Early Empirical Anidulafungin Reduces the Prevalence of Invasive Candidiasis in Critically Ill Patients: A Case-control Study.

Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.2478/jccm-2022-0006
Md Jahidul Hasan, Sharmind Neelotpol, Raihan Rabbani
{"title":"Early Empirical Anidulafungin Reduces the Prevalence of Invasive Candidiasis in Critically Ill Patients: A Case-control Study.","authors":"Md Jahidul Hasan,&nbsp;Sharmind Neelotpol,&nbsp;Raihan Rabbani","doi":"10.2478/jccm-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Invasive candidiasis (IC) in critically ill patients is a serious infection with high rate of mortality. As an empirical therapy, like antibiotics, the use of antifungals is not common in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. The empirical use of echinocandins including anidulafungin is a recent trend.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the impact of empirical anidulafungin in the development of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients in ICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study was conducted on 149 patients with sepsis with/without septic shock and bacterial pneumonia. All the patients were divided into two groups. The 'control group' termed as 'NEAT group' received no empirical anidulafungin therapy and the 'treated group' termed as 'EAT group' received empirical anidulafungin therapy in early hospitalization hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two and 77 patients were divided into the control and the treated group, respectively. Patients in EAT group showed less incidences of IC (5.19%) than that of the NEAT group (29.17%) (p = 0.001). Here, the relative risk (RR) was 0.175 (95% CI, 0.064-0.493) and the risk difference (RD) rate was 24% (95% CI, 12.36%-35.58%). The 30-day all-cause mortality rate in NEAT group was higher (19.44%) than that of in EAT group (10.39%) (p = 0.04). Within the first 10-ICU-day, patients in the EAT group left ICU in higher rate (62.34%) than that in the NEAT group (54.17%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early empirical anidulafungin within 6 h of ICU admission reduced the risk of invasive candidiasis, 30-day all-cause mortality rate and increased ICU leaving rate within 10-day of ICU admission in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9097641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Invasive candidiasis (IC) in critically ill patients is a serious infection with high rate of mortality. As an empirical therapy, like antibiotics, the use of antifungals is not common in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. The empirical use of echinocandins including anidulafungin is a recent trend.

Aim of the study: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of empirical anidulafungin in the development of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients in ICU.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted on 149 patients with sepsis with/without septic shock and bacterial pneumonia. All the patients were divided into two groups. The 'control group' termed as 'NEAT group' received no empirical anidulafungin therapy and the 'treated group' termed as 'EAT group' received empirical anidulafungin therapy in early hospitalization hours.

Results: Seventy-two and 77 patients were divided into the control and the treated group, respectively. Patients in EAT group showed less incidences of IC (5.19%) than that of the NEAT group (29.17%) (p = 0.001). Here, the relative risk (RR) was 0.175 (95% CI, 0.064-0.493) and the risk difference (RD) rate was 24% (95% CI, 12.36%-35.58%). The 30-day all-cause mortality rate in NEAT group was higher (19.44%) than that of in EAT group (10.39%) (p = 0.04). Within the first 10-ICU-day, patients in the EAT group left ICU in higher rate (62.34%) than that in the NEAT group (54.17%).

Conclusion: Early empirical anidulafungin within 6 h of ICU admission reduced the risk of invasive candidiasis, 30-day all-cause mortality rate and increased ICU leaving rate within 10-day of ICU admission in critically ill patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享
查看原文
早期经验性Anidulafungin降低危重患者侵袭性念珠菌病的患病率:一项病例对照研究。
摘要侵袭性念珠菌病(Invasive candidiasis, IC)是危重患者的一种严重感染,病死率高。与抗生素一样,作为一种经验性治疗,抗真菌药物在全球重症监护病房(icu)的使用并不常见。针叶棘白素的实证使用,包括阿杜拉芬素是最近的趋势。研究目的:本研究的目的是评估经控性止痛剂对ICU危重患者侵袭性念珠菌病发展的影响。方法:对149例脓毒症合并/不合并感染性休克合并细菌性肺炎患者进行回顾性病例对照研究。所有患者分为两组。被称为“NEAT组”的“对照组”未接受经验性抗麻醉药治疗,被称为“EAT组”的“治疗组”在住院早期接受经验性抗麻醉药治疗。结果:将72例患者和77例患者分别分为对照组和治疗组。EAT组患者IC发生率(5.19%)低于NEAT组(29.17%)(p = 0.001)。此处,相对危险度(RR)为0.175 (95% CI, 0.064-0.493),风险差(RD)率为24% (95% CI, 12.36%-35.58%)。NEAT组30天全因死亡率(19.44%)高于EAT组(10.39%)(p = 0.04)。在前10个ICU天内,EAT组患者出院率(62.34%)高于NEAT组(54.17%)。结论:危重患者入院后6 h内早期应用经导性阿尼弗宁可降低侵袭性念珠菌感染的风险,降低30天全因死亡率,增加10天内的出院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信