Greenness exposure: beneficial but multidimensional.

IF 2.3 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Breathe Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1183/20734735.0221-2022
Ane Johannessen, Shanshan Xu, Achenyo Peace Abbah, Christer Janson
{"title":"Greenness exposure: beneficial but multidimensional.","authors":"Ane Johannessen,&nbsp;Shanshan Xu,&nbsp;Achenyo Peace Abbah,&nbsp;Christer Janson","doi":"10.1183/20734735.0221-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many studies have shown that greenness has beneficial health effects, particularly on psychological and cardiovascular outcomes. In this narrative review, we provide a synthesis of knowledge regarding greenness exposure and respiratory health. The following outcomes were reviewed: respiratory mortality, lung cancer mortality, lung cancer incidence, respiratory hospitalisations, lung function, COPD, and asthma. We identified 174 articles through a literature search in PubMed, of which 42 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The most common marker for greenness exposure was the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), which was used in 29 out of 42 papers. Other markers used were tree canopy cover, landcover/land-use, plant diversity, density of tall trees and subjectively perceived greenness. We found beneficial effects of greenness in most studies regarding respiratory mortality, lung cancer incidence, respiratory hospitalisations and lung function. For lung cancer mortality, asthma and COPD, the effects of greenness were less clear cut. While many aspects of greenness are beneficial, some aspects may be harmful, and greenness may have different health effects in different population subgroups. Future studies of greenness and respiratory diseases should focus on asthma and COPD, on effects in different population subgroups and on disentangling the health effects of the various greenness dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9292,"journal":{"name":"Breathe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7d/34/EDU-0221-2022.PMC10461730.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breathe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0221-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many studies have shown that greenness has beneficial health effects, particularly on psychological and cardiovascular outcomes. In this narrative review, we provide a synthesis of knowledge regarding greenness exposure and respiratory health. The following outcomes were reviewed: respiratory mortality, lung cancer mortality, lung cancer incidence, respiratory hospitalisations, lung function, COPD, and asthma. We identified 174 articles through a literature search in PubMed, of which 42 were eligible for inclusion in this review. The most common marker for greenness exposure was the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), which was used in 29 out of 42 papers. Other markers used were tree canopy cover, landcover/land-use, plant diversity, density of tall trees and subjectively perceived greenness. We found beneficial effects of greenness in most studies regarding respiratory mortality, lung cancer incidence, respiratory hospitalisations and lung function. For lung cancer mortality, asthma and COPD, the effects of greenness were less clear cut. While many aspects of greenness are beneficial, some aspects may be harmful, and greenness may have different health effects in different population subgroups. Future studies of greenness and respiratory diseases should focus on asthma and COPD, on effects in different population subgroups and on disentangling the health effects of the various greenness dimensions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

绿色暴露:有益但多维的。
许多研究表明,绿色对健康有益,尤其是对心理和心血管疾病的影响。在这叙述性审查,我们提供了一个关于绿色暴露和呼吸健康的知识的综合。回顾了以下结果:呼吸系统死亡率、肺癌死亡率、肺癌发病率、呼吸系统住院、肺功能、慢性阻塞性肺病和哮喘。我们通过PubMed的文献检索确定了174篇文章,其中42篇符合纳入本综述的条件。最常见的绿色暴露标记是归一化植被指数(NDVI), 42篇论文中有29篇使用了它。使用的其他标记包括树冠覆盖、土地覆盖/土地利用、植物多样性、高大树木密度和主观感知的绿化率。我们在大多数关于呼吸系统死亡率、肺癌发病率、呼吸系统住院率和肺功能的研究中发现了绿色的有益作用。对于肺癌死亡率、哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病,绿化的影响不那么明显。虽然绿色的许多方面是有益的,但有些方面可能是有害的,并且绿色可能对不同的人群亚群产生不同的健康影响。未来关于绿色度和呼吸系统疾病的研究应该关注哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病,不同人群亚群的影响,以及不同绿色度维度对健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breathe
Breathe RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信