Addressing Health Inequities: An Exploratory Assessment of Extension Educators' Perceptions of Program Demand for Diverse Communities.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Lauren E Kennedy, Thomas E Strayer, Laura E Balis
{"title":"Addressing Health Inequities: An Exploratory Assessment of Extension Educators' Perceptions of Program Demand for Diverse Communities.","authors":"Lauren E Kennedy,&nbsp;Thomas E Strayer,&nbsp;Laura E Balis","doi":"10.1097/FCH.0000000000000332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Land grant universities are a key provider of community-based health promotion programs through the Cooperative Extension Service. However, Extension's current approach to addressing systemic social determinants of health is incomplete and inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to explore Extension health educators' perceptions of demand for health promotion programming targeting audiences most likely to experience health inequities. Health educators within 2 state Extension systems were invited to complete an online survey based on a capacity building model. Survey questions included rating perceptions of demand for programming for health disparate populations: low-income; Black and African American; Hispanic, Latino/a, Latinx; persons with disabilities; immigrants and refugees; and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender. Analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc testing was used to determine differences in perceived demand between populations. Ninety-six educators completed the survey. Perceived demand for low-income population programming was significantly higher than for other populations. Perceived programming demand for immigrants and refugees and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people was significantly lower than for other populations. Individual and organizational-level factors, including racism and Extension's historical scope, likely contribute to the results. Engaging historically excluded Extension audiences requires time and resources to improve the Extension system and educator capacity for relationship building, trust building, and communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":47183,"journal":{"name":"Family & Community Health","volume":"45 4","pages":"228-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000332","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Land grant universities are a key provider of community-based health promotion programs through the Cooperative Extension Service. However, Extension's current approach to addressing systemic social determinants of health is incomplete and inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to explore Extension health educators' perceptions of demand for health promotion programming targeting audiences most likely to experience health inequities. Health educators within 2 state Extension systems were invited to complete an online survey based on a capacity building model. Survey questions included rating perceptions of demand for programming for health disparate populations: low-income; Black and African American; Hispanic, Latino/a, Latinx; persons with disabilities; immigrants and refugees; and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender. Analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc testing was used to determine differences in perceived demand between populations. Ninety-six educators completed the survey. Perceived demand for low-income population programming was significantly higher than for other populations. Perceived programming demand for immigrants and refugees and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people was significantly lower than for other populations. Individual and organizational-level factors, including racism and Extension's historical scope, likely contribute to the results. Engaging historically excluded Extension audiences requires time and resources to improve the Extension system and educator capacity for relationship building, trust building, and communication.

解决卫生不公平:扩展教育工作者对不同社区项目需求的看法的探索性评估。
通过合作推广服务,赠地大学是社区健康促进计划的主要提供者。然而,推广处目前处理系统性健康社会决定因素的方法是不完整和不一致的。本研究的目的是探讨推广健康教育者对针对最有可能经历健康不平等的受众的健康促进规划需求的看法。邀请两个州推广系统内的卫生教育工作者根据能力建设模型完成一项在线调查。调查问题包括对不同人群健康规划需求的看法评级:低收入;黑人和非裔美国人;Hispanic, Latino/拉丁裔;残疾人;移民和难民;还有女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人。采用方差分析和Bonferroni事后检验来确定人群之间感知需求的差异。96名教育工作者完成了这项调查。对低收入人口方案的需求明显高于对其他人口的需求。对移民、难民、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人的编程需求明显低于其他人群。个人和组织层面的因素,包括种族主义和扩展的历史范围,可能对结果有影响。吸引历史上被排斥的扩展受众需要时间和资源来改进扩展系统和教育者建立关系、建立信任和沟通的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Family & Community Health is a practical quarterly which presents creative, multidisciplinary perspectives and approaches for effective public and community health programs. Each issue focuses on a single timely topic and addresses issues of concern to a wide variety of population groups with diverse ethnic backgrounds, including children and the elderly, men and women, and rural and urban communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信