Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091): an interim analysis of a randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial.

IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Mary O'Brien, Luis Paz-Ares, Sandrine Marreaud, Urania Dafni, Kersti Oselin, Libor Havel, Emilio Esteban, Dolores Isla, Alex Martinez-Marti, Martin Faehling, Masahiro Tsuboi, Jong-Seok Lee, Kazuhiko Nakagawa, Jing Yang, Ayman Samkari, Steven M Keller, Murielle Mauer, Nitish Jha, Rolf Stahel, Benjamin Besse, Solange Peters
{"title":"Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091): an interim analysis of a randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial.","authors":"Mary O'Brien,&nbsp;Luis Paz-Ares,&nbsp;Sandrine Marreaud,&nbsp;Urania Dafni,&nbsp;Kersti Oselin,&nbsp;Libor Havel,&nbsp;Emilio Esteban,&nbsp;Dolores Isla,&nbsp;Alex Martinez-Marti,&nbsp;Martin Faehling,&nbsp;Masahiro Tsuboi,&nbsp;Jong-Seok Lee,&nbsp;Kazuhiko Nakagawa,&nbsp;Jing Yang,&nbsp;Ayman Samkari,&nbsp;Steven M Keller,&nbsp;Murielle Mauer,&nbsp;Nitish Jha,&nbsp;Rolf Stahel,&nbsp;Benjamin Besse,&nbsp;Solange Peters","doi":"10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00518-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pembrolizumab is a standard-of-care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091), patients were recruited from 196 medical centres in 29 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with completely resected, pathologically confirmed stage IB (tumours of ≥4 cm in diameter), II, or IIIA NSCLC per the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition) of any histology or PD-L1 expression level, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; adjuvant chemotherapy was to be considered for stage IB disease and was strongly recommended for stage II and IIIA disease, according to national and local guidelines. Using a central interactive voice-response system, eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimisation technique and stratified by disease stage, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, PD-L1 expression, and geographical region, to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 18 cycles. Participants, investigators, and analysts were masked to treatment assignment. Dual primary endpoints were disease-free survival in the overall population and in the population with PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) of 50% or greater. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group). Safety was assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here we report results of the second interim analysis, prespecified to occur when approximately 118 disease-free survival events had occurred in the PD-L1 TPS of 50% or greater population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02504372, and is active but not recruiting.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Jan 20, 2016, and May 6, 2020, 1177 (60%) of 1955 screened participants were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=590, including n=168 with PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%) or placebo (n=587; including n=165 with PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%) and included in the ITT population. Median follow-up as of data cutoff (Sept 20, 2021) for this interim analysis was 35·6 months (IQR 27·1-45·5). In the overall population, median disease-free survival was 53·6 months (95% CI 39·2 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab group versus 42·0 months (31·3 to not reached) in the placebo group (HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·63-0·91], p=0·0014). In the PD-L1 TPS of 50% or greater population, median disease-free survival was not reached in either the pembrolizumab group (95% CI 44·3 to not reached) or the placebo group (95% CI 35·8 to not reached; HR 0·82 [95% CI 0·57-1·18]; p=0·14). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 198 (34%) of 580 participants who received pembrolizumab and 150 (26%) of 581 participants who received placebo. Grade 3 or worse events that occurred in at least ten participants in either treatment group were hypertension (35 [6%]) and pneumonia (12 [2%]) with pembrolizumab and hypertension (32 [6%]) with placebo. Serious adverse events occurred in 142 (24%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 90 (15%) in the placebo group; serious adverse events that occurred in more than 1% of participants were pneumonia (13 [2%]), pneumonitis (12 [2%]), and diarrhoea (seven [1%]) with pembrolizumab and pneumonia (nine [2%]) with placebo. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants treated with pembrolizumab (one due to both cardiogenic shock and myocarditis, one due to both septic shock and myocarditis, one due to pneumonia, and one due to sudden death) and in no participants treated with placebo.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Pembrolizumab significantly improved disease-free survival compared with placebo and was not associated with new safety signals in completely resected, PD-L1-unselected, stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Pembrolizumab is potentially a new treatment option for stage IB-IIIA NSCLC after complete resection and, when recommended, adjuvant chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck &amp; Co.</p>","PeriodicalId":17942,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Oncology","volume":"23 10","pages":"1274-1286"},"PeriodicalIF":33.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"104","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00518-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

Abstract

Background: Pembrolizumab is a standard-of-care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC.

Methods: In this randomised, triple-blind, phase 3 trial (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091), patients were recruited from 196 medical centres in 29 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with completely resected, pathologically confirmed stage IB (tumours of ≥4 cm in diameter), II, or IIIA NSCLC per the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition) of any histology or PD-L1 expression level, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; adjuvant chemotherapy was to be considered for stage IB disease and was strongly recommended for stage II and IIIA disease, according to national and local guidelines. Using a central interactive voice-response system, eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1), using a minimisation technique and stratified by disease stage, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, PD-L1 expression, and geographical region, to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, both administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 18 cycles. Participants, investigators, and analysts were masked to treatment assignment. Dual primary endpoints were disease-free survival in the overall population and in the population with PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) of 50% or greater. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group). Safety was assessed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here we report results of the second interim analysis, prespecified to occur when approximately 118 disease-free survival events had occurred in the PD-L1 TPS of 50% or greater population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02504372, and is active but not recruiting.

Findings: Between Jan 20, 2016, and May 6, 2020, 1177 (60%) of 1955 screened participants were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=590, including n=168 with PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%) or placebo (n=587; including n=165 with PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%) and included in the ITT population. Median follow-up as of data cutoff (Sept 20, 2021) for this interim analysis was 35·6 months (IQR 27·1-45·5). In the overall population, median disease-free survival was 53·6 months (95% CI 39·2 to not reached) in the pembrolizumab group versus 42·0 months (31·3 to not reached) in the placebo group (HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·63-0·91], p=0·0014). In the PD-L1 TPS of 50% or greater population, median disease-free survival was not reached in either the pembrolizumab group (95% CI 44·3 to not reached) or the placebo group (95% CI 35·8 to not reached; HR 0·82 [95% CI 0·57-1·18]; p=0·14). Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 198 (34%) of 580 participants who received pembrolizumab and 150 (26%) of 581 participants who received placebo. Grade 3 or worse events that occurred in at least ten participants in either treatment group were hypertension (35 [6%]) and pneumonia (12 [2%]) with pembrolizumab and hypertension (32 [6%]) with placebo. Serious adverse events occurred in 142 (24%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 90 (15%) in the placebo group; serious adverse events that occurred in more than 1% of participants were pneumonia (13 [2%]), pneumonitis (12 [2%]), and diarrhoea (seven [1%]) with pembrolizumab and pneumonia (nine [2%]) with placebo. Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants treated with pembrolizumab (one due to both cardiogenic shock and myocarditis, one due to both septic shock and myocarditis, one due to pneumonia, and one due to sudden death) and in no participants treated with placebo.

Interpretation: Pembrolizumab significantly improved disease-free survival compared with placebo and was not associated with new safety signals in completely resected, PD-L1-unselected, stage IB-IIIA NSCLC. Pembrolizumab is potentially a new treatment option for stage IB-IIIA NSCLC after complete resection and, when recommended, adjuvant chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 expression.

Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Pembrolizumab与安慰剂作为完全切除的IB-IIIA期非小细胞肺癌的辅助治疗(PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091):一项随机、三盲、3期试验的中期分析。
背景:派姆单抗是晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗药物。我们评估了派姆单抗作为完全切除的IB-IIIA期NSCLC的辅助治疗。方法:在这项随机、三盲、3期试验(PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091)中,患者从29个国家的196个医疗中心招募。符合条件的患者年龄为18岁或以上,完全切除,病理证实的IB期(肿瘤直径≥4cm), II期或IIIA期NSCLC(根据美国癌症分期系统联合委员会(第7版)的任何组织学或PD-L1表达水平,东部肿瘤合作组性能状态为0或1;根据国家和地方指南,IB期疾病应考虑辅助化疗,强烈推荐II期和IIIA期疾病进行辅助化疗。使用中央交互式语音应答系统,符合条件的参与者被随机分配(1:1),使用最小化技术并根据疾病分期,既往辅助化疗,PD-L1表达和地理区域分层,使用派姆单抗200mg或安慰剂,每3周静脉注射一次,最多18个周期。参与者、调查人员和分析人员被掩盖到治疗分配。双主要终点是总体人群和PD-L1肿瘤比例评分(TPS)为50%或更高的人群的无病生存。在意向治疗(ITT)人群(即所有参与者随机分配到治疗组)中评估疗效。对随机分配到至少接受一剂研究治疗的所有参与者的安全性进行评估。在这里,我们报告了第二次中期分析的结果,预先指定在50%或以上的PD-L1 TPS人群中发生大约118个无病生存事件。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT02504372,处于活跃状态,但未招募。结果:在2016年1月20日至2020年5月6日期间,1955名筛选的参与者中有1177名(60%)被随机分配到派姆单抗组(n=590,其中n=168, PD-L1 TPS≥50%)或安慰剂组(n=587;包括n=165名PD-L1 TPS≥50%的患者),并被纳入ITT人群。截至数据截止日期(2021年9月20日),该中期分析的中位随访时间为35.6个月(IQR 27.1 - 45.5)。在总体人群中,派姆单抗组的中位无病生存期为53.6个月(95% CI 39.2至未达到),而安慰剂组的中位无病生存期为40.2个月(31.3至未达到)(HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.63 - 0.91], p= 0.0014)。在PD-L1 TPS为50%或更高的人群中,派姆单抗组(95% CI为44.3至未达到)或安慰剂组(95% CI为35.8至未达到;Hr 0.82 [95% ci 0.57 ~ 1.18];p = 0·14)。580名接受派姆单抗治疗的参与者中有198人(34%)发生了3级或更严重的不良事件,581名接受安慰剂治疗的参与者中有150人(26%)发生了3级或更严重的不良事件。在两个治疗组中,至少有10名参与者发生3级或更严重的事件:派姆单抗组高血压(35例[6%])和肺炎(12例[2%]),安慰剂组高血压(32例[6%])。派姆单抗组142例(24%)和安慰剂组90例(15%)发生严重不良事件;在超过1%的参与者中发生的严重不良事件是派姆单抗组肺炎(13例[2%])、肺炎(12例[2%])和腹泻(7例[1%]),安慰剂组肺炎(9例[2%])。治疗相关不良事件导致4例(1%)接受派姆单抗治疗的受试者死亡(1例因心源性休克和心肌炎死亡,1例因感染性休克和心肌炎死亡,1例因肺炎死亡,1例因猝死),没有接受安慰剂治疗的受试者死亡。解释:与安慰剂相比,Pembrolizumab显著提高了完全切除、pd - l1未选择的IB-IIIA期NSCLC的无病生存率,并且与新的安全性信号无关。Pembrolizumab可能是IB-IIIA期NSCLC完全切除后的新治疗选择,并且在推荐时,无论PD-L1表达如何,都可以辅助化疗。资助:Merck Sharp &Dohme是默克公司的子公司。有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Oncology
Lancet Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
62.10
自引率
1.00%
发文量
913
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Oncology is a trusted international journal that addresses various topics in clinical practice, health policy, and global oncology. It covers a wide range of cancer types, including breast, endocrine system, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, gynaecological, haematological, head and neck, neurooncology, paediatric, thoracic, sarcoma, and skin cancers. Additionally, it includes articles on epidemiology, cancer prevention and control, supportive care, imaging, and health-care systems. The journal has an Impact Factor of 51.1, making it the leading clinical oncology research journal worldwide. It publishes different types of articles, such as Articles, Reviews, Policy Reviews, Personal Views, Clinical Pictures, Comments, Correspondence, News, and Perspectives. The Lancet Oncology also collaborates with societies, governments, NGOs, and academic centers to publish Series and Commissions that aim to drive positive changes in clinical practice and health policy in areas of global oncology that require attention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书