Thania Maion Melo MSc, Flávia Luciana Lobo Cunha MSc, Laylla Marjorye Rebouças Bezerra MSc, Marianna Salemi MSc, Vanessa Alves de Albuquerque MSc, Geisa Guimaraes de Alencar PhD, Gisela Rocha de Siqueira PhD
{"title":"Abdominal and Diaphragmatic Mobility in Adults With Chronic Gastritis: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Thania Maion Melo MSc, Flávia Luciana Lobo Cunha MSc, Laylla Marjorye Rebouças Bezerra MSc, Marianna Salemi MSc, Vanessa Alves de Albuquerque MSc, Geisa Guimaraes de Alencar PhD, Gisela Rocha de Siqueira PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to assess abdominal and diaphragmatic mobility in adults with chronic gastritis<span> compared with healthy individuals and to analyze the impact of chronic gastritis on musculoskeletal signs and symptoms of the cervical and thoracic spine.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>This was a cross-sectional study conducted by the physiotherapy department at the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco in Brazil. Fifty-seven individuals participated, 28 with chronic gastritis (gastritis group [GG]) and 29 healthy individuals (control group [CG]). We assessed the following: restricted abdominal mobility in the transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes; diaphragmatic mobility; restricted cervical vertebral segmental mobility; restricted thoracic vertebral segmental mobility; and pain on palpation, asymmetry, and density and texture of the soft tissues on the cervical and thoracic spine. The measure of diaphragmatic mobility was assessed with ultrasound imaging. The Fisher exact and χ</span><sup>2</sup> tests were applied to compare the groups (GG and CG) in relation to the restricted mobility of the abdominal tissues near the stomach on all planes and diaphragm, and the independent samples <em>t</em> test to compare the mobility measurements of the diaphragm. A significance level of 5% was considered for all tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Restricted abdominal mobility in all directions (<em>P</em> < .05) was greater in GG when compared with CG except for the counterclockwise direction (<em>P</em> = .09). In GG, 93% of the individuals presented restricted diaphragmatic mobility, with a mean mobility of 3.1 ± 1.9 cm, and in the CG, 36.8% with a mean of 6.9 + 1.7 cm (<em>P</em><span> < .001). The GG presented a higher occurrence of restricted rotation and lateral glide mobility of the cervical vertebrae, pain to palpation, and density and texture dysfunction of the adjacent tissues when compared with CG (</span><em>P</em><span> < .05). In the thoracic region, there was no difference between GG and CG regarding musculoskeletal signs and symptoms.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Individuals with chronic gastritis presented greater abdominal restriction and lower diaphragmatic mobility, in addition to a higher occurrence of musculoskeletal dysfunction in the cervical spine when compared with healthy individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947977/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to assess abdominal and diaphragmatic mobility in adults with chronic gastritis compared with healthy individuals and to analyze the impact of chronic gastritis on musculoskeletal signs and symptoms of the cervical and thoracic spine.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study conducted by the physiotherapy department at the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco in Brazil. Fifty-seven individuals participated, 28 with chronic gastritis (gastritis group [GG]) and 29 healthy individuals (control group [CG]). We assessed the following: restricted abdominal mobility in the transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes; diaphragmatic mobility; restricted cervical vertebral segmental mobility; restricted thoracic vertebral segmental mobility; and pain on palpation, asymmetry, and density and texture of the soft tissues on the cervical and thoracic spine. The measure of diaphragmatic mobility was assessed with ultrasound imaging. The Fisher exact and χ2 tests were applied to compare the groups (GG and CG) in relation to the restricted mobility of the abdominal tissues near the stomach on all planes and diaphragm, and the independent samples t test to compare the mobility measurements of the diaphragm. A significance level of 5% was considered for all tests.
Results
Restricted abdominal mobility in all directions (P < .05) was greater in GG when compared with CG except for the counterclockwise direction (P = .09). In GG, 93% of the individuals presented restricted diaphragmatic mobility, with a mean mobility of 3.1 ± 1.9 cm, and in the CG, 36.8% with a mean of 6.9 + 1.7 cm (P < .001). The GG presented a higher occurrence of restricted rotation and lateral glide mobility of the cervical vertebrae, pain to palpation, and density and texture dysfunction of the adjacent tissues when compared with CG (P < .05). In the thoracic region, there was no difference between GG and CG regarding musculoskeletal signs and symptoms.
Conclusion
Individuals with chronic gastritis presented greater abdominal restriction and lower diaphragmatic mobility, in addition to a higher occurrence of musculoskeletal dysfunction in the cervical spine when compared with healthy individuals.