Constructing Statistical Intervals for Small Area Estimates Based on Generalized Linear Mixed Model in Health Surveys.

Yan Wang, Xingyou Zhang, Hua Lu, Janet B Croft, Kurt J Greenlund
{"title":"Constructing Statistical Intervals for Small Area Estimates Based on Generalized Linear Mixed Model in Health Surveys.","authors":"Yan Wang, Xingyou Zhang, Hua Lu, Janet B Croft, Kurt J Greenlund","doi":"10.4236/ojs.2022.121005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) has been widely used in small area estimation for health indicators. Bayesian estimation is usually used to construct statistical intervals, however, its computational intensity is a big challenge for large complex surveys. Frequentist approaches, such as bootstrapping, and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, are also applied but not evaluated in terms of the interval magnitude, width, and the computational time consumed. The 2013 Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data was used as a case study. County-level estimated prevalence of three health-related outcomes was obtained through a GLMM; and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated from bootstrapping and MC simulation. The intervals were compared to 95% credential intervals through a hierarchial Bayesian model. The results showed that 95% CIs for county-level estimates of each outcome by using MC simulation were similar to the 95% credible intervals generated by Bayesian estimation and were the most computationally efficient. It could be a viable option for constructing statistical intervals for small area estimation in public health practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":59624,"journal":{"name":"统计学期刊(英文)","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9336217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"统计学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2022.121005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) has been widely used in small area estimation for health indicators. Bayesian estimation is usually used to construct statistical intervals, however, its computational intensity is a big challenge for large complex surveys. Frequentist approaches, such as bootstrapping, and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, are also applied but not evaluated in terms of the interval magnitude, width, and the computational time consumed. The 2013 Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data was used as a case study. County-level estimated prevalence of three health-related outcomes was obtained through a GLMM; and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated from bootstrapping and MC simulation. The intervals were compared to 95% credential intervals through a hierarchial Bayesian model. The results showed that 95% CIs for county-level estimates of each outcome by using MC simulation were similar to the 95% credible intervals generated by Bayesian estimation and were the most computationally efficient. It could be a viable option for constructing statistical intervals for small area estimation in public health practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于广义线性混合模型的小面积估算统计区间的构建
广义线性混合模型(GLMM)在健康指标小面积估计中得到了广泛的应用。贝叶斯估计通常用于构造统计区间,但其计算强度对大型复杂调查来说是一个很大的挑战。频率学方法,如自举和蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟,也被应用,但没有根据区间大小、宽度和计算时间进行评估。2013年佛罗里达州行为风险因素监测系统数据被用作案例研究。通过GLMM获得了三种健康相关结果的县级估计患病率;95%置信区间(ci)由bootapping和MC模拟生成。通过层次贝叶斯模型将这些区间与95%的可信区间进行比较。结果表明,MC模拟对每个结果的县级估计的95% ci与贝叶斯估计产生的95%可信区间相似,是最具计算效率的。在公共卫生实践中,构建小面积估计的统计区间是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
571
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信