Alveolar ridge augmentation for implant placement in a growing patient

Abstract

Background

Partial edentulism in growing children due to aplasia or trauma poses a difficult situation to manage. We present a case of horizontal ridge augmentation in a growing patient who had trauma in childhood when it was too early to place implants.

Methods and Results

This patient had a history of trauma, at age 13, that resulted in mandibular fracture and loss of teeth #23–27. The definitive restorative treatment plan was postponed due to the patient's continued growth. At age 18, horizontal bone augmentation was performed in a severely resorbed anterior mandible. After 7 months of healing, 7–8 mm ridge augmentation was achieved, and three implants were placed. Soft tissue augmentation by free gingival graft was performed at implant second stage surgery 4 months later.

Conclusions

When considering the timing of implant placement in adolescents, the clinician walks a fine line between waiting as long as possible to place the implants and racing against continued resorption of the edentulous alveolar ridge. 70/30 mineralized/demineralized cortical bone allograft and injectable platelet-rich fibrin mix combined with tenting screws and resorbable membranes are useful measures for horizontal ridge augmentation in growing patients.

Key points

Why is this case new information?

• There are insufficient data available when considering implant treatment in younger patients. The present case was managed with a variation of the sausage technique described by Urban. The use of allograft, I-PRF, and tenting screws replaced the use of autogenous bone and resulted in exceptional results.

What are the keys to the successful management of this case?

• Delaying treatment until after the critical growth period has passed. Adequate flap release, tension-free primary flap closure, and space maintenance through the use of tenting screws and tacking the membranes using tacking pins provided support for the grafted site.

What are the primary limitations to success in this case?

• The continued growth may cause infra occlusion of the implant-supported bridge.