Why Resilience in Health Care Systems is More than Coping with Disasters: Implications for Health Care Policy.

Doris A Behrens, Marion S Rauner, Margit Sommersguter-Reichmann
{"title":"Why Resilience in Health Care Systems is More than Coping with Disasters: Implications for Health Care Policy.","authors":"Doris A Behrens,&nbsp;Marion S Rauner,&nbsp;Margit Sommersguter-Reichmann","doi":"10.1007/s41471-022-00132-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health care systems need to be resilient to deal with disasters like the global spread of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) on top of serving the changing needs of a multi-morbid, ageing and often dispersed population. This paper identifies, discusses and augments critical dimensions of resilience retrieved from the academic literature. It pulls together an integrated concept of resilience characterised by organisational capabilities. Our concept does not focus on the micro-level like most resilience literature in health care but addresses the system level with many stakeholders involved. Distinguishing exogenous shocks to the health care system into adverse events and planned innovations provides the basis for our conclusions and insights. It becomes apparent only when dealing with planned interventions that transformative capabilities are indispensable to cope with sudden increases in health care pressures. Due to the current focus on absorptive and adaptive resilience, organisations over-rely on management capabilities that cannot generate a lasting increase in functionality. Therefore, reducing the resilience discussion to bouncing back from adverse events could deceive organisations into cultivating a suboptimal mix of organisational capabilities lacking transformative capabilities, which pave the way for a structural change that aims at a sustainably higher functionality.</p>","PeriodicalId":74759,"journal":{"name":"Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift fur betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung = Schmalenbach journal of business research","volume":"74 4","pages":"465-495"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990280/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift fur betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung = Schmalenbach journal of business research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-022-00132-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Health care systems need to be resilient to deal with disasters like the global spread of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) on top of serving the changing needs of a multi-morbid, ageing and often dispersed population. This paper identifies, discusses and augments critical dimensions of resilience retrieved from the academic literature. It pulls together an integrated concept of resilience characterised by organisational capabilities. Our concept does not focus on the micro-level like most resilience literature in health care but addresses the system level with many stakeholders involved. Distinguishing exogenous shocks to the health care system into adverse events and planned innovations provides the basis for our conclusions and insights. It becomes apparent only when dealing with planned interventions that transformative capabilities are indispensable to cope with sudden increases in health care pressures. Due to the current focus on absorptive and adaptive resilience, organisations over-rely on management capabilities that cannot generate a lasting increase in functionality. Therefore, reducing the resilience discussion to bouncing back from adverse events could deceive organisations into cultivating a suboptimal mix of organisational capabilities lacking transformative capabilities, which pave the way for a structural change that aims at a sustainably higher functionality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

为什么医疗保健系统的恢复力不仅仅是应对灾害:对医疗保健政策的影响。
卫生保健系统需要具有复原力,以应对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)在全球传播等灾害,同时还要满足多种疾病、老龄化和往往分散的人口不断变化的需求。本文从学术文献中识别、讨论并增加了弹性的关键维度。它汇集了一个以组织能力为特征的弹性的综合概念。我们的概念不像大多数医疗保健领域的弹性文献那样专注于微观层面,而是涉及许多利益相关者的系统层面。将医疗保健系统的外源性冲击区分为不良事件和计划创新,为我们的结论和见解提供了基础。只有在处理有计划的干预措施时,才能明显看出,变革能力对于应对突然增加的卫生保健压力是必不可少的。由于目前关注的是吸收性和适应性弹性,组织过度依赖于无法产生持久功能增长的管理能力。因此,将弹性讨论减少到从不利事件中反弹可能会欺骗组织培养缺乏变革能力的组织能力的次优组合,这为旨在实现可持续更高功能的结构变革铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信