The Clinical Impact of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in the Management of Thoracic Aortic Diseases.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-07 DOI:10.1177/15266028221148381
Fernando Molano, Carlos Eduardo Rey Chaves, Danny Conde, Felipe Girón, Ricardo E Núñez-Rocha, Daniela Ayala, Juliana González, Felipe Cortés, Diana Cortés, Ernesto Fajardo, Vladimir Barón
{"title":"The Clinical Impact of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in the Management of Thoracic Aortic Diseases.","authors":"Fernando Molano, Carlos Eduardo Rey Chaves, Danny Conde, Felipe Girón, Ricardo E Núñez-Rocha, Daniela Ayala, Juliana González, Felipe Cortés, Diana Cortés, Ernesto Fajardo, Vladimir Barón","doi":"10.1177/15266028221148381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been described to be superior to an open surgical approach, and previous studies have found superiority in TEVAR by reducing overall morbidity and mortality rates. This study aimed to describe the outcomes of TEVAR for patients with thoracic aortic disease at a high complexity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Descriptive study, developed by a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Patients aged above 18 years who underwent TEVAR between 2012 and 2022 were included. Patient demographics, perioperative data, surgical outcomes, morbidity, and mortality were described. Statistical and multivariate analyses were made. Statistical significance was reached when p values were <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 66 patients were included. Male patients were 60.61% and the mean age was 69.24 years. Associated aortic diseases were aneurysms (68.18%), ulcer-related (4.55%), intramural-related hematoma (7.58%), trauma-related pathology (1.52%), and aortic dissection (30.30%). The mean hospital stay was 18.10 days, and intensive care unit was required for 98.48%. At 30 days, the mortality rate was 10.61% and the reintervention rate was 21.21%. Increased intraoperative blood loss (p=0.001) and male sex (p=0.04) showed statistical relationship with mortality. Underweight patients have 6.7 and 11.4 times more risk of complications and endoleak compared with higher body mass index values (p=0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.82-7.21) and (p=0.02, 95% CI=1.31-12.57), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic endovascular aortic repair seems to be a feasible option for patients with thoracic aortic pathologies, with adequate rates of mortality and morbidity. Underweight patients seem to have an increased risk of overall morbidity and increased risk for endoleak. Further prospective studies are needed to prove our results.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>Obesity and BMI are widely studied in the surgical literature. According to our study, there is a paradox regarding the outcomes of patients treated with TEVAR in terms of postoperative complications and mortality related to the body mass index. And shouldn't be considered as a high-risk feature in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality in this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11408976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028221148381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been described to be superior to an open surgical approach, and previous studies have found superiority in TEVAR by reducing overall morbidity and mortality rates. This study aimed to describe the outcomes of TEVAR for patients with thoracic aortic disease at a high complexity.

Materials and methods: Descriptive study, developed by a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Patients aged above 18 years who underwent TEVAR between 2012 and 2022 were included. Patient demographics, perioperative data, surgical outcomes, morbidity, and mortality were described. Statistical and multivariate analyses were made. Statistical significance was reached when p values were <0.05.

Results: A total of 66 patients were included. Male patients were 60.61% and the mean age was 69.24 years. Associated aortic diseases were aneurysms (68.18%), ulcer-related (4.55%), intramural-related hematoma (7.58%), trauma-related pathology (1.52%), and aortic dissection (30.30%). The mean hospital stay was 18.10 days, and intensive care unit was required for 98.48%. At 30 days, the mortality rate was 10.61% and the reintervention rate was 21.21%. Increased intraoperative blood loss (p=0.001) and male sex (p=0.04) showed statistical relationship with mortality. Underweight patients have 6.7 and 11.4 times more risk of complications and endoleak compared with higher body mass index values (p=0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.82-7.21) and (p=0.02, 95% CI=1.31-12.57), respectively.

Conclusion: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair seems to be a feasible option for patients with thoracic aortic pathologies, with adequate rates of mortality and morbidity. Underweight patients seem to have an increased risk of overall morbidity and increased risk for endoleak. Further prospective studies are needed to prove our results.

Clinical impact: Obesity and BMI are widely studied in the surgical literature. According to our study, there is a paradox regarding the outcomes of patients treated with TEVAR in terms of postoperative complications and mortality related to the body mass index. And shouldn't be considered as a high-risk feature in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality in this procedure.

胸腔内血管主动脉修复术在胸主动脉疾病治疗中的临床影响。
目的:胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)被认为优于开放性手术方法,之前的研究发现 TEVAR 具有降低总体发病率和死亡率的优势。本研究旨在描述TEVAR对胸主动脉疾病高复杂性患者的治疗效果:描述性研究,通过对前瞻性收集的数据库进行回顾性审查得出。纳入2012年至2022年期间接受TEVAR手术的18岁以上患者。研究描述了患者的人口统计学特征、围手术期数据、手术结果、发病率和死亡率。进行了统计和多变量分析。结果显示,P 值达到统计学意义:共纳入 66 名患者。男性患者占 60.61%,平均年龄为 69.24 岁。伴发的主动脉疾病包括动脉瘤(68.18%)、溃疡相关疾病(4.55%)、壁内血肿(7.58%)、创伤相关疾病(1.52%)和主动脉夹层(30.30%)。平均住院时间为 18.10 天,98.48% 的患者需要入住重症监护室。30 天后,死亡率为 10.61%,再次手术率为 21.21%。术中失血量增加(P=0.001)和男性性别(P=0.04)与死亡率有统计学关系。体重不足的患者发生并发症和内漏的风险分别是体重指数较高者的6.7倍和11.4倍(P=0.04,95% 置信区间[CI]=0.82-7.21)和(P=0.02,95% CI=1.31-12.57):胸腔内血管主动脉修复术似乎是胸腔主动脉病变患者的可行选择,死亡率和发病率都很低。体重过轻的患者总体发病率和内漏风险似乎会增加。我们需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证明我们的结果:临床影响:肥胖和体重指数在外科文献中被广泛研究。根据我们的研究,接受 TEVAR 治疗的患者在术后并发症和死亡率方面存在与体重指数相关的悖论。在这种手术中,肥胖不应该被视为术后发病率和死亡率的高危因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信