Midterm Results of AAA Ankle Arthroplasty.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Foot & Ankle International Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/10711007231186375
Franz Endstrasser, Richard A Lindtner, Anna Landegger, Moritz Wagner, Martin Eichinger, Hannes Schönthaler, Gerhard Kaufmann, Alexander Brunner
{"title":"Midterm Results of AAA Ankle Arthroplasty.","authors":"Franz Endstrasser,&nbsp;Richard A Lindtner,&nbsp;Anna Landegger,&nbsp;Moritz Wagner,&nbsp;Martin Eichinger,&nbsp;Hannes Schönthaler,&nbsp;Gerhard Kaufmann,&nbsp;Alexander Brunner","doi":"10.1177/10711007231186375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcome reports for Alpha Ankle Arthroplasty (AAA), a third-generation implant relying on a mobile bearing design for total ankle replacement, are sparse. This retrospective study evaluated the midterm survivorship, clinical, and radiologic outcomes after implantation of this implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For 64 patients who received 65 Triple A ankle implants between 2009 and 2020, implant survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier curve. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by measuring the range of motion, stability, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Questionnaire score (WOMAC), and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS). The average pain level and satisfaction with the postoperative result were rated on a numeric rating scale (0-10). Additionally, radiologic analysis was performed using anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and tibiotalar alignment was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The implant-survival rate was 61.5% at a mean follow-up of 8.2 years. Twenty-five patients (38.5%) required revision surgery (average time to revision, 3.1 years, 95% CI 2.1-4.1 years). For patients without revisions, the average range of motion in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion were 3.6 ± 4.2 degrees and 21.9 ± 7.8 degrees, respectively. The mean WOMAC and AOFAS scores were 44.7 ± 47.5 and 75.1 ± 14.0, respectively. The average pain and subjective satisfaction scores were 2.0 ± 1.7 and 8.5 ± 1.9, respectively. Mean alignment values did not differ significantly for patients who required revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a high revision rate with use of the AAA. However, patients who did not require revision surgery had, on average, high satisfaction and good functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":12446,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle International","volume":" ","pages":"983-991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007231186375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Outcome reports for Alpha Ankle Arthroplasty (AAA), a third-generation implant relying on a mobile bearing design for total ankle replacement, are sparse. This retrospective study evaluated the midterm survivorship, clinical, and radiologic outcomes after implantation of this implant.

Methods: For 64 patients who received 65 Triple A ankle implants between 2009 and 2020, implant survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier curve. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by measuring the range of motion, stability, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Questionnaire score (WOMAC), and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS). The average pain level and satisfaction with the postoperative result were rated on a numeric rating scale (0-10). Additionally, radiologic analysis was performed using anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and tibiotalar alignment was assessed.

Results: The implant-survival rate was 61.5% at a mean follow-up of 8.2 years. Twenty-five patients (38.5%) required revision surgery (average time to revision, 3.1 years, 95% CI 2.1-4.1 years). For patients without revisions, the average range of motion in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion were 3.6 ± 4.2 degrees and 21.9 ± 7.8 degrees, respectively. The mean WOMAC and AOFAS scores were 44.7 ± 47.5 and 75.1 ± 14.0, respectively. The average pain and subjective satisfaction scores were 2.0 ± 1.7 and 8.5 ± 1.9, respectively. Mean alignment values did not differ significantly for patients who required revision surgery.

Conclusion: We found a high revision rate with use of the AAA. However, patients who did not require revision surgery had, on average, high satisfaction and good functional outcomes.

Level of evidence: Level IV, case series.

AAA踝关节置换术的中期疗效。
背景:Alpha踝关节置换术(AAA)是一种依靠移动轴承设计进行全踝关节置换的第三代植入物,其结果报告很少。这项回顾性研究评估了植入该植入物后的中期生存率、临床和放射学结果。方法:在2009年至2020年间,64名患者接受了65次Triple A踝关节植入术,使用Kaplan-Meier曲线计算植入物的存活率。通过测量运动范围、稳定性、西安大略大学和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎问卷评分(WOMAC)以及美国足踝学会踝后足评分(AOFAS)来评估临床结果。平均疼痛程度和对术后结果的满意度采用数字评分表(0-10)进行评分。此外,还使用前后侧位X线片进行了放射学分析,并评估了胫距对齐情况。结果:植入物存活率为61.5%,平均随访8.2次 年。25名患者(38.5%)需要翻修手术(翻修平均时间,3.1 年,95%置信区间2.1-4.1 年)。对于未进行翻修的患者,背屈和跖屈的平均运动范围为3.6 ± 4.2度和21.9度 ± 分别为7.8度。WOMAC和AOFAS的平均得分为44.7 ± 47.5和75.1 ± 14.0。平均疼痛和主观满意度得分为2.0 ± 1.7和8.5 ± 1.9。需要翻修手术的患者的平均对齐值没有显著差异。结论:我们发现使用AAA有较高的翻修率。然而,不需要翻修手术的患者平均满意度高,功能结果良好。证据级别:四级,案件系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle International
Foot & Ankle International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Foot & Ankle International (FAI), in publication since 1980, is the official journal of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS). This monthly medical journal emphasizes surgical and medical management as it relates to the foot and ankle with a specific focus on reconstructive, trauma, and sports-related conditions utilizing the latest technological advances. FAI offers original, clinically oriented, peer-reviewed research articles presenting new approaches to foot and ankle pathology and treatment, current case reviews, and technique tips addressing the management of complex problems. This journal is an ideal resource for highly-trained orthopaedic foot and ankle specialists and allied health care providers. The journal’s Founding Editor, Melvin H. Jahss, MD (deceased), served from 1980-1988. He was followed by Kenneth A. Johnson, MD (deceased) from 1988-1993; Lowell D. Lutter, MD (deceased) from 1993-2004; and E. Greer Richardson, MD from 2005-2007. David B. Thordarson, MD, assumed the role of Editor-in-Chief in 2008. The journal focuses on the following areas of interest: • Surgery • Wound care • Bone healing • Pain management • In-office orthotic systems • Diabetes • Sports medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信