Health and Healthcare Access for Essential, Nonessential, and Nonworkers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alyssa Shell Tilhou, Brendan Saloner, Thomas DeLeire, Susmita Chakraborty, Laura Dague
{"title":"Health and Healthcare Access for Essential, Nonessential, and Nonworkers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Alyssa Shell Tilhou, Brendan Saloner, Thomas DeLeire, Susmita Chakraborty, Laura Dague","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000002953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to describe sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare access, and health status of low-income essential, nonessential, and nonworkers during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using survey data (2020-2021) from Wisconsin Medicaid enrollees ( N = 2528), we compared sociodemographics, healthcare access, and health status between essential, nonessential, and nonworkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Essential workers had less consistent health insurance coverage and more problems paying medical bills than nonessential and nonworkers. They reported better health than nonessential and nonworkers. They reported fewer work-limiting conditions and less outpatient healthcare utilization than nonworkers but similar rates as nonessential workers. Essential workers reported masking less frequently than nonworkers but similar frequency to nonessential workers, and lower COVID-19 vaccine willingness than nonessential and nonworkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Essential workers report better health, fewer protective behaviors, and more healthcare barriers than nonessential and nonworkers. Findings indicate essential worker status may be a social determinant of health.</p>","PeriodicalId":16631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e703-e709"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to describe sociodemographic characteristics, healthcare access, and health status of low-income essential, nonessential, and nonworkers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Using survey data (2020-2021) from Wisconsin Medicaid enrollees ( N = 2528), we compared sociodemographics, healthcare access, and health status between essential, nonessential, and nonworkers.

Results: Essential workers had less consistent health insurance coverage and more problems paying medical bills than nonessential and nonworkers. They reported better health than nonessential and nonworkers. They reported fewer work-limiting conditions and less outpatient healthcare utilization than nonworkers but similar rates as nonessential workers. Essential workers reported masking less frequently than nonworkers but similar frequency to nonessential workers, and lower COVID-19 vaccine willingness than nonessential and nonworkers.

Conclusions: Essential workers report better health, fewer protective behaviors, and more healthcare barriers than nonessential and nonworkers. Findings indicate essential worker status may be a social determinant of health.

新冠肺炎大流行期间基本、非基本和非工作人员的健康和医疗保健。
目的:本研究旨在描述新冠肺炎大流行期间低收入必要、非必要和非工人的社会人口学特征、医疗保健机会和健康状况。方法:使用来自威斯康星州医疗补助注册者(N=2528)的调查数据(2020-2021),我们比较了必要、非必要和非工作者的社会人口统计、医疗保健机会和健康状况。结果:与非必要和非工人相比,必要工人的医疗保险覆盖范围不太一致,支付医疗费用的问题更多。据报道,他们的健康状况比非必要人员和非工作人员要好。他们报告说,与非工人相比,工作限制条件更少,门诊医疗利用率更低,但与非必要工人的比率相似。基本工作人员报告说,戴口罩的频率低于非工作人员,但与非基本工作人员的频率相似,新冠肺炎疫苗接种意愿低于非基本和非工作人员。结论:与非必要和非工作人员相比,必要工作人员的健康状况更好,保护行为更少,医疗保健障碍更多。研究结果表明,基本工人身份可能是健康的社会决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
402
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an indispensable guide to good health in the workplace for physicians, nurses, and researchers alike. In-depth, clinically oriented research articles and technical reports keep occupational and environmental medicine specialists up-to-date on new medical developments in the prevention, diagnosis, and rehabilitation of environmentally induced conditions and work-related injuries and illnesses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信