Intracranial vascular stenosis in giant cell arteritis successfully treated by two balloon angioplasty procedures.

Kensaku Takatsuki, Yuki Kojima, Yasuhito Ikeuchi, Jiro Kitayama, Atsushi Tanaka, Yasushi Inoue
{"title":"Intracranial vascular stenosis in giant cell arteritis successfully treated by two balloon angioplasty procedures.","authors":"Kensaku Takatsuki,&nbsp;Yuki Kojima,&nbsp;Yasuhito Ikeuchi,&nbsp;Jiro Kitayama,&nbsp;Atsushi Tanaka,&nbsp;Yasushi Inoue","doi":"10.1093/mrcr/rxac080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intracranial vascular stenosis is rarely associated with giant cell arteritis (GCA), and the prognosis for stroke caused by GCA is poor. Despite its unfavourable outcome, the strategy to manage this involvement and the indication of endovascular treatment are not well defined in the latest guidelines or recommendations. Here, we present a case in a 68-year-old woman, which was refractory to medical therapy, but successfully treated by two balloon angioplasty procedures. She was admitted to our department with lower extremity stiffness and left visual disturbance. GCA was clinically diagnosed by the wall thickening of the temporal artery and the aorta. Hemiparesis and motor aphasia developed shortly after intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed acute cerebral infarction with severe stenosis at the end of the left internal carotid artery. Balloon angioplasty was tried initially with improvement in her symptoms and additionally performed to treat restenosis without any significant adverse events. Her symptoms markedly improved with no recurrence until 8 months after discharge. We also review 10 similar cases reported in the literature. Although further evidence is needed to confirm the usefulness and safety of balloon angioplasty for intracranial GCA, this case report provides valuable information about the endovascular therapy for GCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":18677,"journal":{"name":"Modern Rheumatology Case Reports","volume":"7 1","pages":"166-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Rheumatology Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mrcr/rxac080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Intracranial vascular stenosis is rarely associated with giant cell arteritis (GCA), and the prognosis for stroke caused by GCA is poor. Despite its unfavourable outcome, the strategy to manage this involvement and the indication of endovascular treatment are not well defined in the latest guidelines or recommendations. Here, we present a case in a 68-year-old woman, which was refractory to medical therapy, but successfully treated by two balloon angioplasty procedures. She was admitted to our department with lower extremity stiffness and left visual disturbance. GCA was clinically diagnosed by the wall thickening of the temporal artery and the aorta. Hemiparesis and motor aphasia developed shortly after intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed acute cerebral infarction with severe stenosis at the end of the left internal carotid artery. Balloon angioplasty was tried initially with improvement in her symptoms and additionally performed to treat restenosis without any significant adverse events. Her symptoms markedly improved with no recurrence until 8 months after discharge. We also review 10 similar cases reported in the literature. Although further evidence is needed to confirm the usefulness and safety of balloon angioplasty for intracranial GCA, this case report provides valuable information about the endovascular therapy for GCA.

颅内血管狭窄的巨细胞动脉炎成功治疗两次球囊血管成形术。
颅内血管狭窄很少与巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)合并,而由GCA引起的脑卒中预后较差。尽管其不利的结果,管理这种累及的策略和血管内治疗的指征在最新的指南或建议中没有很好的定义。在这里,我们提出一个病例,在68岁的妇女,这是难治性药物治疗,但成功地治疗了两次球囊血管成形术。患者因下肢僵硬及左侧视力障碍入住我科。临床诊断为颞动脉和主动脉壁增厚。静脉注射甲基强的松龙脉冲治疗后不久出现偏瘫和运动失语,磁共振成像显示急性脑梗死伴左侧颈内动脉末端严重狭窄。最初尝试球囊血管成形术,改善了她的症状,并进一步治疗再狭窄,没有任何明显的不良事件。患者症状明显改善,出院后8个月无复发。我们也回顾了文献中报道的10例类似病例。虽然需要进一步的证据来证实球囊血管成形术治疗颅内GCA的有效性和安全性,但本病例报告为血管内治疗GCA提供了有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信