Internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the EMBU: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Social Development Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-15 DOI:10.1111/sode.12590
Marthe de Roo, René Veenstra, Tina Kretschmer
{"title":"Internalizing and externalizing correlates of parental overprotection as measured by the EMBU: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Marthe de Roo, René Veenstra, Tina Kretschmer","doi":"10.1111/sode.12590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aspects of parenting including overprotection explain individual differences in child adjustment. This review and meta-analysis summarizes studies on parental overprotection and internalizing and externalizing problems. To ensure that findings could be compared as systematically as possible, the focus was on studies that used the overprotection scale of the <i>Egna Minnen Beträffande Uppfostran</i> (\"Memories of my Parents' Upbringing\") (EMBU) questionnaire, a popular instrument to measure parental overprotection. In total, we extracted 176 effects from 29 studies. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to perform quality assessments for the included studies. Parental overprotection was associated positively with offspring internalizing and externalizing problems, with overall estimates ranging from <i>r </i>= .14 to .18. Moderator analyses suggested that effects of maternal were larger than effects of paternal overprotection. Other factors that moderated the strength of the association between overprotection and maladjustment included whether outcomes were self-reported or parent-reported, the design was cross-sectional or longitudinal, and publication year. Cultural context, age at exposure, and child sex did not explain differences between effect sizes. Most findings were based on cross-sectional studies and therefore do not constitute proof of causal relations. Many studies were of less-than-satisfactory quality regarding representativeness of the sample, descriptions of the data collection, and statistical analyses. There is a clear need for well-powered longitudinal studies to strengthen inferences about associations between parental overprotection and internalizing and externalizing problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48203,"journal":{"name":"Social Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b6/dd/SODE-31-962.PMC9790597.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12590","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aspects of parenting including overprotection explain individual differences in child adjustment. This review and meta-analysis summarizes studies on parental overprotection and internalizing and externalizing problems. To ensure that findings could be compared as systematically as possible, the focus was on studies that used the overprotection scale of the Egna Minnen Beträffande Uppfostran ("Memories of my Parents' Upbringing") (EMBU) questionnaire, a popular instrument to measure parental overprotection. In total, we extracted 176 effects from 29 studies. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to perform quality assessments for the included studies. Parental overprotection was associated positively with offspring internalizing and externalizing problems, with overall estimates ranging from = .14 to .18. Moderator analyses suggested that effects of maternal were larger than effects of paternal overprotection. Other factors that moderated the strength of the association between overprotection and maladjustment included whether outcomes were self-reported or parent-reported, the design was cross-sectional or longitudinal, and publication year. Cultural context, age at exposure, and child sex did not explain differences between effect sizes. Most findings were based on cross-sectional studies and therefore do not constitute proof of causal relations. Many studies were of less-than-satisfactory quality regarding representativeness of the sample, descriptions of the data collection, and statistical analyses. There is a clear need for well-powered longitudinal studies to strengthen inferences about associations between parental overprotection and internalizing and externalizing problems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过 EMBU 测量父母过度保护的内化和外化相关性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
包括过度保护在内的养育方式可以解释儿童适应能力的个体差异。本综述和荟萃分析总结了有关父母过度保护与内化和外化问题的研究。为确保尽可能系统地比较研究结果,我们重点关注了使用 Egna Minnen Beträffande Uppfostran("我父母养育我的回忆")(EMBU)问卷中过度保护量表的研究,该问卷是衡量父母过度保护的常用工具。我们总共从 29 项研究中提取了 176 项影响。我们使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale)的修订版对纳入的研究进行了质量评估。父母的过度保护与后代的内化和外化问题呈正相关,总体估计值从r = .14到.18不等。调节因素分析表明,母亲过度保护的影响大于父亲过度保护的影响。调节过度保护与适应不良之间关联强度的其他因素包括:结果是自我报告还是父母报告、设计是横截面还是纵向以及发表年份。文化背景、暴露年龄和儿童性别并不能解释效应大小之间的差异。大多数研究结果基于横断面研究,因此并不构成因果关系的证据。许多研究在样本代表性、数据收集描述和统计分析方面的质量都不尽如人意。显然,有必要进行有力的纵向研究,以加强对父母过度保护与内化和外化问题之间关系的推断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Development
Social Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Social Development is a major international journal dealing with all aspects of children"s social development as seen from a psychological stance. Coverage includes a wide range of topics such as social cognition, peer relationships, social interaction, attachment formation, emotional development and children"s theories of mind. The main emphasis is placed on development in childhood, but lifespan, cross-species and cross-cultural perspectives enhancing our understanding of human development are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信