Physiological and psychological stress responses to labor and delivery during COVID-19 pandemic: a cohort study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Aula Asali, Sivan Farladansky-Gershnabel, Noa Hasky, Michal Elbaz, Ami Fishman, Dorit Ravid, Amir Wiser, Tal Biron-Shental, Arie Berkovitz, Netanella Miller
{"title":"Physiological and psychological stress responses to labor and delivery during COVID-19 pandemic: a cohort study.","authors":"Aula Asali,&nbsp;Sivan Farladansky-Gershnabel,&nbsp;Noa Hasky,&nbsp;Michal Elbaz,&nbsp;Ami Fishman,&nbsp;Dorit Ravid,&nbsp;Amir Wiser,&nbsp;Tal Biron-Shental,&nbsp;Arie Berkovitz,&nbsp;Netanella Miller","doi":"10.1080/0167482X.2022.2030308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate objective (saliva cortisol) and subjective (questionnaire) stress levels during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic compared to before the pandemic and their effects on obstetric and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study included 36 women with low-risk, singleton, term deliveries at a tertiary academic center during the COVID-19 pandemic and 49 who delivered before. Physiological stress was evaluated with salivary cortisol measurements, and emotional stress with stress scale questionnaires (0-10) during active and full dilation stages of labor, and 2-min postpartum. Cord blood cortisol and pH were obtained. Delivery mode, complications, and neonatal outcomes were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychological stress was higher for the COVID-19 group compared to controls during full dilation (6.2<b> </b>±<b> </b>3.4 <i>vs.</i> 4.2<b> </b>±<b> </b>3, <i>p</i> = .009). The COVID-19 group had significantly lower cord cortisol levels (7.3<b> </b><i>vs.</i> 13.6<b> </b>mcg/dl, <i>p</i><b> </b>=<b> </b>.001). No differences were found regarding salivary cortisol level assessments at active, full dilation and 2-min post-delivery (<i>p</i><b> </b>=<b> </b>.584, <i>p</i><b> </b>=<b> </b>.254, <i>p</i><b> </b>=<b> </b>.829, respectively). No differences were found regarding pH<b> </b><<b> </b>7.1 (<i>p</i><b> </b>=<b> </b>.487), 1- and 5-min Apgar scores<b> </b><<b> </b>7 (<i>p</i><b> </b>=<b> </b>.179) and neonatal weight (<i>p</i><b> </b>=<b> </b>.958).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women who delivered during COVID-19 pandemic had higher stress levels at full dilation and lower cord cortisol levels, as may be expected after exposure to a chronic stressor.</p>","PeriodicalId":50072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2022.2030308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate objective (saliva cortisol) and subjective (questionnaire) stress levels during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic compared to before the pandemic and their effects on obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Methods: This cohort study included 36 women with low-risk, singleton, term deliveries at a tertiary academic center during the COVID-19 pandemic and 49 who delivered before. Physiological stress was evaluated with salivary cortisol measurements, and emotional stress with stress scale questionnaires (0-10) during active and full dilation stages of labor, and 2-min postpartum. Cord blood cortisol and pH were obtained. Delivery mode, complications, and neonatal outcomes were evaluated.

Results: Psychological stress was higher for the COVID-19 group compared to controls during full dilation (6.2 ± 3.4 vs. 4.2 ± 3, p = .009). The COVID-19 group had significantly lower cord cortisol levels (7.3 vs. 13.6 mcg/dl, p = .001). No differences were found regarding salivary cortisol level assessments at active, full dilation and 2-min post-delivery (p = .584, p = .254, p = .829, respectively). No differences were found regarding pH < 7.1 (p = .487), 1- and 5-min Apgar scores < 7 (p = .179) and neonatal weight (p = .958).

Conclusions: Women who delivered during COVID-19 pandemic had higher stress levels at full dilation and lower cord cortisol levels, as may be expected after exposure to a chronic stressor.

COVID-19大流行期间对分娩和分娩的生理和心理应激反应:一项队列研究
目的:评价冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间客观(唾液皮质醇)和主观(问卷)压力水平与大流行前的比较及其对产科和新生儿结局的影响。方法:本队列研究包括36名在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在某高等教育中心分娩的低风险、单胎、足月分娩的妇女和49名在此之前分娩的妇女。在产程主动扩张期和充分扩张期以及产后2分钟,通过唾液皮质醇测量来评估生理应激,通过应激量表(0-10)来评估情绪应激。测定脐带血皮质醇和pH值。评估分娩方式、并发症和新生儿结局。结果:与对照组相比,COVID-19组在完全扩张期间的心理压力更高(6.2±3.4比4.2±3,p = 0.009)。COVID-19组脐带皮质醇水平显著降低(7.3微克/分升vs 13.6微克/分升,p = 0.001)。在活跃期、完全扩张期和分娩后2分钟,唾液皮质醇水平评估无差异(p = 0.584, p = 0.254, p = 0.829)。在pH 7.1 (p = .487)、1和5分钟Apgar评分7 (p = .179)和新生儿体重(p = .958)方面没有发现差异。结论:在COVID-19大流行期间分娩的妇女在完全扩张时的压力水平较高,脐带皮质醇水平较低,这与暴露于慢性压力源后的预期一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology was founded in 1982 in order to provide a scientific forum for obstetricians, gynecologists, psychiatrists and psychologists, academic health professionals as well as for all those who are interested in the psychosocial and psychosomatic aspects of women’s health. Another of its aims is to stimulate obstetricians and gynecologists to pay more attention to this very important facet of their profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信