Coping with digital market re-organization: How the hotel industry strategically responds to digital platform power.

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q2 BUSINESS
Philip Balsiger, Thomas Jammet, Nicola Cianferoni, Muriel Surdez
{"title":"Coping with digital market re-organization: How the hotel industry strategically responds to digital platform power.","authors":"Philip Balsiger,&nbsp;Thomas Jammet,&nbsp;Nicola Cianferoni,&nbsp;Muriel Surdez","doi":"10.1177/10245294211055612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How do organizations in a sector where powerful platforms have emerged cope with the new constraints and opportunities that platforms induce? A growing number of studies highlight the power of digital platforms to re-organize markets and thereby create new forms of dependence. But there are also indications that organizations are capable of countering platform power especially by demanding their regulation. This paper expands this view to investigate also strategies at the organizational level. It draws on the algorithmic game studies of strategic responses to environmental changes to study how organizations strategically respond to the rise of digital platforms. To show organizations' capacities to cope with the new digital market environment, we use a qualitative case study of the Swiss hotel sector and its reactions to so-called online travel agencies, based on interviews with hotel managers and professional representatives. We distinguish between three types of hotels-small family-run, luxury, and chain hotels, and identify three types of strategic responses: bypassing, optimizing, and mitigating. Contrary to a platform power perspective, we find some evidence for organizations' capacity to keep platforms at bay, by limiting dependence through mitigation, and platforms' reach through bypassing. Hotels also learn to \"play the algorithmic game\" and take advantage of platforms' technological affordances, but such strategies seem to accommodate platform power rather than countering it. Finally, we find that hotels with fewer resources (small family-run hotels) are less equipped to counter platform power, suggesting that platforms risk fostering existing hierarchies and segmentation in markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":46999,"journal":{"name":"Competition & Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9780750/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition & Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294211055612","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

How do organizations in a sector where powerful platforms have emerged cope with the new constraints and opportunities that platforms induce? A growing number of studies highlight the power of digital platforms to re-organize markets and thereby create new forms of dependence. But there are also indications that organizations are capable of countering platform power especially by demanding their regulation. This paper expands this view to investigate also strategies at the organizational level. It draws on the algorithmic game studies of strategic responses to environmental changes to study how organizations strategically respond to the rise of digital platforms. To show organizations' capacities to cope with the new digital market environment, we use a qualitative case study of the Swiss hotel sector and its reactions to so-called online travel agencies, based on interviews with hotel managers and professional representatives. We distinguish between three types of hotels-small family-run, luxury, and chain hotels, and identify three types of strategic responses: bypassing, optimizing, and mitigating. Contrary to a platform power perspective, we find some evidence for organizations' capacity to keep platforms at bay, by limiting dependence through mitigation, and platforms' reach through bypassing. Hotels also learn to "play the algorithmic game" and take advantage of platforms' technological affordances, but such strategies seem to accommodate platform power rather than countering it. Finally, we find that hotels with fewer resources (small family-run hotels) are less equipped to counter platform power, suggesting that platforms risk fostering existing hierarchies and segmentation in markets.

Abstract Image

应对数字市场重组:酒店业如何战略性地应对数字平台力量。
在一个强大的平台已经出现的行业中,组织如何应对平台带来的新限制和机遇?越来越多的研究强调了数字平台重组市场的力量,从而创造了新的依赖形式。但也有迹象表明,组织有能力对抗平台的力量,尤其是通过要求平台进行监管。本文将这一观点扩展到组织层面的战略研究。它利用对环境变化的战略反应的算法博弈研究来研究组织如何从战略上应对数字平台的兴起。为了展示企业应对新数字市场环境的能力,我们基于对酒店经理和专业代表的采访,对瑞士酒店业及其对所谓在线旅行社的反应进行了定性案例研究。我们区分了三种类型的酒店——小型家庭式酒店、豪华酒店和连锁酒店,并确定了三种类型的战略对策:绕过、优化和缓解。与平台力量的观点相反,我们发现了一些证据,表明组织有能力通过缓解来限制对平台的依赖,通过绕过来限制平台的影响。酒店也学会了“玩算法游戏”,并利用平台的技术支持,但这些策略似乎是为了适应平台的力量,而不是对抗它。最后,我们发现资源较少的酒店(小型家庭经营的酒店)对抗平台力量的能力较差,这表明平台有可能助长市场中现有的等级制度和细分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信