Developing a work well-being questionnaire for social- and health-care managers.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Niina Herttuala, Anne Konu, Lauri Kokkinen
{"title":"Developing a work well-being questionnaire for social- and health-care managers.","authors":"Niina Herttuala,&nbsp;Anne Konu,&nbsp;Lauri Kokkinen","doi":"10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is a need for up-to-date research on health-care and social managers' work well-being. The purpose was to develop a questionnaire for measuring health-care and social managers' subjective work well-being and to determine whether their background factors are connected to their work well-being.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The authors developed a questionnaire based on their previous health-care and social managers' work well-being framework. It covers 5 separate categories: 1) individual factors, 2) social factors, 3) professional support from one's own manager, 4) organizational factors, and 5) work-related factors. Using statistical methods, the authors examined the questionnaire's internal validity, its fit with the framework, and the connections between several background factors and work well-being. The survey data (N = 281) were collected from South Osthrobothnia and Central Osthrobothnia in Finland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire's internal validity was good, and it fit rather well with the authors' previous framework. Managers' work well-being was highest for the category of \"professional support from one's own manager\" and lowest for \"organizational factors.\" The authors found connections between different categories of work well-being and a) years of managerial experience, b) level of management, and c) occupational group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The questionnaire gives a holistic view of managers' work well-being and is suit- able for measuring work well-being in the social- and health-care context. An examination showed that there is a need to improve the individual situations of the social- and health-care managers. The questionnaire can be used to assess managers' work well-being and to build a knowledge base for developing organizational policies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(6):665-78.</p>","PeriodicalId":14173,"journal":{"name":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/18/8d/ijomeh-35-665.PMC10464797.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01910","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: There is a need for up-to-date research on health-care and social managers' work well-being. The purpose was to develop a questionnaire for measuring health-care and social managers' subjective work well-being and to determine whether their background factors are connected to their work well-being.

Material and methods: The authors developed a questionnaire based on their previous health-care and social managers' work well-being framework. It covers 5 separate categories: 1) individual factors, 2) social factors, 3) professional support from one's own manager, 4) organizational factors, and 5) work-related factors. Using statistical methods, the authors examined the questionnaire's internal validity, its fit with the framework, and the connections between several background factors and work well-being. The survey data (N = 281) were collected from South Osthrobothnia and Central Osthrobothnia in Finland.

Results: The questionnaire's internal validity was good, and it fit rather well with the authors' previous framework. Managers' work well-being was highest for the category of "professional support from one's own manager" and lowest for "organizational factors." The authors found connections between different categories of work well-being and a) years of managerial experience, b) level of management, and c) occupational group.

Conclusions: The questionnaire gives a holistic view of managers' work well-being and is suit- able for measuring work well-being in the social- and health-care context. An examination showed that there is a need to improve the individual situations of the social- and health-care managers. The questionnaire can be used to assess managers' work well-being and to build a knowledge base for developing organizational policies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(6):665-78.

Abstract Image

为社会和保健管理人员编制工作幸福感问卷。
目标:需要对保健和社会管理人员的工作福利进行最新的研究。目的是编制一份调查问卷,用于衡量保健和社会管理人员的主观工作幸福感,并确定他们的背景因素是否与他们的工作幸福感有关。材料和方法:作者根据他们以前的卫生保健和社会管理人员的工作幸福感框架开发了一份问卷。它包括5个不同的类别:1)个人因素,2)社会因素,3)来自自己经理的专业支持,4)组织因素,5)工作相关因素。利用统计方法,作者检验了问卷的内部效度、与框架的契合度,以及几个背景因素与工作幸福感之间的联系。调查数据(N = 281)来自芬兰的South Osthrobothnia和Central Osthrobothnia。结果:问卷的内部效度较好,与作者之前的框架吻合较好。经理们的工作幸福感在“来自自己经理的专业支持”这一项中最高,在“组织因素”这一项中最低。作者发现,不同类别的工作幸福感与a)管理经验年限、b)管理水平和c)职业群体之间存在联系。结论:调查问卷给出了管理者的工作福祉的整体观点,并适合于测量工作福祉在社会和卫生保健的背景下。一项检查表明,有必要改善社会和保健管理人员的个人状况。该问卷可用于评估管理人员的工作幸福感,并为制定组织政策建立知识库。中华医学杂志,2010;35(6):665- 678。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal is dedicated to present the contemporary research in occupational and environmental health from all over the world. It publishes works concerning: occupational and environmental: medicine, epidemiology, hygiene and toxicology; work physiology and ergonomics, musculoskeletal problems; psychosocial factors at work, work-related mental problems, aging, work ability and return to work; working hours, shift work; reproductive factors and endocrine disruptors; radiation, ionizing and non-ionizing health effects; agricultural hazards; work safety and injury and occupational health service; climate change and its effects on health; omics, genetics and epigenetics in occupational and environmental health; health effects of exposure to nanoparticles and nanotechnology products; human biomarkers in occupational and environmental health, intervention studies, clinical sciences’ achievements with potential to improve occupational and environmental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信