Competency-based education in undergraduate clinical prosthodontics: A paradigm shift in training

Mohamed A. Alkhodary, Ra'fat I. Farah, Atef I. Ghobashy
{"title":"Competency-based education in undergraduate clinical prosthodontics: A paradigm shift in training","authors":"Mohamed A. Alkhodary,&nbsp;Ra'fat I. Farah,&nbsp;Atef I. Ghobashy","doi":"10.1002/cbe2.1220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Competency-based education (CBE) is thought to improve the quality of dental graduates than traditional education (TE). This study compared the students' final scores in clinical training of prosthodontics using CBE versus TE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study enrolled 459 fourth- and fifth-year undergraduate students. Of the participants, 231 students (143 males and 88 females) attended TE and 228 (128 males and 100 females) attended CBE. This study considered the final scores that the students achieved for their competency cases and compared it with the scores achieved during the TE process. Statistical analysis of results used the Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test for nonparametric numbers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean score of the clinical examination for all students in clinical prosthodontics courses was 81.4 (maximum and minimum scores: 95.0 and 41.3, respectively). The mean scores in the traditional and competency-based education groups were 79.9 ± 6.48 and 82.9 ± 6.87, respectively. Scores in the competency education group (mean rank = 265.08) were statistically significantly higher than in the conventional education group (mean rank = 195.38) with <i>U</i> = 18,336, <i>z</i> = −5.631, and <i>p</i> &lt; .001.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The application of CBE allowed the students to achieve higher scores in prosthodontics than the TE.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1220","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Introduction

Competency-based education (CBE) is thought to improve the quality of dental graduates than traditional education (TE). This study compared the students' final scores in clinical training of prosthodontics using CBE versus TE.

Materials and Methods

This study enrolled 459 fourth- and fifth-year undergraduate students. Of the participants, 231 students (143 males and 88 females) attended TE and 228 (128 males and 100 females) attended CBE. This study considered the final scores that the students achieved for their competency cases and compared it with the scores achieved during the TE process. Statistical analysis of results used the Mann–Whitney U test for nonparametric numbers.

Results

The mean score of the clinical examination for all students in clinical prosthodontics courses was 81.4 (maximum and minimum scores: 95.0 and 41.3, respectively). The mean scores in the traditional and competency-based education groups were 79.9 ± 6.48 and 82.9 ± 6.87, respectively. Scores in the competency education group (mean rank = 265.08) were statistically significantly higher than in the conventional education group (mean rank = 195.38) with U = 18,336, z = −5.631, and p < .001.

Conclusions

The application of CBE allowed the students to achieve higher scores in prosthodontics than the TE.

Abstract Image

以能力为本的本科临床口腔修复学教育:训练模式的转变
能力本位教育(CBE)被认为比传统教育(TE)更能提高牙科毕业生的素质。本研究比较了CBE与TE在口腔修复临床训练中的最终成绩。材料与方法本研究共招募459名四、五年级本科生。在参与者中,231名学生(143名男性和88名女性)参加了TE, 228名学生(128名男性和100名女性)参加了CBE。本研究考虑学生胜任力案例的最终得分,并将其与TE过程中的得分进行比较。统计分析结果使用非参数数的Mann-Whitney U检验。结果所有临床口腔修复学专业学生的临床考试平均得分为81.4分,最高分数为95.0分,最低分数为41.3分。传统教育组和能力本位教育组的平均得分分别为79.9±6.48分和82.9±6.87分。胜任力教育组得分(平均排名为265.08)显著高于传统教育组得分(平均排名为195.38),U = 18336, z = - 5.631, p <措施。结论CBE的应用使学生在口腔修复学中取得了比TE更高的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信