Real-world EUROCRINE® registry data challenge the reliability of Bethesda cytopathology for thyroid surgery indication.

IF 1.2 Q2 SURGERY
Julia I Staubitz, Alicia Poplawski, Felix Watzka, Thomas J Musholt
{"title":"Real-world EUROCRINE<sup>®</sup> registry data challenge the reliability of Bethesda cytopathology for thyroid surgery indication.","authors":"Julia I Staubitz,&nbsp;Alicia Poplawski,&nbsp;Felix Watzka,&nbsp;Thomas J Musholt","doi":"10.1515/iss-2021-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is recommended by international guidelines for the preoperative evaluation of suspicious thyroid nodules >1 cm. Despite robust evidence from endocrine centers demonstrating the key role of FNAC results for the indication of surgery, the method is not routinely used in European clinics. The database EUROCRINE<sup>®</sup>, which was introduced in 2015 with the scope of registering operations of the endocrine system, allows for a large-scale analysis of the current service reality in Europe concerning FNAC use and associated accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Operations performed to \"exclude malignancy\", registered from January 2015 to December 2018 in EUROCRINE<sup>®</sup>, were analyzed. Parameters of accuracy were calculated for FNAC. FNAC results were considered \"test positive\" in the case of Bethesda category IV, V, and VI, since these categories usually prompt surgical interventions in European centers for thyroid surgery. Bethesda category II and III were considered \"test negative\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 8,791 operations, 5,780 had preoperative FNAC (65.7%). The overall malignancy rate was 28.3% (2,488/8,791). Malignancy rates were 68.8% for Bethesda VI, 69.9% for Bethesda V, 32.6% for Bethesda IV, 28.2% for III, 20.2% for Bethesda II, and 24.5% for Bethesda I. After exclusion of papillary microcarcinomas (PTMCs), the sensitivity of FNAC was 71.7% and specificity 43.5%, the positive predictive value was 29.1% and the negative predictive value 82.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the indication to \"exclude malignancy\" was the predominant reason that prompted thyroid resection in the present cohort, FNAC was only used in about 65.7% of cases. When performed, FNAC was associated with unexpectedly low accuracy. Interestingly, in Bethesda II, 20.2% of malignant entities were present (13.3% after the exclusion of PTMCs).</p>","PeriodicalId":44186,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","volume":"7 3-4","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742262/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2021-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is recommended by international guidelines for the preoperative evaluation of suspicious thyroid nodules >1 cm. Despite robust evidence from endocrine centers demonstrating the key role of FNAC results for the indication of surgery, the method is not routinely used in European clinics. The database EUROCRINE®, which was introduced in 2015 with the scope of registering operations of the endocrine system, allows for a large-scale analysis of the current service reality in Europe concerning FNAC use and associated accuracy.

Methods: Operations performed to "exclude malignancy", registered from January 2015 to December 2018 in EUROCRINE®, were analyzed. Parameters of accuracy were calculated for FNAC. FNAC results were considered "test positive" in the case of Bethesda category IV, V, and VI, since these categories usually prompt surgical interventions in European centers for thyroid surgery. Bethesda category II and III were considered "test negative".

Results: Of 8,791 operations, 5,780 had preoperative FNAC (65.7%). The overall malignancy rate was 28.3% (2,488/8,791). Malignancy rates were 68.8% for Bethesda VI, 69.9% for Bethesda V, 32.6% for Bethesda IV, 28.2% for III, 20.2% for Bethesda II, and 24.5% for Bethesda I. After exclusion of papillary microcarcinomas (PTMCs), the sensitivity of FNAC was 71.7% and specificity 43.5%, the positive predictive value was 29.1% and the negative predictive value 82.7%.

Conclusions: Although the indication to "exclude malignancy" was the predominant reason that prompted thyroid resection in the present cohort, FNAC was only used in about 65.7% of cases. When performed, FNAC was associated with unexpectedly low accuracy. Interestingly, in Bethesda II, 20.2% of malignant entities were present (13.3% after the exclusion of PTMCs).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

真实世界EUROCRINE®注册数据对Bethesda细胞病理学诊断甲状腺手术指征的可靠性提出了挑战。
目的:细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)被国际指南推荐用于术前评估> 1cm的可疑甲状腺结节。尽管来自内分泌中心的有力证据表明FNAC结果对手术指征的关键作用,但该方法并未在欧洲诊所常规使用。EUROCRINE®数据库于2015年推出,其注册范围包括内分泌系统的操作,可以对欧洲当前有关FNAC使用和相关准确性的服务现状进行大规模分析。方法:对2015年1月至2018年12月在EUROCRINE®登记的“排除恶性肿瘤”手术进行分析。计算了FNAC的精度参数。在Bethesda的病例中,FNAC结果被认为是“检测阳性”,因为这些类别通常在欧洲甲状腺手术中心提示手术干预。Bethesda II类和III类被认为是“测试阴性”。结果:8791例手术中,术前FNAC 5780例(65.7%)。总恶性率为28.3%(2488 / 8791)。在排除乳头状微癌(PTMCs)后,FNAC的敏感性为71.7%,特异性为43.5%,阳性预测值为29.1%,阴性预测值为82.7%,阳性预测值为29.1%。结论:虽然“排除恶性肿瘤”指征是本队列中促使甲状腺切除术的主要原因,但FNAC仅在约65.7%的病例中使用。当执行时,FNAC与出乎意料的低准确率相关。有趣的是,在Bethesda II中,20.2%的恶性实体存在(排除ptmc后为13.3%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信