Effectiveness of hyaluronic acid in the management of oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Manjushri Waingade, Raghavendra S Medikeri, Shamali Gaikwad
{"title":"Effectiveness of hyaluronic acid in the management of oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Manjushri Waingade, Raghavendra S Medikeri, Shamali Gaikwad","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.6.405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated condition that has been identified as a potentially malignant oral disorder. Various therapies have been proposed for its management as alternative to corticosteroids. However, no definitive treatment has been identified that can result in complete remission or minimal recurrence. Hyaluronic acid has recently been used as an alternative therapy for the management of OLP. This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of Hyaluronic acid in the management of symptomatic OLP. Online electronic databases and manual searches were performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English between January 2010 and April 2022. RCTs were identified that compared the efficacy of hyaluronic acid and other interventional therapies at baseline and during follow-up. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Thongprasom sign scores, lesion size, degree of erythema, clinical severity, and disease severity were assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Seven studies were analyzed. Five studies reported a high risk of bias while the remaining two studies reported an unclear risk of bias. The overall quantitative assessment of size, symptoms, degree of erythema, and sign score in OLP lesions treated with HA was not statistically significant compared to that in the control group (P > 0.05). In addition, subgroup analysis comparing HA with placebo or corticosteroids did not yield statistically significant (P > 0.05) results. Qualitatively, both HA and tacrolimus resulted in an effective reduction in signs and symptoms. Clinical/disease severity index/scores were inconsistent. A high degree of heterogeneity was observed among the included studies. None of the included studies reported the side effects of HA. These findings suggest that corticosteroids, tacrolimus, placebo, and HA could be equally effective in OLP management. The clinical/disease severity index or score reduction cannot be determined with certainty. Thus, OLP can be treated with HA as an alternative therapy. Owing to limited clinical trials on HA, high heterogeneity, and high risk of bias in the included studies, definitive conclusions cannot be derived.</p>","PeriodicalId":15634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":"22 6","pages":"405-417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/52/jdapm-22-405.PMC9763825.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.6.405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated condition that has been identified as a potentially malignant oral disorder. Various therapies have been proposed for its management as alternative to corticosteroids. However, no definitive treatment has been identified that can result in complete remission or minimal recurrence. Hyaluronic acid has recently been used as an alternative therapy for the management of OLP. This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of Hyaluronic acid in the management of symptomatic OLP. Online electronic databases and manual searches were performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English between January 2010 and April 2022. RCTs were identified that compared the efficacy of hyaluronic acid and other interventional therapies at baseline and during follow-up. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Thongprasom sign scores, lesion size, degree of erythema, clinical severity, and disease severity were assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Seven studies were analyzed. Five studies reported a high risk of bias while the remaining two studies reported an unclear risk of bias. The overall quantitative assessment of size, symptoms, degree of erythema, and sign score in OLP lesions treated with HA was not statistically significant compared to that in the control group (P > 0.05). In addition, subgroup analysis comparing HA with placebo or corticosteroids did not yield statistically significant (P > 0.05) results. Qualitatively, both HA and tacrolimus resulted in an effective reduction in signs and symptoms. Clinical/disease severity index/scores were inconsistent. A high degree of heterogeneity was observed among the included studies. None of the included studies reported the side effects of HA. These findings suggest that corticosteroids, tacrolimus, placebo, and HA could be equally effective in OLP management. The clinical/disease severity index or score reduction cannot be determined with certainty. Thus, OLP can be treated with HA as an alternative therapy. Owing to limited clinical trials on HA, high heterogeneity, and high risk of bias in the included studies, definitive conclusions cannot be derived.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

透明质酸治疗口腔扁平苔藓的效果:系统综述和荟萃分析。
口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)是一种由免疫介导的慢性炎症,已被确定为一种潜在的恶性口腔疾病。人们提出了各种治疗方法,以替代皮质类固醇激素。然而,目前还没有找到一种能使病情完全缓解或复发率降至最低的确切疗法。最近,透明质酸被用作治疗 OLP 的替代疗法。本研究旨在系统回顾透明质酸在治疗有症状的OLP方面的有效性。研究人员通过在线电子数据库和人工检索,查找了2010年1月至2022年4月期间用英语发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。结果发现,这些研究比较了透明质酸和其他介入疗法在基线和随访期间的疗效。科克伦偏倚风险工具用于评估纳入研究的质量。对视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Thongprasom体征评分、皮损大小、红斑程度、临床严重程度和疾病严重程度进行了定量和定性评估。共分析了七项研究。其中五项研究的偏倚风险较高,其余两项研究的偏倚风险不明确。与对照组相比,用HA治疗的OLP病变的大小、症状、红斑程度和体征评分的总体定量评估没有统计学意义(P > 0.05)。此外,HA与安慰剂或皮质类固醇的亚组分析结果也没有统计学意义(P > 0.05)。从质量上看,HA 和他克莫司都能有效减轻体征和症状。临床/疾病严重程度指数/评分不一致。所纳入的研究之间存在高度异质性。所纳入的研究均未报告 HA 的副作用。这些研究结果表明,皮质类固醇、他克莫司、安慰剂和HA对治疗OLP同样有效。临床/疾病严重程度指数或评分的降低无法确定。因此,HA 可作为治疗 OLP 的替代疗法。由于有关HA的临床试验有限、异质性高以及所纳入研究的偏倚风险高,因此无法得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信