Heidi L McNeely, Debra Quackenbush, Samantha Bothwell, Ashley Banks, John T Brinton
{"title":"Nasal Tube Securement: Randomized Controlled Trial in Pediatric Hospitalized Patients.","authors":"Heidi L McNeely, Debra Quackenbush, Samantha Bothwell, Ashley Banks, John T Brinton","doi":"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare accidental dislodgement rates of nasal gastric tubes secured with standard methods or a nasal tube securement device in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants ( n = 43) were randomized into standard securement or nasal tube securement device using block randomization to control for age and diagnosis. Surveys were collected from staff and caregivers on device ease of use and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a similar number of tube dislodgements for patients in the nasal tube securement device group ( n = 6) and the standard practice group ( n = 7). The median hospital length of stay was higher for the standard practice group (13 days vs. 9 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of the nasal tube securement device did not significantly decrease the rate of tube dislodgements compared with standard practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance to rehabilitation nursing: </strong>The study provides information for pediatric rehabilitation nurses in choosing securement options for nasal gastric tubes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49631,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Nursing","volume":"48 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare accidental dislodgement rates of nasal gastric tubes secured with standard methods or a nasal tube securement device in pediatric patients.
Design: A randomized controlled trial was conducted.
Methods: Participants ( n = 43) were randomized into standard securement or nasal tube securement device using block randomization to control for age and diagnosis. Surveys were collected from staff and caregivers on device ease of use and satisfaction.
Results: There were a similar number of tube dislodgements for patients in the nasal tube securement device group ( n = 6) and the standard practice group ( n = 7). The median hospital length of stay was higher for the standard practice group (13 days vs. 9 days).
Conclusion: Use of the nasal tube securement device did not significantly decrease the rate of tube dislodgements compared with standard practice.
Clinical relevance to rehabilitation nursing: The study provides information for pediatric rehabilitation nurses in choosing securement options for nasal gastric tubes.
期刊介绍：
Rehabilitation Nursing is a refereed, award-winning publication and is the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. Its purpose is to provide rehabilitation professionals with high-quality articles with a primary focus on rehabilitation nursing. Topics range from administration and research to education and clinical topics, and nursing perspectives, with continuing education opportunities in every issue.
Articles range from administration and research to education and clinical topics; nursing perspectives, resource reviews, and product information; and continuing education opportunities in every issue.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
