Ergonomic Risk Factors of Fourth- and Fifth-Year International Medical University Dental Students

Ni Ting Chong BS(Hons)Chiro, Valerie Ying Chin BS(Hons)Chiro, Michael Thomas Haneline MPH, Yi Kai Wong BS(Hons)Chiro, MSPH
{"title":"Ergonomic Risk Factors of Fourth- and Fifth-Year International Medical University Dental Students","authors":"Ni Ting Chong BS(Hons)Chiro,&nbsp;Valerie Ying Chin BS(Hons)Chiro,&nbsp;Michael Thomas Haneline MPH,&nbsp;Yi Kai Wong BS(Hons)Chiro, MSPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2022.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to identify and compare the ergonomic risk factors of year 4 and year 5 dental students attending International Medical University.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was an exploratory, observational study evaluating ergonomic risk factors among year 4 and year 5 dental students, with a total of 89 participants. The students’ ergonomic risk components were evaluated using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) worksheet. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the RULA scores, and the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test served to determine the difference of ergonomic risk between year 4 and year 5 dental students.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The descriptive analysis showed that the participants’ (N = 89) median final RULA score was 6.00 (standard deviation = 0.716). One-year difference in the years of clinical practice did not produce a significant difference in the final RULA score (<em>U</em> = 913.0, <em>P</em> = 0.49). The final RULA scores showed year 4 dental students had a higher mean ranking (year 4 = 46.65, year 5 = 43.23). Furthermore, the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test indicated that this was not statistically significant (<em>U</em> = 913.0, <em>P</em> = 0.49).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The descriptive analysis showed that the final RULA score of the participants indicated that the participants were in a high-risk category for experiencing work-related musculoskeletal disorders<span> due to poor ergonomics. Contributing physical factors included working in asymmetric, awkward, and static positions in a confined workspace, infrequent use of dental loupes, and utilization of dental chairs that were not ergonomically appropriate.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9947964/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370722000803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to identify and compare the ergonomic risk factors of year 4 and year 5 dental students attending International Medical University.

Methods

This was an exploratory, observational study evaluating ergonomic risk factors among year 4 and year 5 dental students, with a total of 89 participants. The students’ ergonomic risk components were evaluated using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) worksheet. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the RULA scores, and the Mann-Whitney U test served to determine the difference of ergonomic risk between year 4 and year 5 dental students.

Results

The descriptive analysis showed that the participants’ (N = 89) median final RULA score was 6.00 (standard deviation = 0.716). One-year difference in the years of clinical practice did not produce a significant difference in the final RULA score (U = 913.0, P = 0.49). The final RULA scores showed year 4 dental students had a higher mean ranking (year 4 = 46.65, year 5 = 43.23). Furthermore, the Mann-Whitney U test indicated that this was not statistically significant (U = 913.0, P = 0.49).

Conclusion

The descriptive analysis showed that the final RULA score of the participants indicated that the participants were in a high-risk category for experiencing work-related musculoskeletal disorders due to poor ergonomics. Contributing physical factors included working in asymmetric, awkward, and static positions in a confined workspace, infrequent use of dental loupes, and utilization of dental chairs that were not ergonomically appropriate.

国际医科大学四、五年级牙科学生的人体工程学危险因素
目的探讨国际医科大学四年级和五年级牙科学生的人体工程学危险因素。方法本研究是一项探索性观察性研究,评估四年级和五年级牙科学生的人体工程学危险因素,共有89名参与者。使用快速上肢评估(RULA)工作表对学生的人体工程学风险成分进行评估。采用描述性统计分析RULA评分,采用Mann-Whitney U检验确定四年级和五年级牙科学生在人体工程学风险方面的差异。结果描述性分析显示,受试者(N = 89)的最终RULA评分中位数为6.00(标准差= 0.716)。临床年限一年的差异在最终RULA评分上没有显著差异(U = 913.0, P = 0.49)。最终的RULA分数显示,四年级牙科学生的平均排名更高(四年级= 46.65,五年级= 43.23)。此外,Mann-Whitney U检验显示这没有统计学意义(U = 913.0, P = 0.49)。结论描述性分析表明,最终受试者的RULA得分表明,由于较差的人体工程学,受试者处于与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的高风险类别。物理因素包括在有限的工作空间中以不对称、尴尬和静态的姿势工作,很少使用牙镜,以及使用不符合人体工程学的牙科椅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信