Experiences With In-Person and Virtual Health Care Services for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study.

Q2 Medicine
Thea Krag, Emma Højgaard Jørgensen, Klaus Phanareth, Lars Kayser
{"title":"Experiences With In-Person and Virtual Health Care Services for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Thea Krag,&nbsp;Emma Højgaard Jørgensen,&nbsp;Klaus Phanareth,&nbsp;Lars Kayser","doi":"10.2196/43237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization and the European Commission predict increased use of health technologies in the future care for patients in Europe. Studies have shown that services based on telehealth, which includes components of education, as well as rehabilitation initiatives can support the self-management of individuals living with COPD. This raises an interest in how virtual and in-person interactions and roles can best be organized in a way that suits people living with COPD in relation to their treatment and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate how individuals living with COPD experience different combinations of virtual and in-person care, to help us better understand what aspects are valued and how to best combine elements of these services in future care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two rounds of semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 and 4 informants, respectively. The individuals were all recruited in relation to a research project led by the telehealth initiative Epital Health. The first round of interviews included 11 informants, as 2 dropped out. Of these, 7 received the telemedicine service provided by Epital Health, 3 participated in a 12-week COPD program provided by their respective municipality, and 1 did not receive any supplementary service besides the usual care. In the second round, which included 4 informants, all had at one point received the telemedicine service and participated in a municipality-based rehabilitation program. A content analysis of the interviews was performed based on deductive coding with 4 categories, namely, (1) Self-management, (2) Health-related support, (3) Digital context, and (4) Well-being.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medical and emotional support from health care professionals is a key aspect of care for individuals with COPD. Acute treatment with at-home medicine, monitoring one's own condition through technology, and having easy access and close contact with health care professionals familiar to them can promote self-management and well-being, as well as provide a feeling of security. Having regular meetings with a network of peers and health care professionals provides education, support, and tools to cope with the condition and improve own health. Furthermore, group-based activity motivates and increases the activity level of the individuals. Continued offers of services are desired as many experience a decrease in achieved benefits after the service ends. More emphasis is placed on the importance of the therapeutic and medical elements of care compared with factors such as technology. The identified barriers related to optimal utilization of the virtual service were related to differentiation in levels of contact depending on disease severity and skills related to the practical use of equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combination of virtual and in-person services providing lasting medical and social support is suggested for the future. This should build upon the preferences and needs of individuals living with COPD and support relationships to caregivers and peers.</p>","PeriodicalId":36224,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","volume":"10 ","pages":"e43237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10463085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/43237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization and the European Commission predict increased use of health technologies in the future care for patients in Europe. Studies have shown that services based on telehealth, which includes components of education, as well as rehabilitation initiatives can support the self-management of individuals living with COPD. This raises an interest in how virtual and in-person interactions and roles can best be organized in a way that suits people living with COPD in relation to their treatment and rehabilitation.

Objective: This study aims to investigate how individuals living with COPD experience different combinations of virtual and in-person care, to help us better understand what aspects are valued and how to best combine elements of these services in future care.

Methods: Two rounds of semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 and 4 informants, respectively. The individuals were all recruited in relation to a research project led by the telehealth initiative Epital Health. The first round of interviews included 11 informants, as 2 dropped out. Of these, 7 received the telemedicine service provided by Epital Health, 3 participated in a 12-week COPD program provided by their respective municipality, and 1 did not receive any supplementary service besides the usual care. In the second round, which included 4 informants, all had at one point received the telemedicine service and participated in a municipality-based rehabilitation program. A content analysis of the interviews was performed based on deductive coding with 4 categories, namely, (1) Self-management, (2) Health-related support, (3) Digital context, and (4) Well-being.

Results: Medical and emotional support from health care professionals is a key aspect of care for individuals with COPD. Acute treatment with at-home medicine, monitoring one's own condition through technology, and having easy access and close contact with health care professionals familiar to them can promote self-management and well-being, as well as provide a feeling of security. Having regular meetings with a network of peers and health care professionals provides education, support, and tools to cope with the condition and improve own health. Furthermore, group-based activity motivates and increases the activity level of the individuals. Continued offers of services are desired as many experience a decrease in achieved benefits after the service ends. More emphasis is placed on the importance of the therapeutic and medical elements of care compared with factors such as technology. The identified barriers related to optimal utilization of the virtual service were related to differentiation in levels of contact depending on disease severity and skills related to the practical use of equipment.

Conclusions: A combination of virtual and in-person services providing lasting medical and social support is suggested for the future. This should build upon the preferences and needs of individuals living with COPD and support relationships to caregivers and peers.

Abstract Image

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的面对面和虚拟卫生保健服务经验:定性研究。
背景:世界卫生组织和欧洲委员会预测,未来欧洲对患者的护理将增加卫生技术的使用。研究表明,基于远程保健的服务(包括教育的组成部分)以及康复举措可以支持慢性阻塞性肺病患者的自我管理。这引起了人们的兴趣,即如何以最适合COPD患者治疗和康复的方式组织虚拟和面对面的互动和角色。目的:本研究旨在调查慢性阻塞性肺病患者如何体验虚拟和面对面护理的不同组合,以帮助我们更好地了解哪些方面是有价值的,以及如何在未来的护理中最好地结合这些服务的要素。方法:采用两轮半结构化访谈法,分别对13名和4名被调查者进行访谈。这些人都是在远程医疗倡议“首都健康”领导的一个研究项目中招募的。第一轮采访包括11名举报人,其中2人退出。其中,7人接受了Epital Health提供的远程医疗服务,3人参加了由各自所在城市提供的为期12周的COPD项目,1人除了常规护理外没有接受任何补充服务。在第二轮调查中,包括4名举报人,他们都曾接受过远程医疗服务,并参加了以市政为基础的康复计划。基于演绎编码对访谈进行内容分析,分为4个类别,即(1)自我管理,(2)健康相关支持,(3)数字环境和(4)幸福感。结果:医疗保健专业人员的医疗和情感支持是COPD患者护理的关键方面。使用家庭药物进行急性治疗,通过技术监测自己的病情,并与熟悉的卫生保健专业人员轻松接触和密切联系,可以促进自我管理和福祉,并提供一种安全感。定期与同龄人和卫生保健专业人员举行会议,为应对这种情况和改善自己的健康提供教育、支持和工具。此外,以群体为基础的活动激励和提高了个人的活动水平。由于许多人在服务结束后所获得的收益减少,因此希望继续提供服务。与技术等因素相比,更强调护理的治疗和医疗因素的重要性。所确定的与最佳利用虚拟服务有关的障碍与根据疾病严重程度和与设备实际使用有关的技能而存在的接触程度差异有关。结论:未来建议将虚拟服务和面对面服务相结合,提供持久的医疗和社会支持。这应以慢性阻塞性肺病患者的偏好和需求为基础,并支持与护理人员和同伴的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信