Evaluation of Cage Mate-induced Postsurgical Trauma in Mice.

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Noé Tirado-Muñiz, Tatum L Spangler, Hollie Van Rooyen, Jason B Oakes, Bernard J Doerning, Mark A Suckow
{"title":"Evaluation of Cage Mate-induced Postsurgical Trauma in Mice.","authors":"Noé Tirado-Muñiz,&nbsp;Tatum L Spangler,&nbsp;Hollie Van Rooyen,&nbsp;Jason B Oakes,&nbsp;Bernard J Doerning,&nbsp;Mark A Suckow","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although mice are social animals, individual housing is sometimes requested after surgery. We questioned whether pair-housing mice after surgery resulted in greater trauma to the surgical site as compared with single housing. We further evaluated the effect of individual housing after surgery on the wellbeing of mice that had previously been pair-housed. Female C57Bl/6 mice (age, 6 to 8 wk) were housed as follows: group A, individually housed before and after surgery (<i>n</i> = 10; all 10 mice underwent surgery); group B, pair-housed before surgery but individually housed after surgery (<i>n</i> = 10; all 10 mice received surgery); group C, pair-housed before and after surgery (<i>n</i> = 20; 10 mice underwent surgery but their cage mates did not); and group D, pair-housed before and after surgery (<i>n</i> = 10; all 10 mice underwent surgery). Dependent variables were body weight, body condition, grimace based on real-time scoring, nest building, time to incorporate into nest test (TINT) score, wound trauma score, and missing wound clips. Weight was significantly different between groups A and C both before and after surgery. Mean nest building scores were significantly higher for pair-housed (groups C and D) than for individually housed mice (groups A and B) after surgery while TINT scores were significantly higher for these same groups both before and after surgery. Mean values for body condition, grimace score, wound score, and number of wound clips missing did not differ significantly between any groups either before or after surgery. Taken together, these results suggest that pair housing mice after surgery benefited their wellbeing but did not increase trauma to the surgical incision site or disturb wound clips as compared with individually housed mice. Furthermore, separating previously pair-housed mice (group B) did not affect these measures as compared with individually housed mice (Group A) either before or after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078933/pdf/jaalas2023000170.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although mice are social animals, individual housing is sometimes requested after surgery. We questioned whether pair-housing mice after surgery resulted in greater trauma to the surgical site as compared with single housing. We further evaluated the effect of individual housing after surgery on the wellbeing of mice that had previously been pair-housed. Female C57Bl/6 mice (age, 6 to 8 wk) were housed as follows: group A, individually housed before and after surgery (n = 10; all 10 mice underwent surgery); group B, pair-housed before surgery but individually housed after surgery (n = 10; all 10 mice received surgery); group C, pair-housed before and after surgery (n = 20; 10 mice underwent surgery but their cage mates did not); and group D, pair-housed before and after surgery (n = 10; all 10 mice underwent surgery). Dependent variables were body weight, body condition, grimace based on real-time scoring, nest building, time to incorporate into nest test (TINT) score, wound trauma score, and missing wound clips. Weight was significantly different between groups A and C both before and after surgery. Mean nest building scores were significantly higher for pair-housed (groups C and D) than for individually housed mice (groups A and B) after surgery while TINT scores were significantly higher for these same groups both before and after surgery. Mean values for body condition, grimace score, wound score, and number of wound clips missing did not differ significantly between any groups either before or after surgery. Taken together, these results suggest that pair housing mice after surgery benefited their wellbeing but did not increase trauma to the surgical incision site or disturb wound clips as compared with individually housed mice. Furthermore, separating previously pair-housed mice (group B) did not affect these measures as compared with individually housed mice (Group A) either before or after surgery.

笼内交配对小鼠术后创伤的影响。
虽然老鼠是群居动物,但手术后有时需要单独居住。我们质疑手术后双窝小鼠是否比单窝小鼠对手术部位造成更大的创伤。我们进一步评估了手术后单独饲养对先前成对饲养的小鼠健康的影响。雌性C57Bl/6小鼠(6 ~ 8周龄)按如下方式饲养:A组,术前、术后单独饲养(n = 10);所有10只小鼠都接受了手术);B组术前成对饲养,术后单独饲养(n = 10);所有10只小鼠均接受手术);C组,术前、术后成对饲养(n = 20);10只老鼠接受了手术,但它们的笼子同伴没有);D组手术前后成对饲养(n = 10;所有10只小鼠都接受了手术)。因变量为体重、身体状况、基于实时评分的鬼脸、筑巢、纳入筑巢测试时间(TINT)评分、伤口创伤评分和缺失伤口夹。A、C组患者术前、术后体重差异有统计学意义。术后成对饲养的小鼠(C组和D组)的平均筑巢得分显著高于单独饲养的小鼠(A组和B组),而同一组的TINT得分在术前和术后均显著高于单独饲养的小鼠(A组和B组)。手术前后两组之间的身体状况、鬼脸评分、伤口评分和伤口夹丢失数量的平均值均无显著差异。综上所述,这些结果表明,与单独饲养的小鼠相比,手术后成对饲养的小鼠有益于它们的健康,但不会增加手术切口部位的创伤或扰乱伤口夹。此外,与单独饲养的小鼠(A组)相比,术前或术后将先前成对饲养的小鼠(B组)分开对这些指标没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
35.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS) serves as an official communication vehicle for the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS). The journal includes a section of refereed articles and a section of AALAS association news. All signed articles, including refereed articles and book reviews, editorials, committee reports, and news and commentary, reflect the individual views of the authors and are not official views of AALAS. The mission of the refereed section of the journal is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information on animal biology, technology, facility operations, management, and compliance as relevant to the AALAS membership. JAALAS accepts research reports (data-based) or scholarly reports (literature-based), with the caveat that all articles, including solicited manuscripts, must include appropriate references and must undergo peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信