Frequency, geographical distribution and outcomes of pit viper bites in Malaysia consulted to Remote Envenomation Consultancy Services (RECS) from 2017 to 2020.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Pub Date : 2023-08-16 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0011569
Reza Murad Qamruddin, Ruth Sabrina Safferi, Zainalabidin Mohamed Ismail, Mohd Shukruddeen Salleh, Muhammad Nadzmi Hadi Abd Hamid, Vera Effa Rezar Frederic Ng, Wan Chee Goh, Ahmad Khaldun Ismail
{"title":"Frequency, geographical distribution and outcomes of pit viper bites in Malaysia consulted to Remote Envenomation Consultancy Services (RECS) from 2017 to 2020.","authors":"Reza Murad Qamruddin,&nbsp;Ruth Sabrina Safferi,&nbsp;Zainalabidin Mohamed Ismail,&nbsp;Mohd Shukruddeen Salleh,&nbsp;Muhammad Nadzmi Hadi Abd Hamid,&nbsp;Vera Effa Rezar Frederic Ng,&nbsp;Wan Chee Goh,&nbsp;Ahmad Khaldun Ismail","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0011569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Not all pit viper species are present in every state of Malaysia and their distribution varies according to altitude. There is limited information on pit viper bite incidence and its geographical distribution. This was a cross-sectional study of confirmed pit viper bite cases referred to Remote Envenomation Consultancy Services (RECS) from January 2017 to December 2020. Data was collected following the approval of institutional research ethics committee. Universal sampling methods were used. Confirmed pit viper bite cases in each state, geographical location and the antivenom used were reported. A total of 523 confirmed pit viper bite injuries occurred over the 4-year study period. The majority were Malaysians, male and young adults. Most were non-occupational related (83.9%) and involved the upper limbs (46.8%). The commonest pit viper species involved was Trimeresurus purpureomaculatus (23.7%). Green pit viper antivenom (GPAV) was the most frequent antivenom used (n = 51) with the majority of patients requiring only one dose (3 vials). This study provides a better appreciation of indigenous pit viper species distribution for each state and reflects the requirement of appropriate antivenom to be stocked in each state or district hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":20260,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":"17 8","pages":"e0011569"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10461839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011569","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Not all pit viper species are present in every state of Malaysia and their distribution varies according to altitude. There is limited information on pit viper bite incidence and its geographical distribution. This was a cross-sectional study of confirmed pit viper bite cases referred to Remote Envenomation Consultancy Services (RECS) from January 2017 to December 2020. Data was collected following the approval of institutional research ethics committee. Universal sampling methods were used. Confirmed pit viper bite cases in each state, geographical location and the antivenom used were reported. A total of 523 confirmed pit viper bite injuries occurred over the 4-year study period. The majority were Malaysians, male and young adults. Most were non-occupational related (83.9%) and involved the upper limbs (46.8%). The commonest pit viper species involved was Trimeresurus purpureomaculatus (23.7%). Green pit viper antivenom (GPAV) was the most frequent antivenom used (n = 51) with the majority of patients requiring only one dose (3 vials). This study provides a better appreciation of indigenous pit viper species distribution for each state and reflects the requirement of appropriate antivenom to be stocked in each state or district hospital.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2017年至2020年,马来西亚的毒蛇咬伤频率、地理分布和结果咨询了远程包络咨询服务公司(RECS)。
并非所有的斑蝰物种都存在于马来西亚的每个州,它们的分布因海拔高度而异。关于毒蛇咬伤的发生率及其地理分布的信息有限。这是一项针对2017年1月至2020年12月提交给远程包络咨询服务公司(RECS)的确诊毒蛇咬伤病例的横断面研究。数据是在机构研究伦理委员会批准后收集的。采用了通用取样方法。报告了每个州、地理位置和使用的抗蛇毒血清中确诊的毒蛇咬伤病例。在为期4年的研究期间,共有523起已确认的毒蛇咬伤事件发生。大多数是马来西亚人、男性和年轻人。大多数是非职业相关的(83.9%),涉及上肢(46.8%)。最常见的斑蝰种类是紫浆单体Trimereurus purpureomaculatus(23.7%)。绿斑蝰抗蛇毒血清(GPAV)是使用最频繁的抗蛇毒血清,(n=51),大多数患者只需要一剂(3瓶)。这项研究更好地了解了各州本土斑蝰的物种分布,并反映了各州或地区医院对储存适当抗蛇毒血清的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
723
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy. The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability. All aspects of these diseases are considered, including: Pathogenesis Clinical features Pharmacology and treatment Diagnosis Epidemiology Vector biology Vaccinology and prevention Demographic, ecological and social determinants Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信