Change of pulmonary function tests in hospitalized COVID-19 patients at third and sixth month follow-up.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Meltem Karakulak Kafkas, Sabah Tüzün, Nazlı Hacıağaoğlu, Hüseyin Çetin, Sevda Şener Cömert, Engin Ersin Şimşek
{"title":"Change of pulmonary function tests in hospitalized COVID-19 patients at third and sixth month follow-up.","authors":"Meltem Karakulak Kafkas, Sabah Tüzün, Nazlı Hacıağaoğlu, Hüseyin Çetin, Sevda Şener Cömert, Engin Ersin Şimşek","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmac145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of COVID-19 infection on pulmonary function is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate pulmonary function tests (PFTs) of patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia at 3 and 6 months post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 18 years and over who had positive COVID-19 PCR test results and were hospitalized in the pandemic service between 1 May 2020 and 31 October 2020, were included in the study. All patients were evaluated with PFTs FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25-75 at 3 and 6 months after discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of 34 patients included in the study was 47.7 ± 12.7 years. The FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25-75 measurements at 3 and 6 months post-discharge showed no significant difference (P = 0.765, P = 0.907, P = 0.707, and P = 0.674, respectively). There was no significant difference in any PFT measurements at the third month follow-up, regardless of the pharmacological treatment protocols applied during hospitalization (P > 0.05). However, FEV1/FVC and FEF25-75 levels were 83.1 [3.4]% and 91.0 [10.0]%, respectively, in those who received systemic steroid treatment, and 78.3 ± 8.5% and 72.5 ± 25.7% in those who did not (P = 0.019 and P = 0.048, respectively). In addition, FVC and FEV1 levels increased significantly from the third to the sixth month follow-up in patients who received systemic steroid therapy (P = 0.035 and P = 0.018, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there is no significant difference in PFT measurements from 3 to 6 months in COVID-19 patients, systemic steroid therapy may have a beneficial effect on respiratory function in COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effect of COVID-19 infection on pulmonary function is unknown.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate pulmonary function tests (PFTs) of patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia at 3 and 6 months post-discharge.

Methods: Patients aged 18 years and over who had positive COVID-19 PCR test results and were hospitalized in the pandemic service between 1 May 2020 and 31 October 2020, were included in the study. All patients were evaluated with PFTs FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25-75 at 3 and 6 months after discharge.

Results: The mean age of 34 patients included in the study was 47.7 ± 12.7 years. The FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25-75 measurements at 3 and 6 months post-discharge showed no significant difference (P = 0.765, P = 0.907, P = 0.707, and P = 0.674, respectively). There was no significant difference in any PFT measurements at the third month follow-up, regardless of the pharmacological treatment protocols applied during hospitalization (P > 0.05). However, FEV1/FVC and FEF25-75 levels were 83.1 [3.4]% and 91.0 [10.0]%, respectively, in those who received systemic steroid treatment, and 78.3 ± 8.5% and 72.5 ± 25.7% in those who did not (P = 0.019 and P = 0.048, respectively). In addition, FVC and FEV1 levels increased significantly from the third to the sixth month follow-up in patients who received systemic steroid therapy (P = 0.035 and P = 0.018, respectively).

Conclusion: Although there is no significant difference in PFT measurements from 3 to 6 months in COVID-19 patients, systemic steroid therapy may have a beneficial effect on respiratory function in COVID-19 patients.

COVID-19 住院患者在第三个月和第六个月随访时肺功能测试的变化。
背景:COVID-19感染对肺功能的影响尚不清楚:COVID-19感染对肺功能的影响尚不清楚:本研究旨在评估确诊为COVID-19肺炎的住院患者在出院后3个月和6个月时的肺功能测试(PFT):研究纳入了在 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 31 日期间在大流行病服务机构住院且 COVID-19 PCR 检测结果呈阳性的 18 岁及以上患者。所有患者均在出院后3个月和6个月接受了PFT FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC和FEF25-75评估:34名患者的平均年龄为(47.7 ± 12.7)岁。出院后 3 个月和 6 个月的 FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC 和 FEF25-75 测量结果无显著差异(分别为 P = 0.765、P = 0.907、P = 0.707 和 P = 0.674)。在第三个月的随访中,无论住院期间采用何种药物治疗方案,PFT 测量结果均无明显差异(P > 0.05)。然而,接受全身类固醇治疗的患者的 FEV1/FVC 和 FEF25-75 分别为 83.1 [3.4]% 和 91.0 [10.0]%,而未接受全身类固醇治疗的患者分别为 78.3 ± 8.5% 和 72.5 ± 25.7%(P = 0.019 和 P = 0.048)。此外,接受全身类固醇治疗的患者的 FVC 和 FEV1 水平在随访的第三个月至第六个月期间显著增加(分别为 P = 0.035 和 P = 0.018):结论:虽然 COVID-19 患者 3 至 6 个月的 PFT 测量结果无明显差异,但全身性类固醇治疗可能对 COVID-19 患者的呼吸功能有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信