Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on demand for emergency department care for older patients: the EDEN-7 COVID cohort study.

F Javier Montero-Pérez, Ángela María Cobos Requena, Juan González Del Castillo, Javier Jacob, Eric Jorge García-Lamberechts, Pascual Piñera Salmerón, Aitor Alquézar-Arbé, Sira Aguiló, Cesáreo Fernández Alonso, Guillermo Burillo-Putze, María Calderón Caro, Ángel Iván Díaz Salado, Enrique Martín Mojarro, Patricia Eiroa-Hernández, Patricia Parra-Esquivel, Juan José López Pérez, Martín Ruiz Grinspan, Ivet Gina Osorio Quispe, Matilde González Tejera, Leticia Serrano Lázaro, Begoña Espinosa Fernández, Lidia Fuentes, Coral Suero Méndez, María Del Valle Toro-Gallardo, Fahd Beddar Chaib, Paula Pedraza Ramírez, Òscar Miró
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on demand for emergency department care for older patients: the EDEN-7 COVID cohort study.","authors":"F Javier Montero-Pérez, Ángela María Cobos Requena, Juan González Del Castillo, Javier Jacob, Eric Jorge García-Lamberechts, Pascual Piñera Salmerón, Aitor Alquézar-Arbé, Sira Aguiló, Cesáreo Fernández Alonso, Guillermo Burillo-Putze, María Calderón Caro, Ángel Iván Díaz Salado, Enrique Martín Mojarro, Patricia Eiroa-Hernández, Patricia Parra-Esquivel, Juan José López Pérez, Martín Ruiz Grinspan, Ivet Gina Osorio Quispe, Matilde González Tejera, Leticia Serrano Lázaro, Begoña Espinosa Fernández, Lidia Fuentes, Coral Suero Méndez, María Del Valle Toro-Gallardo, Fahd Beddar Chaib, Paula Pedraza Ramírez, Òscar Miró","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Spanish emergency department (ED) care for patients aged 65 years or older during the first wave vs. a pre-pandemic period.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study of a COVID-19 portion of the EDEN project (Emergency Department and Elder Needs). The EDEN-COVID cohort included all patients aged 65 years or more who were treated in 52 EDs on 7 consecutive days early in the pandemic. We analyzed care variables, discharge diagnoses, use of diagnostic and therapeutic resources, use of observation units, need for hospitalization, rehospitalization, and mortality. These data were compared with data for an EDEN cohort in the same age group recruited during a similar period the year before the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 52 participating hospital EDs attended 33 711 emergencies during the pandemic vs. 96 173 emergencies in the pre-COVID period, representing a 61.7% reduction during the pandemic. Patients aged 65 years or older accounted for 28.8% of the caseload during the COVID-19 period and 26.4% of the earlier cohort (P .001). The COVID-19 caseload included more men (51.0%). Comorbidity and polypharmacy were more prevalent in the pandemic cohort than in the earlier one (comorbidity, 92.6% vs. 91.6%; polypharmacy, 65.2% vs. 63.6%). More esturesources (analgesics, antibiotics, heparins, bronchodilators, and corticosteroids) were applied in the pandemic period, and common diagnoses were made less often. Observation wards were used more often (for 37.8% vs. 26.2% in the earlier period), and hospital admissions were more frequent (in 56.0% vs. 25.3% before the pandemic). Mortality was higher during the pandemic than in the earlier cohort either in ED (1.8% vs 0.5%) and during hospitalization (11.5 vs 2.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of patients aged 65 years or older decreased in the participating Spanish EDs. However, more resources were required and the pattern of diagnoses changed. Observation ward stays were longer, and admissions and mortality increased over the numbers seen in the reference period.</p>","PeriodicalId":11644,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"35 4","pages":"270-278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Spanish emergency department (ED) care for patients aged 65 years or older during the first wave vs. a pre-pandemic period.

Material and methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study of a COVID-19 portion of the EDEN project (Emergency Department and Elder Needs). The EDEN-COVID cohort included all patients aged 65 years or more who were treated in 52 EDs on 7 consecutive days early in the pandemic. We analyzed care variables, discharge diagnoses, use of diagnostic and therapeutic resources, use of observation units, need for hospitalization, rehospitalization, and mortality. These data were compared with data for an EDEN cohort in the same age group recruited during a similar period the year before the pandemic.

Results: The 52 participating hospital EDs attended 33 711 emergencies during the pandemic vs. 96 173 emergencies in the pre-COVID period, representing a 61.7% reduction during the pandemic. Patients aged 65 years or older accounted for 28.8% of the caseload during the COVID-19 period and 26.4% of the earlier cohort (P .001). The COVID-19 caseload included more men (51.0%). Comorbidity and polypharmacy were more prevalent in the pandemic cohort than in the earlier one (comorbidity, 92.6% vs. 91.6%; polypharmacy, 65.2% vs. 63.6%). More esturesources (analgesics, antibiotics, heparins, bronchodilators, and corticosteroids) were applied in the pandemic period, and common diagnoses were made less often. Observation wards were used more often (for 37.8% vs. 26.2% in the earlier period), and hospital admissions were more frequent (in 56.0% vs. 25.3% before the pandemic). Mortality was higher during the pandemic than in the earlier cohort either in ED (1.8% vs 0.5%) and during hospitalization (11.5 vs 2.9%).

Conclusion: The proportion of patients aged 65 years or older decreased in the participating Spanish EDs. However, more resources were required and the pattern of diagnoses changed. Observation ward stays were longer, and admissions and mortality increased over the numbers seen in the reference period.

COVID-19 大流行对老年患者急诊需求的影响:EDEN-7 COVID 队列研究。
目的分析 COVID-19 大流行对西班牙急诊科(ED)在第一波与大流行前对 65 岁或以上患者护理的影响:对 EDEN 项目(急诊科和老年人需求)的 COVID-19 部分进行回顾性横断面研究。EDEN-COVID 队列包括大流行初期连续 7 天在 52 家急诊室接受治疗的所有 65 岁或以上患者。我们分析了护理变量、出院诊断、诊断和治疗资源的使用、观察室的使用、住院需求、再次住院和死亡率。我们将这些数据与大流行前一年类似时期招募的同年龄组 EDEN 队列的数据进行了比较:结果:52 家参与医院的急诊室在大流行期间共处理了 33 711 起急诊,而在 COVID 之前则处理了 96 173 起急诊,大流行期间急诊量减少了 61.7%。在 COVID-19 期间,65 岁或 65 岁以上的患者占病例数的 28.8%,而在之前的病例数中,65 岁或 65 岁以上的患者占 26.4%(P .001)。COVID-19 的病例中男性患者较多(51.0%)。合并症和多重用药在大流行病组群中的发病率高于早期组群(合并症,92.6% 对 91.6%;多重用药,65.2% 对 63.6%)。大流行期间使用了更多的药物(镇痛剂、抗生素、肝素、支气管扩张剂和皮质类固醇),而普通诊断则较少。观察病房的使用频率更高(37.8% 对比起大流行前的 26.2%),入院治疗的频率更高(56.0% 对比起大流行前的 25.3%)。在大流行期间,无论是在急诊室(1.8% 对 0.5%)还是在住院期间(11.5% 对 2.9%),死亡率都高于早期队列:结论:在参与研究的西班牙急诊室中,65 岁或以上患者的比例有所下降。结论:在参与研究的西班牙急诊室中,65 岁及以上患者的比例有所下降,但需要更多的资源,诊断模式也发生了变化。与参照期相比,观察病房的住院时间延长了,入院人数和死亡率增加了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信