Transabdominal Ultrasound Evaluation of Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction in Children.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ya Ma, Zhengrong Wang, Mao Ye, Yang Yang, Luyu Liu
{"title":"Transabdominal Ultrasound Evaluation of Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction in Children.","authors":"Ya Ma,&nbsp;Zhengrong Wang,&nbsp;Mao Ye,&nbsp;Yang Yang,&nbsp;Luyu Liu","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The development of high-frequency ultrasound made the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) possible. However, no study has been performed to clarify the sensitivity and specificity of transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) in the diagnosis of PBM. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of TAUS in the diagnosis of pediatric PBM and to assess factors that may influence the accuracy of ultrasound. This was a prospective study and 43 patients with suspected PBM were enrolled. All of these patients underwent TAUS examination to detect the pancreaticobiliary ductal union. Final diagnoses were determined by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or intraoperative cholangiography. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Fisher exact test was used to analyze the difference of sonographic features between false-negative group and true-positive group. Transabdominal ultrasound demonstrated 77.4% (95% confidence interval, 58.5%-89.7%) sensitivity and 100% (95% confidence interval, 69.9%-100%) specificity for PMB diagnosis. In the false-negative group, infant patients (71.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.012), cystic dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) (71.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.012), and stenosis of the distal CBD (71.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.012) were more frequently observed than in the true-positive group. On the other hand, the true-positive group showed a higher incidence of protein plugs than the false-negative group (62.5% vs 0%, P = 0.007). Transabdominal ultrasound may serve as a potential alternative detection modality for pediatric patients with suspected PBM. Nondetection of the anomaly may be attributed to factors, such as younger age, cystic dilatation of the CBD, and stenosis of the distal CBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The development of high-frequency ultrasound made the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) possible. However, no study has been performed to clarify the sensitivity and specificity of transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) in the diagnosis of PBM. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of TAUS in the diagnosis of pediatric PBM and to assess factors that may influence the accuracy of ultrasound. This was a prospective study and 43 patients with suspected PBM were enrolled. All of these patients underwent TAUS examination to detect the pancreaticobiliary ductal union. Final diagnoses were determined by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or intraoperative cholangiography. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Fisher exact test was used to analyze the difference of sonographic features between false-negative group and true-positive group. Transabdominal ultrasound demonstrated 77.4% (95% confidence interval, 58.5%-89.7%) sensitivity and 100% (95% confidence interval, 69.9%-100%) specificity for PMB diagnosis. In the false-negative group, infant patients (71.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.012), cystic dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) (71.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.012), and stenosis of the distal CBD (71.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.012) were more frequently observed than in the true-positive group. On the other hand, the true-positive group showed a higher incidence of protein plugs than the false-negative group (62.5% vs 0%, P = 0.007). Transabdominal ultrasound may serve as a potential alternative detection modality for pediatric patients with suspected PBM. Nondetection of the anomaly may be attributed to factors, such as younger age, cystic dilatation of the CBD, and stenosis of the distal CBD.

经腹超声对儿童胰胆管畸形的评价。
摘要:高频超声技术的发展使诊断胰胆管畸形(PBM)成为可能。然而,尚未有研究明确经腹超声(TAUS)诊断PBM的敏感性和特异性。本研究的目的是评估TAUS在儿童PBM诊断中的准确性,并评估可能影响超声准确性的因素。这是一项前瞻性研究,纳入了43例疑似PBM患者。所有患者均行TAUS检查以检测胰胆管连接。最终诊断由内镜逆行胆管造影或术中胆管造影确定。计算敏感性和特异性。采用Fisher精确检验分析假阴性组与真阳性组超声特征的差异。经腹超声诊断PMB的灵敏度为77.4%(95%可信区间,58.5% ~ 89.7%),特异性为100%(95%可信区间,69.9% ~ 100%)。在假阴性组中,婴儿患者(71.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.012)、总胆管(CBD)囊性扩张(71.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.012)和远端胆管狭窄(71.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.012)的发生率高于真阳性组。另一方面,真阳性组的蛋白栓发生率高于假阴性组(62.5% vs 0%, P = 0.007)。经腹超声可能作为一种潜在的替代检测方式为小儿患者怀疑PBM。未检测到异常可能归因于诸如年龄较小,CBD囊性扩张和远端CBD狭窄等因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Quarterly
Ultrasound Quarterly RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography. Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信