A New Coronavirus Estimation Global Score for Predicting Mortality During Hospitalization in Patients with COVID-19.

Hesong Zeng, Xingwei He, Wanjun Liu, Jing Kan, Liqun He, Jinhe Zhao, Cynthia Chen, Junjie Zhang, Shaoliang Chen
{"title":"A New Coronavirus Estimation Global Score for Predicting Mortality During Hospitalization in Patients with COVID-19.","authors":"Hesong Zeng,&nbsp;Xingwei He,&nbsp;Wanjun Liu,&nbsp;Jing Kan,&nbsp;Liqun He,&nbsp;Jinhe Zhao,&nbsp;Cynthia Chen,&nbsp;Junjie Zhang,&nbsp;Shaoliang Chen","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) exists as a pandemic. Mortality during hospitalization is multifactorial, and there is urgent need for a risk stratification model to predict in-hospital death among COVID-19 patients. Here we aimed to construct a risk score system for early identification of COVID-19 patients at high probability of dying during in-hospital treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis, a total of 821 confirmed COVID-19 patients from 3 centers were assigned to developmental (<i>n</i> = 411, between January 14, 2020 and February 11, 2020) and validation (<i>n</i> = 410, between February 14, 2020 and March 13, 2020) groups. Based on demographic, symptomatic, and laboratory variables, a new Coronavirus estimation global (CORE-G) score for prediction of in-hospital death was established from the developmental group, and its performance was then evaluated in the validation group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CORE-G score consisted of 18 variables (5 demographics, 2 symptoms, and 11 laboratory measurements) with a sum of 69.5 points. Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that the model performed well in the developmental group (<i>H</i> = 3.210, <i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.880), and it was well validated in the validation group (<i>H</i> = 6.948, <i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.542). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.955 in the developmental group (sensitivity, 94.1%; specificity, 83.4%) and 0.937 in the validation group (sensitivity, 87.2%; specificity, 84.2%). The mortality rate was not significantly different between the developmental (<i>n</i> = 85,20.7%) and validation (<i>n</i> = 94, 22.9%, <i>P</i> <i>=</i> 0.608) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CORE-G score provides an estimate of the risk of in-hospital death. This is the first step toward the clinical use of the CORE-G score for predicting outcome in COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":"2 2","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/33/cd9-2-69.PMC9749948.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) exists as a pandemic. Mortality during hospitalization is multifactorial, and there is urgent need for a risk stratification model to predict in-hospital death among COVID-19 patients. Here we aimed to construct a risk score system for early identification of COVID-19 patients at high probability of dying during in-hospital treatment.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis, a total of 821 confirmed COVID-19 patients from 3 centers were assigned to developmental (n = 411, between January 14, 2020 and February 11, 2020) and validation (n = 410, between February 14, 2020 and March 13, 2020) groups. Based on demographic, symptomatic, and laboratory variables, a new Coronavirus estimation global (CORE-G) score for prediction of in-hospital death was established from the developmental group, and its performance was then evaluated in the validation group.

Results: The CORE-G score consisted of 18 variables (5 demographics, 2 symptoms, and 11 laboratory measurements) with a sum of 69.5 points. Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that the model performed well in the developmental group (H = 3.210, P= 0.880), and it was well validated in the validation group (H = 6.948, P= 0.542). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.955 in the developmental group (sensitivity, 94.1%; specificity, 83.4%) and 0.937 in the validation group (sensitivity, 87.2%; specificity, 84.2%). The mortality rate was not significantly different between the developmental (n = 85,20.7%) and validation (n = 94, 22.9%, P= 0.608) groups.

Conclusions: The CORE-G score provides an estimate of the risk of in-hospital death. This is the first step toward the clinical use of the CORE-G score for predicting outcome in COVID-19 patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预测COVID-19患者住院期间死亡率的新型冠状病毒估计全球评分
目的:冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)以大流行的形式存在。住院期间死亡是多因素的,迫切需要一种风险分层模型来预测COVID-19患者的住院死亡。本研究旨在构建一个风险评分系统,用于早期识别院内治疗中死亡概率高的COVID-19患者。方法:回顾性分析来自3个中心的821例确诊的COVID-19患者,分为发展组(n = 411, 2020年1月14日至2020年2月11日)和验证组(n = 410, 2020年2月14日至2020年3月13日)。基于人口学、症状和实验室变量,从发育组建立了用于预测院内死亡的新型冠状病毒估计全球(CORE-G)评分,然后在验证组中评估其表现。结果:CORE-G评分包括18个变量(5个人口统计学变量、2个症状变量和11个实验室测量变量),总分为69.5分。拟合优度检验表明,该模型在发育组中表现良好(H = 3.210, P = 0.880),在验证组中验证良好(H = 6.948, P = 0.542)。发育组受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.955(敏感性为94.1%;特异性为83.4%),验证组为0.937(敏感性为87.2%;特异性,84.2%)。发育组(n = 85,20.7%)和验证组(n = 94, 22.9%, P = 0.608)死亡率无显著差异。结论:CORE-G评分提供了院内死亡风险的估计。这是临床使用CORE-G评分预测COVID-19患者预后的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信