THE HISTORY OF SYPHILIS IN THE XVI CENTURY AND THE PIVOTAL ROLE OF LUIGI LUIGINI IN THE RENAISSANCE

IF 0.2 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Mariano Martini, Emanuele Armocida, Luca Lo Basso, Emiliano Beri, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Alessandra Parodi
{"title":"THE HISTORY OF SYPHILIS IN THE XVI CENTURY AND THE PIVOTAL ROLE OF LUIGI LUIGINI IN THE RENAISSANCE","authors":"Mariano Martini,&nbsp;Emanuele Armocida,&nbsp;Luca Lo Basso,&nbsp;Emiliano Beri,&nbsp;Nicola Luigi Bragazzi,&nbsp;Alessandra Parodi","doi":"10.31952/amha.18.2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Syphilis is the prime example of a \"new disease\" which triggered a transnational (European) discussion among physicians. It appeared between the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of the Modern Times (at the beginning of the sixteenth century), a time in which medicine was changing from a dogmatic to an experimental discipline. The main changes were in the field of anatomy: in 1543, the same year of the astronomy-disrupting work by Nicolas Copernicus, the new less dogmatic and more empirical approach to anatomy by Andreas Vesalius was published. Nevertheless, in the Renaissance, medicine remains a tradition-bound discipline, proud of its millennial history and its superiority over the empirical, non-academic healers. When syphilis appeared in Europe, several explanations were elaborated. In the mid-16th century, an Italian doctor Luigi Luigini (born in 1526) published in Venice a collection of all the works on syphilis that appeared until 1566. He wanted to entrust to colleagues, contemporary and future, a compendium of all that was known about the \"new\" disease (the Latin term Novus means both \"new\" and \"strange\"). According to the most authors of the collection, the disease is in fact \"new\" and \"strange\". Some authors of the collection find it impossible that authorities like Hippocrates and Galen overlooked it. Luigini's work shows the authors' effort to absorb syphilis in the corpus of academic medicine and affirm the authority of academic physicians against the empirical healers.</p>","PeriodicalId":42656,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica","volume":"18 2","pages":"375-397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31952/amha.18.2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Syphilis is the prime example of a "new disease" which triggered a transnational (European) discussion among physicians. It appeared between the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of the Modern Times (at the beginning of the sixteenth century), a time in which medicine was changing from a dogmatic to an experimental discipline. The main changes were in the field of anatomy: in 1543, the same year of the astronomy-disrupting work by Nicolas Copernicus, the new less dogmatic and more empirical approach to anatomy by Andreas Vesalius was published. Nevertheless, in the Renaissance, medicine remains a tradition-bound discipline, proud of its millennial history and its superiority over the empirical, non-academic healers. When syphilis appeared in Europe, several explanations were elaborated. In the mid-16th century, an Italian doctor Luigi Luigini (born in 1526) published in Venice a collection of all the works on syphilis that appeared until 1566. He wanted to entrust to colleagues, contemporary and future, a compendium of all that was known about the "new" disease (the Latin term Novus means both "new" and "strange"). According to the most authors of the collection, the disease is in fact "new" and "strange". Some authors of the collection find it impossible that authorities like Hippocrates and Galen overlooked it. Luigini's work shows the authors' effort to absorb syphilis in the corpus of academic medicine and affirm the authority of academic physicians against the empirical healers.

十六世纪梅毒的历史和路易吉·路易吉尼在文艺复兴时期的关键作用
梅毒是引发跨国(欧洲)医生讨论的“新疾病”的典型例子。它出现在中世纪末期和近代初期(16世纪初)之间,当时医学正从一门教条主义学科转变为一门实验学科。主要的变化发生在解剖学领域:1543年,也就是尼古拉斯·哥白尼颠覆天文学的同一年,安德烈亚斯·维萨里乌斯发表了一篇较少教条主义、更多经验主义的解剖学新方法。尽管如此,在文艺复兴时期,医学仍然是一门受传统束缚的学科,为其千年的历史和对经验主义、非学术治疗师的优势感到自豪。当梅毒在欧洲出现时,有几种解释。16世纪中期,意大利医生路易吉·路易吉尼(生于1526年)在威尼斯出版了一本集,收录了1566年以前所有关于梅毒的著作。他想把所有关于这种“新”疾病(拉丁文Novus的意思是“新的”和“奇怪的”)的知识简编交给现在和未来的同事。根据大多数作者的说法,这种疾病实际上是“新的”和“奇怪的”。一些文集的作者发现,像希波克拉底和盖伦这样的权威人士不可能忽视它。路易吉尼的工作表明,作者努力将梅毒纳入学术医学的语库,并肯定了学术医生对经验治疗师的权威。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica
Acta Medico-Historica Adriatica HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信