Endoscopic Skills Training: The Impact of Virtual Exercises on Simulated Colonoscopy.

IF 1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Rita Morato, Luís Tomé, Mário Dinis-Ribeiro, Carla Rolanda
{"title":"Endoscopic Skills Training: The Impact of Virtual Exercises on Simulated Colonoscopy.","authors":"Rita Morato,&nbsp;Luís Tomé,&nbsp;Mário Dinis-Ribeiro,&nbsp;Carla Rolanda","doi":"10.1159/000520237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A previous study suggested that psychomotor training improves the performance on colonoscopy. Since then, newer exercises have been included in the latest generation of GI Mentor®. In order to optimize a colonoscopy training program, we aimed to determine the impact of 3 virtual exercises in simulated colonoscopy skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective and randomized study. Nineteen residents completed a pre-training questionnaire and a colonoscopy trial before randomization in a study group (<i>n</i> = 10) that performed three exercises (Endobubble I, Navigation I, and Mucosal Evaluation I) until they achieved expert level, and a control group (<i>n</i> = 9). Both groups performed 10 repetitions of a simulated colonoscopy and were assessed on a final case. Learning curves and skills transfer were assessed by four parameters: mucosal surface examined (%), time to reach the cecum (s), screening efficiency (%), and time the patient was in pain (%). We also evaluated the construct validity for the exercises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Construct validity was confirmed for Endobubble I and verified in Navigation I (experts were faster than novices; 5 vs. 7 s, <i>p</i> = 0.040), but not for Mucosal Evaluation I. Analyzing the learning curves and performance in the 10 repetitions<b>,</b> the study group reached the cecum faster (278 vs. 356 s, <i>p</i> = 0.035) and achieved a higher screening efficiency (83% vs. 75%, <i>p</i> = 0.019). Concerning skills transfer, the control group took longer to reach the cecum (241 vs. 292 s, <i>p</i> = 0.021) and the percentage of time the patient was in pain was higher (6% vs. 9%, <i>p</i> = 0.021). General performances of the study group had smaller interquartile variations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Psychomotor training has a significant impact on the homogeneous acquisition and assimilation of colonoscopy skills. Endobubble I and Navigation I should be considered in the training programs for novices.</p>","PeriodicalId":51838,"journal":{"name":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"29 6","pages":"374-384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/39/pjg-0029-0374.PMC9761354.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000520237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A previous study suggested that psychomotor training improves the performance on colonoscopy. Since then, newer exercises have been included in the latest generation of GI Mentor®. In order to optimize a colonoscopy training program, we aimed to determine the impact of 3 virtual exercises in simulated colonoscopy skills.

Methods: This was a prospective and randomized study. Nineteen residents completed a pre-training questionnaire and a colonoscopy trial before randomization in a study group (n = 10) that performed three exercises (Endobubble I, Navigation I, and Mucosal Evaluation I) until they achieved expert level, and a control group (n = 9). Both groups performed 10 repetitions of a simulated colonoscopy and were assessed on a final case. Learning curves and skills transfer were assessed by four parameters: mucosal surface examined (%), time to reach the cecum (s), screening efficiency (%), and time the patient was in pain (%). We also evaluated the construct validity for the exercises.

Results: Construct validity was confirmed for Endobubble I and verified in Navigation I (experts were faster than novices; 5 vs. 7 s, p = 0.040), but not for Mucosal Evaluation I. Analyzing the learning curves and performance in the 10 repetitions, the study group reached the cecum faster (278 vs. 356 s, p = 0.035) and achieved a higher screening efficiency (83% vs. 75%, p = 0.019). Concerning skills transfer, the control group took longer to reach the cecum (241 vs. 292 s, p = 0.021) and the percentage of time the patient was in pain was higher (6% vs. 9%, p = 0.021). General performances of the study group had smaller interquartile variations.

Conclusion: Psychomotor training has a significant impact on the homogeneous acquisition and assimilation of colonoscopy skills. Endobubble I and Navigation I should be considered in the training programs for novices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

内镜技能训练:虚拟练习对模拟结肠镜检查的影响。
背景:先前的一项研究表明,精神运动训练可以提高结肠镜检查的表现。从那时起,更新的练习已包括在最新一代的GI导师®。为了优化结肠镜检查培训计划,我们旨在确定3个虚拟练习对模拟结肠镜检查技能的影响。方法:前瞻性随机研究。19名住院医生在随机分组前完成了训练前问卷调查和结肠镜检查试验,其中研究组(n = 10)进行了三种练习(Endobubble I, Navigation I和Mucosal Evaluation I),直到他们达到专家水平,对照组(n = 9)。两组重复进行了10次模拟结肠镜检查,并对最终病例进行了评估。学习曲线和技能转移通过四个参数进行评估:检查粘膜表面(%)、到达盲肠的时间(s)、筛查效率(%)和患者疼痛时间(%)。我们也评估了练习的构念效度。结果:Endobubble I的结构效度得到了证实,Navigation I的结构效度得到了验证(专家比新手更快;分析10次重复的学习曲线和表现,研究组到达盲肠的时间更快(278秒对356秒,p = 0.035),筛查效率更高(83%对75%,p = 0.019)。在技能转移方面,对照组到达盲肠所需时间更长(241秒比292秒,p = 0.021),患者疼痛时间百分比更高(6%比9%,p = 0.021)。研究组的总体表现有较小的四分位数差异。结论:精神运动训练对结肠镜技能的同质性习得和同化有显著影响。Endobubble I和Navigation I应该被考虑在新手培训计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology'' (formerly Jornal Português de Gastrenterologia), founded in 1994, is the official publication of Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia (Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology), Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (Portuguese Society of Digestive Endoscopy) and Associação Portuguesa para o Estudo do Fígado (Portuguese Association for the Study of the Liver). The journal publishes clinical and basic research articles on Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, Hepatology and related topics. Review articles, clinical case studies, images, letters to the editor and other articles such as recommendations or papers on gastroenterology clinical practice are also considered. Only articles written in English are accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信