Effect of Active Surgical Co-Management by Medical Hospitalists in Urology Inpatient Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Eun Sun Kim, Jung Hun Ohn, Yejee Lim, Jongchan Lee, Hye Won Kim, Sun-Wook Kim, Jiwon Ryu, Hee-Sun Park, Jae Ho Cho, Jong Jin Oh, Seok-Soo Byun, Hak Chul Jang, Nak-Hyun Kim
{"title":"Effect of Active Surgical Co-Management by Medical Hospitalists in Urology Inpatient Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Eun Sun Kim,&nbsp;Jung Hun Ohn,&nbsp;Yejee Lim,&nbsp;Jongchan Lee,&nbsp;Hye Won Kim,&nbsp;Sun-Wook Kim,&nbsp;Jiwon Ryu,&nbsp;Hee-Sun Park,&nbsp;Jae Ho Cho,&nbsp;Jong Jin Oh,&nbsp;Seok-Soo Byun,&nbsp;Hak Chul Jang,&nbsp;Nak-Hyun Kim","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2023.0143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the use of active surgical co-management (SCM) by medical hospitalists for urology inpatient care.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Since March 2019, a hospitalist-SCM program was implemented at a tertiary-care medical center, and a retrospective cohort study was conducted among co-managed urology inpatients. We assessed the clinical outcomes of urology inpatients who received SCM and compared passive SCM (co-management of patients by hospitalists only on request; March 2019 to June 2020) with active SCM (co-management of patients based on active screening by hospitalists; July 2020 to October 2021). We also evaluated the perceptions of patients who received SCM toward inpatient care quality, safety, and subjective satisfaction with inpatient care at discharge or when transferred to other wards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed 525 patients. Compared with the passive SCM group (n=205), patients in the active SCM group (n=320) required co-management for a significantly shorter duration (<i>p</i>=0.012) and tended to have a shorter length of stay at the urology ward (<i>p</i>=0.062) and less frequent unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge (<i>p</i>=0.095) while triggering significantly fewer events of rapid response team activation (<i>p</i>=0.002). No differences were found in the proportion of patients transferred to the intensive care unit, in-hospital mortality rates, or inpatient care questionnaire scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Active surveillance and co-management of urology inpatients by medical hospitalists can improve the quality and efficacy of inpatient care without compromising subjective inpatient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/01/cb/ymj-64-558.PMC10462814.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the use of active surgical co-management (SCM) by medical hospitalists for urology inpatient care.

Materials and methods: Since March 2019, a hospitalist-SCM program was implemented at a tertiary-care medical center, and a retrospective cohort study was conducted among co-managed urology inpatients. We assessed the clinical outcomes of urology inpatients who received SCM and compared passive SCM (co-management of patients by hospitalists only on request; March 2019 to June 2020) with active SCM (co-management of patients based on active screening by hospitalists; July 2020 to October 2021). We also evaluated the perceptions of patients who received SCM toward inpatient care quality, safety, and subjective satisfaction with inpatient care at discharge or when transferred to other wards.

Results: We assessed 525 patients. Compared with the passive SCM group (n=205), patients in the active SCM group (n=320) required co-management for a significantly shorter duration (p=0.012) and tended to have a shorter length of stay at the urology ward (p=0.062) and less frequent unplanned readmissions within 30 days of discharge (p=0.095) while triggering significantly fewer events of rapid response team activation (p=0.002). No differences were found in the proportion of patients transferred to the intensive care unit, in-hospital mortality rates, or inpatient care questionnaire scores.

Conclusion: Active surveillance and co-management of urology inpatients by medical hospitalists can improve the quality and efficacy of inpatient care without compromising subjective inpatient satisfaction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项回顾性队列研究:医院医师积极外科联合管理对泌尿外科住院病人护理的影响。
目的:本研究旨在评估医院医师在泌尿外科住院病人护理中主动手术共同管理(SCM)的使用情况。材料与方法:自2019年3月起,在一家三级医疗中心实施了一项住院医师- scm项目,并对共同管理的泌尿科住院患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们评估了接受SCM的泌尿科住院患者的临床结果,并比较了被动SCM(仅应要求由医院医生共同管理患者;2019年3月至2020年6月),积极SCM(基于医院主动筛查的患者共同管理;2020年7月至2021年10月)。我们还评估了接受SCM的患者对住院护理质量、安全性的看法,以及出院时或转到其他病房时对住院护理的主观满意度。结果:我们评估了525例患者。与被动SCM组(n=205)相比,主动SCM组(n=320)患者需要共同管理的时间明显更短(p=0.012),在泌尿科病房的住院时间更短(p=0.062),出院后30天内意外再入院的频率更低(p=0.095),触发快速反应小组激活的事件明显更少(p=0.002)。在转入重症监护病房的患者比例、住院死亡率或住院护理问卷得分方面没有发现差异。结论:医院医师对泌尿外科住院患者进行积极监测和共同管理,可以在不影响患者主观满意度的前提下提高住院护理质量和效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信