Temporal changes of PIRADS scoring by radiologists and correlation to radical prostatectomy pathological outcomes

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sung Kyu Hong , Sang Hun Song , Hak Ju Kim , Hae Sung Lee , Jun Hyun Nam , Seung Bae Lee
{"title":"Temporal changes of PIRADS scoring by radiologists and correlation to radical prostatectomy pathological outcomes","authors":"Sung Kyu Hong ,&nbsp;Sang Hun Song ,&nbsp;Hak Ju Kim ,&nbsp;Hae Sung Lee ,&nbsp;Jun Hyun Nam ,&nbsp;Seung Bae Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2022.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess temporal improvement of prostate image reporting and data system (PIRADS) 3-5 lesion correlation to histopathologic findings from radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of 1481 patients who underwent RP for biopsy-proven PCa between 2015 and 2019 were divided into 14 groups of 100 sequential readings for the evaluation of histopathological correlation with PIRADS readings. Temporal trends of PIRADS distribution and predictive performance for RP pathology were evaluated to assess underlying changes in prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation by radiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PIRADS 4-5 lesions were significantly correlated with the increasing rates of Gleason Group (GG) upgrade (p = 0.044) and decreasing rate of GG downgrade (p = 0.016) over time. PIRADS ≥3 lesions read after median 2 years of experience were shown to independently predict intermediate–high-risk (GG ≥ 3) PCa (odds ratio 2.93, 95% confidence interval 1.00–8.54; <em>P</em>= 0.049) in RP pathology. Preoperative GG ≥ 3 biopsy lesions with PIRADS 4-5 lesions were significantly more susceptible to GG upgrade (<em>P</em>= 0.035) and GG ≥ 4 RP pathology (p = 0.003) in experienced reads, in contrast to insignificant findings in early readings (p = 0.588 and 0.248, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Preoperative MRI reports matched with RP pathology suggest an improved prediction of adverse pathology in PIRADS 3-5 lesions over time, suggesting a temporal change in PIRADS interpretation and predictive accuracy. Institutions with low volume experience should use caution in solely relying on MRI for predicting tumor characteristics. Future prospective trials and larger scale assessments are required to further validate our results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 188-193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/38/b6/main.PMC9747593.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S228788822200040X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose

To assess temporal improvement of prostate image reporting and data system (PIRADS) 3-5 lesion correlation to histopathologic findings from radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods

A total of 1481 patients who underwent RP for biopsy-proven PCa between 2015 and 2019 were divided into 14 groups of 100 sequential readings for the evaluation of histopathological correlation with PIRADS readings. Temporal trends of PIRADS distribution and predictive performance for RP pathology were evaluated to assess underlying changes in prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation by radiologists.

Results

PIRADS 4-5 lesions were significantly correlated with the increasing rates of Gleason Group (GG) upgrade (p = 0.044) and decreasing rate of GG downgrade (p = 0.016) over time. PIRADS ≥3 lesions read after median 2 years of experience were shown to independently predict intermediate–high-risk (GG ≥ 3) PCa (odds ratio 2.93, 95% confidence interval 1.00–8.54; P= 0.049) in RP pathology. Preoperative GG ≥ 3 biopsy lesions with PIRADS 4-5 lesions were significantly more susceptible to GG upgrade (P= 0.035) and GG ≥ 4 RP pathology (p = 0.003) in experienced reads, in contrast to insignificant findings in early readings (p = 0.588 and 0.248, respectively).

Conclusion

Preoperative MRI reports matched with RP pathology suggest an improved prediction of adverse pathology in PIRADS 3-5 lesions over time, suggesting a temporal change in PIRADS interpretation and predictive accuracy. Institutions with low volume experience should use caution in solely relying on MRI for predicting tumor characteristics. Future prospective trials and larger scale assessments are required to further validate our results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

放射科医师PIRADS评分的时间变化及其与根治性前列腺切除术病理结果的相关性
目的探讨前列腺癌(PCa)根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后,前列腺图像报告和数据系统(PIRADS) 3-5病变与组织病理学结果的相关性。材料和方法2015年至2019年期间,共有1481例活检证实的PCa患者接受了RP,分为14组,每组100个顺序读数,以评估组织病理学与PIRADS读数的相关性。评估PIRADS分布的时间趋势和RP病理的预测性能,以评估放射科医生对前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)解释的潜在变化。结果随着时间的推移,spirads 4-5病变与Gleason Group (GG)升级率升高(p = 0.044)、GG降级率降低(p = 0.016)显著相关。中位2年后读取的PIRADS≥3个病变可独立预测中高危(GG≥3)PCa(优势比2.93,95%可信区间1.00-8.54;P= 0.049)。术前GG≥3个活检病变伴PIRADS 4-5个病变明显更容易发生GG升级(P= 0.035)和GG≥4个RP病理(P= 0.003),而早期读数不显著(P= 0.588和0.248)。结论术前MRI报告与RP病理相匹配表明,随着时间的推移,PIRADS 3-5个病变的不良病理预测得到了改善,这表明PIRADS的解释和预测准确性在时间上发生了变化。经验不足的机构在单纯依靠MRI预测肿瘤特征时应谨慎。未来的前瞻性试验和更大规模的评估需要进一步验证我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信