Hypoxia signatures in closed-circuit rebreather divers.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Daniel Popa, Craig Kutz, Morgan Carlile, Kaighley Brett, Esteban A Moya, Frank Powell, Peter Witucki, Richard Sadler, Charlotte Sadler
{"title":"Hypoxia signatures in closed-circuit rebreather divers.","authors":"Daniel Popa,&nbsp;Craig Kutz,&nbsp;Morgan Carlile,&nbsp;Kaighley Brett,&nbsp;Esteban A Moya,&nbsp;Frank Powell,&nbsp;Peter Witucki,&nbsp;Richard Sadler,&nbsp;Charlotte Sadler","doi":"10.28920/dhm52.4.237-244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Faults or errors during use of closed-circuit rebreathers (CCRs) can cause hypoxia. Military aviators face a similar risk of hypoxia and undergo awareness training to determine their 'hypoxia signature', a personalised, reproducible set of symptoms. We aimed to establish a hypoxia signature among divers, and to investigate their ability to detect hypoxia and self-rescue while cognitively overloaded.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight CCR divers and 12 scuba divers underwent an initial unblinded hypoxia exposure followed by three trials; a second hypoxic trial and two normoxic trials in randomised order. Hypoxia was induced by breathing on a CCR with no oxygen supply. Subjects pedalled on a cycle ergometer while playing a neurocognitive computer game to simulate real world task loading. Subjects identified hypoxia symptoms by pointing to a board listing common hypoxia symptoms, and were instructed to perform a 'bailout' procedure to mimic self-rescue if they perceived hypoxia. Divers were prompted to bailout if peripheral oxygen saturation fell to 75%, or after six minutes during normoxic trials. Subsequently we interviewed subjects to determine their ability to distinguish hypoxia from normoxia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five percent of subjects (19/20) showed agreement between unblinded and blinded hypoxia symptoms. Subjects correctly identified the gas mixture in 85% of the trials. During unblinded hypoxia, only 25% (5/20) of subjects performed unprompted bailout. Fifty-five percent of subjects (11/20) correctly performed the bailout but only when prompted, while 15% (3/20) were unable to bailout despite prompting. During blinded hypoxia 45% of subjects (9/20) performed the bailout unprompted while 15% (3/20) remained unable to bailout despite prompting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our data support a normobaric hypoxia signature among both CCR and scuba divers under experimental conditions, most subjects were unable to recognise hypoxia in real time and perform a self-rescue unprompted, although this improved in the second hypoxia trial. These results do not support hypoxia exposure training for CCR divers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11296,"journal":{"name":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","volume":"52 4","pages":"237-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767826/pdf/DHM-52-237.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm52.4.237-244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Faults or errors during use of closed-circuit rebreathers (CCRs) can cause hypoxia. Military aviators face a similar risk of hypoxia and undergo awareness training to determine their 'hypoxia signature', a personalised, reproducible set of symptoms. We aimed to establish a hypoxia signature among divers, and to investigate their ability to detect hypoxia and self-rescue while cognitively overloaded.

Methods: Eight CCR divers and 12 scuba divers underwent an initial unblinded hypoxia exposure followed by three trials; a second hypoxic trial and two normoxic trials in randomised order. Hypoxia was induced by breathing on a CCR with no oxygen supply. Subjects pedalled on a cycle ergometer while playing a neurocognitive computer game to simulate real world task loading. Subjects identified hypoxia symptoms by pointing to a board listing common hypoxia symptoms, and were instructed to perform a 'bailout' procedure to mimic self-rescue if they perceived hypoxia. Divers were prompted to bailout if peripheral oxygen saturation fell to 75%, or after six minutes during normoxic trials. Subsequently we interviewed subjects to determine their ability to distinguish hypoxia from normoxia.

Results: Ninety-five percent of subjects (19/20) showed agreement between unblinded and blinded hypoxia symptoms. Subjects correctly identified the gas mixture in 85% of the trials. During unblinded hypoxia, only 25% (5/20) of subjects performed unprompted bailout. Fifty-five percent of subjects (11/20) correctly performed the bailout but only when prompted, while 15% (3/20) were unable to bailout despite prompting. During blinded hypoxia 45% of subjects (9/20) performed the bailout unprompted while 15% (3/20) remained unable to bailout despite prompting.

Conclusions: Although our data support a normobaric hypoxia signature among both CCR and scuba divers under experimental conditions, most subjects were unable to recognise hypoxia in real time and perform a self-rescue unprompted, although this improved in the second hypoxia trial. These results do not support hypoxia exposure training for CCR divers.

闭路换气潜水员的缺氧特征。
在使用闭路呼吸器(CCRs)过程中的故障或错误会导致缺氧。军事飞行员面临着类似的缺氧风险,并接受意识训练,以确定他们的“缺氧特征”,这是一组个性化的、可重复的症状。我们的目的是在潜水员中建立一个缺氧信号,并研究他们在认知超载时检测缺氧和自救的能力。方法:8名CCR潜水员和12名水肺潜水员进行了最初的无盲缺氧暴露,随后进行了3项试验;按随机顺序进行第二次低氧试验和两次常氧试验。缺氧是通过无氧CCR呼吸引起的。实验对象一边踩着自行车计力器,一边玩一个神经认知电脑游戏来模拟现实世界的任务加载。受试者通过指向列出常见缺氧症状的黑板来识别缺氧症状,并被指示在感知到缺氧时执行“救助”程序来模拟自救。如果外周氧饱和度降至75%,或在正常环境试验中6分钟后,潜水员就会被提示进行救助。随后,我们采访了受试者,以确定他们区分缺氧和正常缺氧的能力。结果:95%的受试者(19/20)在非盲法和盲法缺氧症状之间表现出一致。在85%的实验中,实验对象正确地识别出了气体混合物。在非盲性缺氧时,只有25%(5/20)的受试者进行了非提示救助。55%的被试(11/20)只有在提示下才正确地执行了救市,而15%(3/20)的被试在提示下仍不能救市。在盲法缺氧期间,45%(9/20)的受试者在没有提示的情况下进行了跳伞,而15%(3/20)的受试者在提示下仍无法跳伞。结论:尽管我们的数据支持实验条件下CCR和水肺潜水员的常压缺氧特征,但大多数受试者无法实时识别缺氧并自动进行自救,尽管在第二次缺氧试验中这种情况有所改善。这些结果不支持CCR潜水员进行低氧暴露训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
Diving and hyperbaric medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine (DHM) is the combined journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) and the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS). It seeks to publish papers of high quality on all aspects of diving and hyperbaric medicine of interest to diving medical professionals, physicians of all specialties, scientists, members of the diving and hyperbaric industries, and divers. Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, unless clearly authenticated copyright exemption accompaniesthe manuscript. All manuscripts will be subject to peer review. Accepted contributions will also be subject to editing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信