecine dentaire et dans le domaine de la politique professionnelle de la SSO.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信