Inter-Examiner Agreement of the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association Analysis of the Atlas Subluxation Complex in a 3-View Upper Cervical Radiographic Series

Jordan Landholm-Duvall DC, DCCJP , D. Gordon Hasick DC , Harrison Ndetan MPH, MD, PhD , John F. Hart DC, MHSc , Marshall Dickholtz Jr DC , Craig P. Lapenski DC
{"title":"Inter-Examiner Agreement of the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association Analysis of the Atlas Subluxation Complex in a 3-View Upper Cervical Radiographic Series","authors":"Jordan Landholm-Duvall DC, DCCJP ,&nbsp;D. Gordon Hasick DC ,&nbsp;Harrison Ndetan MPH, MD, PhD ,&nbsp;John F. Hart DC, MHSc ,&nbsp;Marshall Dickholtz Jr DC ,&nbsp;Craig P. Lapenski DC","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2023.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to measure the inter-examiner agreement between radiograph markings of 2 National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association board-certified chiropractors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two chiropractic examiners who had standardized training marked and analyzed 254 conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets. The level of agreement and potential biases in their measurements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement and Bland-Altman plot analyses.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was 96.1% agreement between the examiners in the measurements of the side of atlas laterality and 94.5% for atlas rotation. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96) for atlas laterality and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94) for atlas rotation. The mean difference in the measurement between the 2 examiners was −0.11, <em>P</em> = .12 for atlas laterality and 0.05, <em>P</em> = .55 for atlas rotation. Neither atlas laterality nor atlas rotation measurements were significantly different from zero. Bland-Altman plots were not suggestive of any proportional biases in the 2 measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results of this study show almost perfect agreement between 2 trained chiropractic examiners, with no apparent proportional bias in the analysis of conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370723000238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to measure the inter-examiner agreement between radiograph markings of 2 National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association board-certified chiropractors.

Methods

Two chiropractic examiners who had standardized training marked and analyzed 254 conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets. The level of agreement and potential biases in their measurements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients for absolute agreement and Bland-Altman plot analyses.

Results

There was 96.1% agreement between the examiners in the measurements of the side of atlas laterality and 94.5% for atlas rotation. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96) for atlas laterality and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94) for atlas rotation. The mean difference in the measurement between the 2 examiners was −0.11, P = .12 for atlas laterality and 0.05, P = .55 for atlas rotation. Neither atlas laterality nor atlas rotation measurements were significantly different from zero. Bland-Altman plots were not suggestive of any proportional biases in the 2 measurements.

Conclusion

Results of this study show almost perfect agreement between 2 trained chiropractic examiners, with no apparent proportional bias in the analysis of conventional orthogonal radiographic film sets.

全国上颈椎捏脊协会的检查人员之间的一致意见:三视图上颈椎x线片系列中寰椎半脱位复合体的分析
目的本研究的目的是测量2名全国上颈按摩协会认证的按摩师的x线片标记之间的一致性。方法2名接受过标准化训练的捏脊检查员对254组常规正交x线片进行评分分析。使用绝对一致性的类内相关系数和Bland-Altman图分析来评估其测量中的一致性水平和潜在偏差。结果检查者对寰椎侧边测量的一致性为96.1%,对寰椎旋转测量的一致性为94.5%。寰椎侧侧的类内相关系数为0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96),寰椎旋转的类内相关系数为0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94)。两名检查者测量结果的平均差异为- 0.11,寰椎侧侧P = 0.12,寰椎旋转P = 0.05, P = 0.55。寰椎横向和寰椎旋转测量值均与零无显著差异。Bland-Altman图在两次测量中没有提示任何比例偏差。结论两名训练有素的捏脊检查人员的研究结果几乎完全一致,在传统的正交x线片组分析中没有明显的比例偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信