Combining MRI and Spectral EEG for Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes in Preterm Infants.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Neonatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000530648
Tone Nordvik, Andres Server, Cathrine N Espeland, Eva M Schumacher, Pål G Larsson, Are H Pripp, Tom Stiris
{"title":"Combining MRI and Spectral EEG for Assessment of Neurocognitive Outcomes in Preterm Infants.","authors":"Tone Nordvik,&nbsp;Andres Server,&nbsp;Cathrine N Espeland,&nbsp;Eva M Schumacher,&nbsp;Pål G Larsson,&nbsp;Are H Pripp,&nbsp;Tom Stiris","doi":"10.1159/000530648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Predicting impairment in preterm children is challenging. Our aim is to explore the association between MRI at term-equivalent age (TEA) and neurocognitive outcomes in late childhood and to assess whether the addition of EEG improves prognostication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included forty infants with gestational age 24 + 0-30 + 6. Children were monitored with multichannel EEG for 72 h after birth. Total absolute band power for the delta band on day 2 was calculated. Brain MRI was performed at TEA and scored according to the Kidokoro scoring system. At 10-12 years of age, we evaluated neurocognitive outcomes with Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 4th edition, Vineland adaptive behavior scales 2nd edition and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. We performed linear regression analysis to examine the association between outcomes and MRI and EEG, respectively, and multiple regression analysis to explore the combination of MRI and EEG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty infants were included. There was a significant association between global brain abnormality score and composite outcomes of WISC and Vineland test, but not the BRIEF test. The adjusted R2 was 0.16 and 0.08, respectively. For EEG, adjusted R2 was 0.34 and 0.15, respectively. When combining MRI and EEG data, adjusted R2 changed to 0.36 for WISC and 0.16 for the Vineland test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a small association between TEA MRI and neurocognitive outcomes in late childhood. Adding EEG to the model improved the explained variance. Combining EEG and MRI data did not have any additional benefit over EEG alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":18924,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":"120 4","pages":"482-490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Predicting impairment in preterm children is challenging. Our aim is to explore the association between MRI at term-equivalent age (TEA) and neurocognitive outcomes in late childhood and to assess whether the addition of EEG improves prognostication.

Methods: This prospective observational study included forty infants with gestational age 24 + 0-30 + 6. Children were monitored with multichannel EEG for 72 h after birth. Total absolute band power for the delta band on day 2 was calculated. Brain MRI was performed at TEA and scored according to the Kidokoro scoring system. At 10-12 years of age, we evaluated neurocognitive outcomes with Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children 4th edition, Vineland adaptive behavior scales 2nd edition and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. We performed linear regression analysis to examine the association between outcomes and MRI and EEG, respectively, and multiple regression analysis to explore the combination of MRI and EEG.

Results: Forty infants were included. There was a significant association between global brain abnormality score and composite outcomes of WISC and Vineland test, but not the BRIEF test. The adjusted R2 was 0.16 and 0.08, respectively. For EEG, adjusted R2 was 0.34 and 0.15, respectively. When combining MRI and EEG data, adjusted R2 changed to 0.36 for WISC and 0.16 for the Vineland test.

Conclusion: There was a small association between TEA MRI and neurocognitive outcomes in late childhood. Adding EEG to the model improved the explained variance. Combining EEG and MRI data did not have any additional benefit over EEG alone.

结合MRI和频谱脑电图评估早产儿神经认知预后。
前言:预测早产儿的损伤是具有挑战性的。我们的目的是探讨期等值年龄(TEA) MRI与儿童晚期神经认知结果之间的关系,并评估脑电图的增加是否能改善预后。方法:本前瞻性观察研究纳入40例胎龄24 + 0-30 + 6的婴儿。患儿出生后72h进行多通道脑电图监测。计算第2天δ波段的总绝对波段功率。在TEA时进行脑MRI,并根据Kidokoro评分系统进行评分。在10-12岁时,我们使用韦氏儿童智力量表第4版、Vineland适应行为量表第2版和执行功能行为评定量表评估神经认知结果。我们分别用线性回归分析来检验结果与MRI和EEG的相关性,用多元回归分析来探讨MRI和EEG的结合。结果:共纳入40例婴儿。整体脑异常评分与WISC和Vineland测试的综合结果有显著相关性,而BRIEF测试无显著相关性。调整后的R2分别为0.16和0.08。EEG校正R2分别为0.34和0.15。当合并MRI和EEG数据时,WISC的调整R2为0.36,Vineland试验的调整R2为0.16。结论:TEA MRI与儿童晚期神经认知预后之间存在较小的相关性。在模型中加入脑电图可以改善解释方差。结合脑电图和MRI数据没有任何额外的好处比单独脑电图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neonatology
Neonatology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This highly respected and frequently cited journal is a prime source of information in the area of fetal and neonatal research. Original papers present research on all aspects of neonatology, fetal medicine and developmental biology. These papers encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology. Basic science research covers molecular biology, molecular genetics, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology in fetal and neonatal life. In addition to the classic features the journal accepts papers for the sections Research Briefings and Sources of Neonatal Medicine (historical pieces). Papers reporting results of animal studies should be based upon hypotheses that relate to developmental processes or disorders in the human fetus or neonate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信