Improving patient handover: A narrative review.

Zahra Khalaf
{"title":"Improving patient handover: A narrative review.","authors":"Zahra Khalaf","doi":"10.4103/ajps.ajps_82_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical handover process has been directly associated with patient safety. Improving patient handover can improve patients' safety and ultimate outcomes; therefore, this review was conducted to examine the literature available on interventions that make handovers more effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (EBSCO) was searched for interventions that improve the efficacy of clinical handovers. Studies were excluded if they were irrelevant, not published in peer-reviewed journals, not published in English, or were based on animal studies. A total of 1087 publications were retrieved and sorted by relevance. The eligibility of the articles was determined by reading through the titles and abstracts then full texts, and reference searching. Six studies were selected for this literature review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A number of handover interventions were explored. One intervention was changing the handover location to patients' bedside; Bradley et al. found that bedside handovers decreased handover time and patient adverse events. Another intervention was providing education on handovers which Sand-Jecklin et al. associated with reductions in adverse events. Moreover, Lee et al. used simulation-based education and found that it significantly improved nurses' knowledge, performance competence, and self-efficacy. Another intervention was the transforming care at the bedside (TCAB) framework which incorporated multidimensional strategies and emphasized handover as part of patient centeredness; these strategies improved patient safety, yet the results cannot be attributed solely to handover modifications. Meanwhile, Hada et al. implemented a mixture of interventions and found that they improved patient safety and reduced adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interventions explored were bedside handovers, providing education and simulation-based education on handovers, emphasizing patient centeredness as part of TCAB strategies, and implementing a mixture of interventions. All interventions reduced adverse events, although some improvements were not significant. Due to the limited evidence available to support the efficacy of the interventions on improving clinical handovers, the results remain inconclusive.</p>","PeriodicalId":72123,"journal":{"name":"African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS","volume":"20 3","pages":"166-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/71/AJPS-20-166.PMC10450103.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.ajps_82_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical handover process has been directly associated with patient safety. Improving patient handover can improve patients' safety and ultimate outcomes; therefore, this review was conducted to examine the literature available on interventions that make handovers more effective.

Methods: MEDLINE (EBSCO) was searched for interventions that improve the efficacy of clinical handovers. Studies were excluded if they were irrelevant, not published in peer-reviewed journals, not published in English, or were based on animal studies. A total of 1087 publications were retrieved and sorted by relevance. The eligibility of the articles was determined by reading through the titles and abstracts then full texts, and reference searching. Six studies were selected for this literature review.

Results: A number of handover interventions were explored. One intervention was changing the handover location to patients' bedside; Bradley et al. found that bedside handovers decreased handover time and patient adverse events. Another intervention was providing education on handovers which Sand-Jecklin et al. associated with reductions in adverse events. Moreover, Lee et al. used simulation-based education and found that it significantly improved nurses' knowledge, performance competence, and self-efficacy. Another intervention was the transforming care at the bedside (TCAB) framework which incorporated multidimensional strategies and emphasized handover as part of patient centeredness; these strategies improved patient safety, yet the results cannot be attributed solely to handover modifications. Meanwhile, Hada et al. implemented a mixture of interventions and found that they improved patient safety and reduced adverse events.

Conclusion: The interventions explored were bedside handovers, providing education and simulation-based education on handovers, emphasizing patient centeredness as part of TCAB strategies, and implementing a mixture of interventions. All interventions reduced adverse events, although some improvements were not significant. Due to the limited evidence available to support the efficacy of the interventions on improving clinical handovers, the results remain inconclusive.

改进患者交接:叙述性回顾。
引言:临床交接过程与患者安全直接相关。改善患者交接可以提高患者的安全性和最终结果;因此,进行这篇综述是为了检查现有的干预措施,使移交更有效的文献。方法:检索MEDLINE(EBSCO)干预措施,以提高临床移交的疗效。如果研究不相关、未在同行评审期刊上发表、未以英语发表或基于动物研究,则将其排除在外。共检索到1087份出版物,并按相关性进行了排序。文章的合格性是通过阅读标题和摘要,然后阅读全文和参考文献搜索来确定的。本文献综述选择了六项研究。结果:研究了一些交接干预措施。一项干预措施是将交接地点改为患者床边;Bradley等人发现,床边交接减少了交接时间和患者不良事件。另一项干预措施是提供交接方面的教育,Sand-Jecklin等人将此与不良事件的减少联系起来。此外,Lee等人使用了基于模拟的教育,发现它显著提高了护士的知识、表现能力和自我效能。另一项干预措施是改变床边护理(TCAB)框架,该框架纳入了多维策略,并强调交接是以患者为中心的一部分;这些策略提高了患者的安全性,但结果不能仅仅归因于切换修改。与此同时,Hada等人实施了多种干预措施,发现它们提高了患者的安全性,减少了不良事件。结论:探索的干预措施是床边交接,提供关于交接的教育和基于模拟的教育,强调以患者为中心作为TCAB策略的一部分,并实施混合干预措施。所有干预措施都减少了不良事件,尽管有些改善并不显著。由于支持干预措施改善临床交接效果的证据有限,结果仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信