Discrimination between leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 antibody encephalitis and gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor antibody encephalitis based on ResNet18.

4区 计算机科学 Q1 Arts and Humanities
Jian Pan, Ruijuan Lv, Qun Wang, Xiaobin Zhao, Jiangang Liu, Lin Ai
{"title":"Discrimination between leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 antibody encephalitis and gamma-aminobutyric acid B receptor antibody encephalitis based on ResNet18.","authors":"Jian Pan, Ruijuan Lv, Qun Wang, Xiaobin Zhao, Jiangang Liu, Lin Ai","doi":"10.1186/s42492-023-00144-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to discriminate between leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) antibody encephalitis and gamma-aminobutyric acid B (GABAB) receptor antibody encephalitis using a convolutional neural network (CNN) model. A total of 81 patients were recruited for this study. ResNet18, VGG16, and ResNet50 were trained and tested separately using 3828 positron emission tomography image slices that contained the medial temporal lobe (MTL) or basal ganglia (BG). Leave-one-out cross-validation at the patient level was used to evaluate the CNN models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were generated to evaluate the CNN models. Based on the prediction results at slice level, a decision strategy was employed to evaluate the CNN models' performance at patient level. The ResNet18 model achieved the best performance at the slice (AUC = 0.86, accuracy = 80.28%) and patient levels (AUC = 0.98, accuracy = 96.30%). Specifically, at the slice level, 73.28% (1445/1972) of image slices with GABAB receptor antibody encephalitis and 87.72% (1628/1856) of image slices with LGI1 antibody encephalitis were accurately detected. At the patient level, 94.12% (16/17) of patients with GABAB receptor antibody encephalitis and 96.88% (62/64) of patients with LGI1 antibody encephalitis were accurately detected. Heatmaps of the image slices extracted using gradient-weighted class activation mapping indicated that the model focused on the MTL and BG for classification. In general, the ResNet18 model is a potential approach for discriminating between LGI1 and GABAB receptor antibody encephalitis. Metabolism in the MTL and BG is important for discriminating between these two encephalitis subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":52384,"journal":{"name":"Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art","volume":"6 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-023-00144-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to discriminate between leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) antibody encephalitis and gamma-aminobutyric acid B (GABAB) receptor antibody encephalitis using a convolutional neural network (CNN) model. A total of 81 patients were recruited for this study. ResNet18, VGG16, and ResNet50 were trained and tested separately using 3828 positron emission tomography image slices that contained the medial temporal lobe (MTL) or basal ganglia (BG). Leave-one-out cross-validation at the patient level was used to evaluate the CNN models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were generated to evaluate the CNN models. Based on the prediction results at slice level, a decision strategy was employed to evaluate the CNN models' performance at patient level. The ResNet18 model achieved the best performance at the slice (AUC = 0.86, accuracy = 80.28%) and patient levels (AUC = 0.98, accuracy = 96.30%). Specifically, at the slice level, 73.28% (1445/1972) of image slices with GABAB receptor antibody encephalitis and 87.72% (1628/1856) of image slices with LGI1 antibody encephalitis were accurately detected. At the patient level, 94.12% (16/17) of patients with GABAB receptor antibody encephalitis and 96.88% (62/64) of patients with LGI1 antibody encephalitis were accurately detected. Heatmaps of the image slices extracted using gradient-weighted class activation mapping indicated that the model focused on the MTL and BG for classification. In general, the ResNet18 model is a potential approach for discriminating between LGI1 and GABAB receptor antibody encephalitis. Metabolism in the MTL and BG is important for discriminating between these two encephalitis subtypes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于ResNet18的富亮氨酸胶质瘤失活1抗体脑炎与γ -氨基丁酸B受体抗体脑炎的鉴别
本研究旨在利用卷积神经网络(CNN)模型区分富含亮氨酸的胶质瘤失活1 (LGI1)抗体脑炎和γ -氨基丁酸B (GABAB)受体抗体脑炎。这项研究共招募了81名患者。分别使用含有内侧颞叶(MTL)或基底神经节(BG)的3828张正电子发射断层扫描图像切片对ResNet18、VGG16和ResNet50进行训练和测试。在患者水平上使用留一交叉验证来评估CNN模型。生成接收者工作特征(ROC)曲线和ROC曲线下面积(AUC)来评价CNN模型。基于切片水平的预测结果,采用决策策略评估CNN模型在患者水平的性能。ResNet18模型在切片(AUC = 0.86,准确率= 80.28%)和患者水平(AUC = 0.98,准确率= 96.30%)上表现最佳。其中,在切片水平上,73.28%(1445/1972)的GABAB受体抗体脑炎图像切片和87.72%(1628/1856)的LGI1抗体脑炎图像切片被准确检测出来。在患者水平上,GABAB受体抗体脑炎患者的准确率为94.12% (16/17),LGI1抗体脑炎患者的准确率为96.88%(62/64)。使用梯度加权类激活映射提取的图像切片热图表明,该模型将重点放在MTL和BG上进行分类。总的来说,ResNet18模型是区分LGI1和GABAB受体抗体脑炎的潜在方法。MTL和BG的代谢是区分这两种脑炎亚型的重要指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art
Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信