Research on the application effect of cognitive stimulation therapy in patients with Alzheimer's disease based on expert consultation and semistructured interviews.

Li Shuzhen, Ge Hongyan, Wu Wei, Wang Ruiying, Zamzaliza Abdul Mulud
{"title":"Research on the application effect of cognitive stimulation therapy in patients with Alzheimer's disease based on expert consultation and semistructured interviews.","authors":"Li Shuzhen,&nbsp;Ge Hongyan,&nbsp;Wu Wei,&nbsp;Wang Ruiying,&nbsp;Zamzaliza Abdul Mulud","doi":"10.47750/jptcp.2022.991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The awareness and utilization of psychological therapies for Alzheimer's disease have increased significantly in recent years. Limitations on the utilization of pharmacological therapy for Alzheimer's disease in China have corresponded with this surge in greater studies in the field. For individuals who have Alzheimer's disease, cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is a quick self-help that is founded on the theories of quality and cognitive functioning. People with Alzheimer's disease often participate in cognitive behavioral programs; however, their expense has never been studied. Being part of a meta-analysis, we analyze the application effectiveness of a CST program that is based on recent research for Alzheimer's disease patients. A CST group therapy was given to 91 Alzheimer's patients, who resided in healthcare settings or the general public, multiple times per week for 8 weeks; the other 70 people with Alzheimer's disease got a medical therapy. Costs were computed, and resource utilization was tracked for 8 weeks both before and after the therapy. It was determined by a value study. In the value study, cognition and quality of life were the major and tertiary outcomes, respectively. Contours of cost-effectiveness and acceptance were drawn. It was driven based on expert consultation and semistructured interviews. In Alzheimer's disease, CST improves intelligence and standard of living, and there was no difference in implementation expenditures between the categories. Regarding both outcome metrics, there is a significant chance that CST seems to be more expensive than conventional therapy within realistic expectations. The efficacy of CST for Alzheimer's patients is superior to conventional treatment, and it could be the greater value. The outcomes contrast well with pharmacological studies for Alzheimer's. Many people with Alzheimer's disease may benefit significantly from CST groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":73904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique","volume":"29 4","pages":"e97-e106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology = Journal de la therapeutique des populations et de la pharmacologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47750/jptcp.2022.991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The awareness and utilization of psychological therapies for Alzheimer's disease have increased significantly in recent years. Limitations on the utilization of pharmacological therapy for Alzheimer's disease in China have corresponded with this surge in greater studies in the field. For individuals who have Alzheimer's disease, cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is a quick self-help that is founded on the theories of quality and cognitive functioning. People with Alzheimer's disease often participate in cognitive behavioral programs; however, their expense has never been studied. Being part of a meta-analysis, we analyze the application effectiveness of a CST program that is based on recent research for Alzheimer's disease patients. A CST group therapy was given to 91 Alzheimer's patients, who resided in healthcare settings or the general public, multiple times per week for 8 weeks; the other 70 people with Alzheimer's disease got a medical therapy. Costs were computed, and resource utilization was tracked for 8 weeks both before and after the therapy. It was determined by a value study. In the value study, cognition and quality of life were the major and tertiary outcomes, respectively. Contours of cost-effectiveness and acceptance were drawn. It was driven based on expert consultation and semistructured interviews. In Alzheimer's disease, CST improves intelligence and standard of living, and there was no difference in implementation expenditures between the categories. Regarding both outcome metrics, there is a significant chance that CST seems to be more expensive than conventional therapy within realistic expectations. The efficacy of CST for Alzheimer's patients is superior to conventional treatment, and it could be the greater value. The outcomes contrast well with pharmacological studies for Alzheimer's. Many people with Alzheimer's disease may benefit significantly from CST groups.

基于专家咨询和半结构化访谈的认知刺激疗法在阿尔茨海默病患者中的应用效果研究
近年来,人们对阿尔茨海默病心理治疗的认识和利用显著提高。在中国,阿尔茨海默病药物治疗的局限性与该领域大量研究的激增相对应。对于患有阿尔茨海默病的个体来说,认知刺激疗法(CST)是一种基于质量和认知功能理论的快速自助疗法。阿尔茨海默病患者经常参加认知行为项目;然而,他们的花费从未被研究过。作为荟萃分析的一部分,我们分析了基于最近对阿尔茨海默病患者的研究的CST计划的应用有效性。对91名居住在医疗机构或公众场所的阿尔茨海默病患者进行CST组治疗,每周多次,持续8周;另外70名阿尔茨海默病患者接受了药物治疗。计算费用,并跟踪治疗前后8周的资源利用情况。这是由价值研究决定的。在价值研究中,认知和生活质量分别是主要和次要结果。绘制了成本效益和接受度的等高线。它是基于专家咨询和半结构化访谈。在阿尔茨海默病中,CST提高了智力和生活水平,两类之间的实施支出没有差异。考虑到这两个结果指标,在现实预期范围内,CST似乎比传统疗法更昂贵的可能性很大。CST治疗阿尔茨海默病患者的疗效优于常规治疗,具有更大的应用价值。结果与阿尔茨海默氏症的药理学研究形成了良好的对比。许多阿尔茨海默病患者可能从CST组中获益良多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信